Get help from the best in academic writing.

Wildland Fire Mitigation – How to conduct it, and implement a risk reduction plan for wildland fire mitigation, identify

Wildland Fire Mitigation – How to conduct it, and implement a risk reduction plan for wildland fire mitigation, identify graphs about Colorado’s wildland fire problems. Use the five Es. Develop a community risk reduction plan using the five Es – Education, Engineering, Enforcement, Emergency Response, and Economic Incentives.
Draft an executive summary of your CRR plan. In your summary, identify the material and tactics that you learned during this course.
If you implemented this plan for your community, how would you expect firefighters and other community members to react to it?
What did you learn about CRR during the CRR process?
How has CRR changed your views on the fire service and our role as community members?

Resolving Facebook’s Privacy Issues to Retain Users9 INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE COMMUNICATION Name Class

Resolving Facebook’s Privacy Issues to Retain Users9

INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE COMMUNICATION

Name

Class

Tutor

School, City

Date

Table of Contents

Introduction 2

Innovation Challenge: Facebook’s Privacy Issues 3

Creative Solution: Privacy Policy and Computing Algorithm Management 4

Innovation Action Plan 6

Innovation Leadership 8

The Innovation Implementation 8

Conclusion 10

Recommendation 10

References 12

Introduction

There have been changes in the contemporary business environment. Most of the changes that are affecting the business environment either work for or against the expectations of the organization. Despite the changes, one of the key attributes that is constant for all industries is that of consumers appeal being an integral component for ensuring the success of the organization. Despite the changes being highly evident in different sectors, technology companies have been going through some drastic changes that have been brought about by the fast rate at which companies have been engaging in different innovation practices. In line with this, technology companies face a number of risks that need to be significantly dealt with, especially when these companies are operating globally, with one such companies being Facebook. Facebook is one of the social media networks that is undergoing tough times as a result of the business choices it has made intending to expand its revenues. Facebook’s scandals relating to privacy issues pose a significant challenge that encompasses driving away most of its users due to cybersecurity concerns. As such, this paper seeks to give an assessment of this problem as it affects its operations differently and the strategies that the company could adopt to overcome this challenge.

Innovation Challenge: Facebook’s Social Responsibility Issues

Social media has become an integral element among most young people as a way to network and communicate with other people. Facebook is the leading social networking website by the number of subscribers as of March 2019 (Statista, 2019). This attribute places significant responsibilities on the company to protect its reputation and maintain an edge in a competitive market as it faces a number of social responsibility issues. The reason for this is linked to the fact that the company has constantly fallen into a series of issues relating to cybersecurity and ultimately the organizations social responsibility with data privacy issue being one of the key social responsibility issue that have been affecting the company’s operations (Gabriel, 2018).

For example, in 2018, Facebook was accused of selling its subscriber’s user information to Cambridge Analytica for purposes of facilitating campaign propaganda in different countries (Isaak and Hanna, 2018). Additionally, the company has also been accused of using algorithm technologies that share user information with advertisers using the platform for purposes of improving their accuracy in reaching their targeted customers (Vallina-Rodriguez et al., 2016). Facebook has been sluggish in handling both cases despite the Senate hearing in the United States (US) aiming to increase the company’s accountability. As a result, most users have resorted to leaving the social network for fear of exposure to cybercriminals and other privacy issues. Most of them have lost trust in Facebook as it has shown to disregard the users’ safety and prioritize its profits bottom line. The company also faces the challenge of legal litigation in the event of governmental intervention, which could translate into significant expenditures. This problem escalates through the fact that Facebook operates in multiple countries, which increases the potential for various lawsuits. These social irresponsible behaviors of the company therefore need to be solved using some of the best and most appropriate strategies that will help in solving these issues with ease and effectiveness.

Creative Solution: Privacy Policy and Computing Algorithm Management

A significant cause of Facebook’s user privacy issues emanates from the company’s choices in sharing information with third-party computing apps and other businesses. This aspect is primarily absent from the company’s terms and conditions of using its services or even its privacy regulations (Isaak and Hanna, 2018). As a result, some applications, along with Facebook itself, can track the activities that a user undertakes as a part of this program. The company’s first solution is the creation of algorithms that enable the users to manage the type of information that they can share. This approach ensures that Facebook only shares data that the users already know about, which enhances transparency between the two parties. The approach can also facilitate a revenue-sharing methodology where Facebook asks users to participate in survey-like arrangements to provide data for other companies. For instance, a user responds to a set of questions willingly and Facebook sells the results to another advertiser, which promotes transparency between Facebook and its customers. This approach can eliminate the trust issues that users have with the company and provide more privacy control to those customers. Therefore, the creation of better privacy management algorithms and revenue-sharing with users can enable Facebook to overcome its current problem and maintain its vision of expanding profits.

Facebook users have had issues about how the company acquires the information that it shares with other companies. One of the approaches involves the use of third-party applications that monitor subscriber activities and share them with the buyers (Vallina-Rodriguez et al., 2016). For instance, the app can identify different patterns on the likes and comments that a user makes, which forms a good platform for Facebook to provide targeted advertising. Such aspects also enable Facebook to identify consumer patterns and share that information with other producers that intend to advertise on the internet. This approach exposes users to potential fraud and other security risks in the event of a cyber breach on Facebook’s platform. The most appropriate recommendation is to support transparency by auditing those third-party apps and sharing that information with the users (Bonsón, Royo, and Ratkai, 2015). For instance, Facebook enforces laws that require the app owners to provide information about themselves, auditing that data, make it visible to users, and allow those subscribers to choose the ones that are the most appropriate for them. This approach enables the users to control the amount of information they can share with the knowledge of who holds it. This methodology is essential to support the objective of improving the operational algorithms and monitoring data-sharing processes. As a result, Facebook would have improved customer trust and served its profit bottom line effectively.

Regulations are necessary to ensure that Facebook implements and adheres to the new resolutions on data issues. As a result, the company should proceed towards adopting and implementing privacy and data-sharing policies to manage the new activities that it chooses as solutions to the current problem (Bierer, Crosas, and Pierce, 2017). Such regulations are essential as a tool to guide the relevant actions on the part of the company and the consumers as well. The presence of such policies also eases Facebook’s engagement with data buyers from its platforms as a way of ensuring that it operates within the ethical framework. As a result, consultations are necessary between all the stakeholders to facilitate the creation and selection of laws that are the most appropriate to all the relevant participants. These policies should aim at improving accountability between the company and its consumers on both sides of the data-sharing spectrum. The regulations should emphasize user autonomy in choosing the information that they can share, which improves trust. The policies should also clarify the litigation that the company holds in the event of violations along with an assessment of the liabilities of both the subscribers and the third-party information buyers. Developing a regulatory framework is then necessary to establish the correct implementation and monitoring strategies for Facebook’s resolutions to its privacy issues.

Innovation Action Plan

Various steps are necessary for implementing the solutions on Facebook’s user privacy challenge. The first action involves the creation of policies to provide an avenue that facilitates other activities in changing algorithms and revenue-sharing. Every plan needs a clear needs assessment through collaborative evaluations of feedback from different stakeholders to ensure that the choices reflect the pertinent requirements (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart, and Wright, 2017). Therefore, Facebook should consult its consumers from both sides of the privacy standoff and include the internal input of its people to map the way forward. The responses that the company will collect from these exercises may highlight some of the critical areas that the policies have to tackle. This approach will require the company to revise its existing regulations and determine any improvements or adjustments that are also necessary. The consultations will be necessary to ensure that Facebook users offer their input and contribute to the creation of regulations that reflect their desires in social media use. The process of needs assessment and policy development may take up to six months due to the breadth of target audiences that Facebook has to consult.

The development of policies will pave a way for addressing the specific privacy issues by developing the relevant algorithms that will control data-sharing and facilitate revenue-sharing for the users. The next step will then involve the creation of privacy algorithms that prevent Facebook from automatically sharing user information without the knowledge of the particular subscriber. This aspect will go along with the presence of a policy that outlines the punishments for Facebook in the event that it violates that agreement (Flick, 2016). This aspect targets Facebook itself by establishing methodologies that increase transactional transparency. These algorithms should enable every user to track the activities that Facebook has undertaken on their account with the option to approve and disapprove them accordingly. Data buyers also get to monitor the activities that generate their information, which enables them to evaluate reliability and validity. This aspect will follow the regular online software design process and take about four months for creation and testing. Therefore, the data-sharing algorithms will be necessary to offer participants better control of the flow of information, improve transparency, and enhance consumer trust in Facebook.

Profits are an integral component of any business including Facebook. The final part of this action plan will involve the creation of a revenue-sharing algorithm for users that could intend to sell their data to specific organizations through Facebook. This arrangement will focus Facebook users the right autonomy to determine what kind of information they are willing to provide to third-party buyers with the presence of tools to enhance accountability. The targets of this action will be both subscribers and third-party buyers where Facebook intends to provide ethical connections between those consumers. Charging the data-sharing process offers a series of benefits to both the company and its users, thus working perfectly towards helping solve the social responsibility issue. This action will take up to three months to implement effectively since Facebook already has the relevant infrastructure. The revenue-sharing arrangement will enable Facebook to lead the other technology companies in terms of availing big data for analytical purposes to various other businesses.

Innovation Leadership

Facebook’s current challenge in data privacy and ownership encompasses a broad range of participants standing as its consumers. For instance, social network users are the company’s main customers while third-party data buyers and another set of clients that the organization has to consider in its resolutions. As a result, this innovation will require intensive inclusivity between the firm’s workforce, consumers, and governmental agencies in its target markets (Javed, Naqvi, Khan, Arjoon, and Tayyeb, 2017). This approach will be necessary in helping the company overcome some of the challenges that it is likely to face due to the implementation of new methodologies. For instance, the company will need to tackle the aspect of potentially losing data buyers as a result of its changes in tracking users and sharing their personal information. This aspect makes the revenue-sharing resolution an important approach to overcome that issue. However, the move may translate to higher expenses for the third-party buyers since Facebook has to compensate users as well. Therefore, a consultative and inclusive process is necessary to establish an agreeable condition between the three parties. Therefore, inclusive leadership is the most appropriate strategy when a firm needs to ensure collaborative evaluation of feedback from different participants in making decisions (Javed et al., 2017). Facebook should therefore use this approach to enable it to encompass the visions of its diverse consumer base along with internal stakeholders. Inclusivity is the most appropriate in this context since Facebook’s threat emanates primarily from the lack of transparency in decision-making processes.

The Innovation Implementation Process

Various requirements are necessary to ensure the appropriate implementation of Facebook’s resolutions to privacy issues. The action plan highlights the three significant tasks that include policy creation, developing data-sharing algorithms, and introducing revenue-sharing incentives for users. All those activities intend to make sure that the company adheres to the regulatory framework, acts transparently regarding user data, and offers subscribers control and autonomy over the information that is available for sharing. The plan indicates that the activities will take up to 13 months to be completed. However, the company can shorten this period by developing the policies first, and then handling the algorithm creation and revenue-sharing exercises concurrently. Various resources are essential to ensure that Facebook implements the action plan effectively. Human resources play a significant role in facilitating relevant activities in most business projects (Giardino, Paternoster, Unterkalmsteiner, Gorschek, and Abrahamsson, 2016). As a result, Facebook needs to identify and implement the most appropriate teams that can handle the different actions that this proposal highlights. The process will involve consulting with internal stakeholders, government agencies, and customers, which necessitates the creation of an adequate plan to accommodate all those participants in the program. Computer software and hardware facilities will be necessary to facilitate the programming activities in creating the right algorithms. Financial support will also be necessary to adequately handle this project especially due to the duration that it takes and the resources that it requires.

The second phase of the implementation aims at ensuring the continuity of the program for purposes of enabling Facebook attain sustainability in all its decisions and operations. The first action of this stage will involve improving employee preparedness for the shifts in operational methodologies due to the new policies and software alterations. Training programs will be an essential element of change management to ensure that staff members acquire the relevant skills to tackle workplace shifts and enhance performance (Noe et al., 2017). Therefore, Facebook is expected to invest in instructional activities that will educate its employees on the pertinent requirements. This aspect will be useful for customer service staff that will also educate the users and respond to any queries. The second action involves evaluating the new processes to ensure that they meet the dynamically changing demands of the consumer market. For instance, the legal teams should regularly check the policies to ensure that they meet the external regulatory environment and consumer requirements. The company is also required to offer regular reports on-site for users to evaluate and escalate any issues for resolution. Furthermore, Facebook is required to release financial reports that cover the relevant privacy aspects to the public to promote transparency. These approaches will be necessary to improve user trust and enable Facebook to maintain its competitive edge.

Conclusion

Facebook is one of the leading online social networks in the world, which implies its broad range of users. As a result, the company faces various risks relating to the preferences that its consumers hold. This assessment identifies that Facebook experiences the threat of losing most of its users due to privacy and data ownership issues that have led to a breach of trust between the two parties. The evaluation identifies three solutions with the first one focusing on developing algorithms that provide data-sharing autonomy to Facebook’s users with a possible revenue-sharing arrangement. The second solution involves improving third-party application audits and allowing Facebook subscribers to control their subscriptions. The third solution highlights a revision of the current privacy policies at Facebook and offering alternatives that enhance accountability between both parties. These approaches can enable Facebook to set itself in line with the growth of big data benefits while alleviating its problems in user privacy.

Recommendation

For purposes of improving the effectives and efficiency of the implementation process, the following recommendations should be considered by the organization.

Adopt some of the best and most effective awareness programs for all involved parties

Work on improving privacy levels for each account owner

Adopt the right employee training programs

Set aside adequate resources to implement the set security strategies, and

Offer regular reports on-site for users to evaluate and escalate any issues for resolution

The adoption of these strategies will definitely help the company significantly in achieving everything that it requires to solve the security issues at hand.

References

Benjelloun, F.Z., Lahcen, A.A. and Belfkih, S., 2015, March. An overview of big data opportunities, applications and tools. In 2015 Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Bierer, B.E., Crosas, M. and Pierce, H.H., 2017. Data authorship as an incentive to data sharing.

Bonsón, E., Royo, S. and Ratkai, M., 2015. Citizens’ engagement on local governments’ Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), pp.52-62.

Flick, C., 2016. Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Research Ethics, 12(1), pp.14-28.

Gabriel, T., 2018. Attention brands: Young Americans are breaking up with Facebook. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 25 Mar. 2019]

Giardino, C., Paternoster, N., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T. and Abrahamsson, P., 2016. Software development in startup companies: the Greenfield startup model. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 42(6), pp.585-604.

Isaak, J. and Hanna, M.J., 2018. User Data Privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and Privacy Protection. Computer, 51(8), pp.56-59.

Javed, B., Naqvi, S.M.M.R., Khan, A.K., Arjoon, S. and Tayyeb, H.H., 2017. Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety. Journal of Management & Organization, pp.1-20.

Noe, R.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Gerhart, B. and Wright, P.M., 2017. Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

Statista, 2019. Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2019, ranked by number of active users (in millions). [Online] Available at: [Accessed 25 Mar. 2019].

Vallina-Rodriguez, N., Sundaresan, S., Razaghpanah, A., Nithyanand, R., Allman, M., Kreibich, C. and Gill, P., 2016. Tracking the trackers: Towards understanding the mobile advertising and tracking ecosystem. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.07190.

Appendix

This project used brainstorming to develop ideas that would facilitate the identification of the most appropriate solution for Facebook’s privacy issues. The process began with an evaluation of the problem using various internet sources such as news articles and research publications about the problem. This step was necessary to determine the particular responses the company and other relevant stakeholders had taken to deal with the issue. The evaluation also facilitated the identification of the potential solutions that other people had provided on the same problem. This step also focused on identifying strategies that other companies were using to deal with privacy and data ownership issues with their subscribers. As a result, the investigator made a list of the most potent ideas and started assessing those that were the most appropriate to the contextual conditions that Facebook was facing. This aspect necessitated the removal of methodologies that did not meet Facebook’s strategic vision or even its business model. For instance, an assumption that the company can monetize user subscriptions and exclude subscribers from data-sharing. However, this aspect would increase the problem as most Facebook users are on the platform since it is free. The process continued to evaluating the most appropriate ideas and determining their implementation in the company. The brainstorming process identified the ideas of improving privacy policies and developing data-sharing protocols and algorithms as the most relevant for the problem and proceeded to propose action and implementation plans. The investigator then proceeded to evaluate the best parameters that would facilitate monitoring and evaluation to enhance the adoption of the plans into the company. The brainstorming process is then an essential methodology for solving critical problems by identifying multiple solutions and selecting the most appropriate ones.

Resolving Facebook’s Privacy Issues to Retain Users11 INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE COMMUNICATION Name Class

Wildland Fire Mitigation – How to conduct it, and implement a risk reduction plan for wildland fire mitigation, identify Writing Assignment Help Resolving Facebook’s Privacy Issues to Retain Users11

INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE COMMUNICATION

Name

Class

Tutor

School, City

Date

Table of Contents

Introduction 2

Innovation Challenge: Facebook’s Privacy Issues 3

Creative Solution: Privacy Policy and Computing Algorithm Management 4

Innovation Action Plan 6

Innovation Leadership 8

The Innovation Implementation 8

Conclusion 10

Recommendation 10

References 12

Introduction

The contemporary business environment is dynamic with various elements in the markets shifting, sometimes in favor of or against different firms. However, one important attribute that is constant for all industries is that consumer appeal is an integral component for ensuring the longevity of any business, regardless of the target market. Technology companies face multiple risks that they have to navigate, especially when those firms are operating on the international stage with variations in customer preferences. Facebook is one of the social media networks that is undergoing tough times as a result of the business choices it has made intending to expand its revenues. Facebook’s scandals relating to privacy issues pose a significant challenge that encompasses driving away most of its users due to cybersecurity concerns. An assessment of this problem is then necessary to facilitate the development and implementation of an innovative solution to enable Facebook to overcome this challenge.

Innovation Challenge: Facebook’s Privacy Issues

Social media has become an integral element among most young people as a way to network and communicate with other people. Facebook is the leading social networking website by the number of subscribers as of March 2019 (Statista, 2019). This attribute places significant responsibilities on the company to protect its reputation and maintain an edge in a competitive market. However, Facebook has constantly fallen into a series of issues relating to cybersecurity, which is a major concern among most internet users (Gabriel, 2018). The data privacy scandal in 2018 rocked Facebook when revelations indicated that the company had sold user information to Cambridge Analytica to facilitate campaign propaganda in different countries (Isaak and Hanna, 2018). Facebook faces another challenge of using algorithms that share user information with advertisers to improve the accuracy of targeted campaigns within the network (Vallina-Rodriguez et al., 2016). Facebook has been sluggish in handling both cases despite the Senate hearing in the United States (US) aiming to increase the company’s accountability. As a result, most users have resorted to leaving the social network for fear of exposure to cybercriminals and other privacy issues. Most of them have lost trust in Facebook as it has shown to disregard the users’ safety and prioritize its profits bottom line. The company also faces the challenge of legal litigation in the event of governmental intervention, which could translate into significant expenditures. This problem escalates through the fact that Facebook operates in multiple countries, which increases the potential for various lawsuits. As a result, an assessment of potential solutions is necessary to enable the company to overcome the privacy issues and regain the trust of its customers and administrations.

Creative Solution: Privacy Policy and Computing Algorithm Management

A significant cause of Facebook’s user privacy issues emanates from the company’s choices in sharing information with third-party computing apps and other businesses. This aspect is primarily absent from the company’s terms and conditions of using its services or even its privacy regulations (Isaak and Hanna, 2018). As a result, some applications, along with Facebook itself, can track the activities that a user undertakes as a part of this program. The company’s first solution is the creation of algorithms that enable the users to manage the type of information that they can share. This approach ensures that Facebook only shares data that the users already know about, which enhances transparency between the two parties. The approach can also facilitate a revenue-sharing methodology where Facebook asks users to participate in survey-like arrangements to provide data for other companies. For instance, a user responds to a set of questions willingly and Facebook sells the results to another advertiser, which promotes transparency between Facebook and its customers. This approach can eliminate the trust issues that users have with the company and provide more privacy control to those customers. Therefore, the creation of better privacy management algorithms and revenue-sharing with users can enable Facebook to overcome its current problem and maintain its vision of expanding profits.

Facebook users have had issues about how the company acquires the information that it shares with other companies. One of the approaches involves the use of third-party applications that monitor subscriber activities and share them with the buyers (Vallina-Rodriguez et al., 2016). For instance, the app can identify different patterns on the likes and comments that a user makes, which forms a good platform for Facebook to provide targeted advertising. Such aspects also enable Facebook to identify consumer patterns and share that information with other producers that intend to advertise on the internet. This approach exposes users to potential fraud and other security risks in the event of a cyber breach on Facebook’s platform. The most appropriate recommendation is to support transparency by auditing those third-party apps and sharing that information with the users (Bonsón, Royo, and Ratkai, 2015). For instance, Facebook enforces laws that require the app owners to provide information about themselves, auditing that data, make it visible to users, and allow those subscribers to choose the ones that are the most appropriate for them. This approach enables the users to control the amount of information they can share with the knowledge of who holds it. This methodology is essential to support the objective of improving the operational algorithms and monitoring data-sharing processes. As a result, Facebook would have improved customer trust and served its profit bottom line effectively.

Regulations are necessary to ensure that Facebook implements and adheres to the new resolutions on data issues. As a result, the company should proceed towards adopting and implementing privacy and data-sharing policies to manage the new activities that it chooses as solutions to the current problem (Bierer, Crosas, and Pierce, 2017). Such regulations are essential as a tool to guide the relevant actions on the part of the company and the consumers as well. The presence of such policies also eases Facebook’s engagement with data buyers from its platforms as a way of ensuring that it operates within the ethical framework. As a result, consultations are necessary between all the stakeholders to facilitate the creation and selection of laws that are the most appropriate to all the relevant participants. These policies should aim at improving accountability between the company and its consumers on both sides of the data-sharing spectrum. The regulations should emphasize user autonomy in choosing the information that they can share, which improves trust. The policies should also clarify the litigation that the company holds in the event of violations along with an assessment of the liabilities of both the subscribers and the third-party information buyers. Developing a regulatory framework is then necessary to establish the correct implementation and monitoring strategies for Facebook’s resolutions to its privacy issues.

Innovation Action Plan

Various steps are necessary for implementing the solutions on Facebook’s user privacy challenge. The first action involves the creation of policies to provide an avenue that facilitates other activities in changing algorithms and revenue-sharing. Every plan needs a clear needs assessment through collaborative evaluations of feedback from different stakeholders to ensure that the choices reflect the pertinent requirements (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart, and Wright, 2017). Therefore, Facebook will consult its consumers from both sides of the privacy standoff and include the internal input of its people to map the way forward. The responses that the company collects from these exercises may highlight some of the critical areas that the policies have to tackle. This approach also requires a revision of the existing regulations and determine any improvements or adjustments that are also necessary. The consultations are necessary to ensure that Facebook users offer their input and contribute to the creation of regulations that reflect their desires in social media use. The process of needs assessment and policy development may take up to six months due to the breadth of target audiences that Facebook has to consult.

The creation of policies paves the way for addressing the specific privacy issues by developing the relevant algorithms that will control data-sharing and facilitate revenue-sharing for the users. The next step will then involve the creation of privacy algorithms that prevent Facebook from automatically sharing user information without the knowledge of the particular subscriber. This aspect goes along with the presence of a policy that outlines the punishments for Facebook in the event that it violates that agreement (Flick, 2016). This aspect targets Facebook itself by establishing methodologies that increase transactional transparency. These algorithms should enable every user to track the activities that Facebook has undertaken on their account with the option to approve and disapprove them accordingly. Data buyers also get to monitor the activities that generate their information, which enables them to evaluate reliability and validity. This aspect will follow the regular online software design process and take about four months for creation and testing. Therefore, the data-sharing algorithms are necessary to offer participants better control of the flow of information, improve transparency, and enhance consumer trust in Facebook.

Profits are an integral component of any business, which includes Facebook. The final part of this action plan involves the creation of a revenue-sharing algorithm for users that could intend to sell their data to specific organizations through Facebook. This arrangement focuses on offering autonomy to Facebook users to determine what kind of information they are willing to provide to third-party buyers with the presence of tools to enhance accountability. The targets of this action are both subscribers and third-party buyers where Facebook intends to provide ethical connections between those consumers. Monetizing data-sharing aims at incentivizing that activity to offer benefits to both the company and all its clientele without violating any agreements (Benjelloun, Lahcen, and Belfkih, 2015). This action can take up to three months to implement effectively since Facebook already has the relevant infrastructure. The revenue-sharing arrangement can enable Facebook to lead the other technology companies in terms of availing big data for analytical purposes to various other businesses.

Innovation Leadership

Facebook’s current challenge in data privacy and ownership encompasses a broad range of participants standing as its consumers. For instance, social network users are the company’s main customers while third-party data buyers and another set of clients that the organization has to consider in its resolutions. As a result, this innovation requires intensive inclusivity between the firm’s workforce, consumers, and governmental agencies in its target markets (Javed, Naqvi, Khan, Arjoon, and Tayyeb, 2017). This approach is necessary to overcome some of the challenges that it is likely to face due to the implementation of new methodologies. For instance, the company has to tackle the aspect of potentially losing data buyers as a result of its changes in tracking users and sharing their personal information. This aspect makes the revenue-sharing resolution an important approach to overcome that issue. However, the move may translate to higher expenses for the third-party buyers since Facebook has to compensate users as well. Therefore, a consultative and inclusive process is necessary to establish an agreeable condition between the three parties. Therefore, inclusive leadership is the most appropriate strategy when a firm needs to ensure collaborative evaluation of feedback from different participants in making decisions (Javed et al., 2017). Facebook should use this approach to enable it to encompass the visions of its diverse consumer base along with internal stakeholders. Inclusivity is the most appropriate in this context since Facebook’s threat emanates primarily from the lack of transparency in decision-making processes.

The Innovation Implementation

Various requirements are necessary to ensure the appropriate implementation of Facebook’s resolutions to privacy issues. The action plan highlights the three significant tasks that include policy creation, developing data-sharing algorithms, and introducing revenue-sharing incentives for users. All those activities intend to ensure that the company adheres to the regulatory framework, acts transparently regarding user data, and offers subscribers control and autonomy over the information that is available for sharing. The plan indicates that the activities can take up to 13 months if completed separately. However, the company can shorten this period by developing the policies first, and then handling the algorithm creation and revenue-sharing exercises concurrently. Various resources are essential to ensure that Facebook implements the action plan effectively. Human resources play a significant role in facilitating relevant activities in most business projects (Giardino, Paternoster, Unterkalmsteiner, Gorschek, and Abrahamsson, 2016). As a result, Facebook needs to identify and implement the most appropriate teams that can handle the different actions that this proposal highlights. The process involves consultations with internal stakeholders, government agencies, and customers, which necessitates the creation of an adequate plan to accommodate all those participants in the program. Computer software and hardware facilities are necessary to facilitate the programming activities in creating relevant algorithms. Financial support is necessary to adequately handle this project especially due to the duration that it takes and the resources that it requires.

The second phase of the implementation plan aims at ensuring the continuity of the program to enable Facebook to attain sustainability in its decisions. The first action of this stage involves improving employee preparedness for the shifts in operational methodologies due to the new policies and software alterations. Training programs are an essential element of change management to ensure that staff members acquire the relevant skills to tackle workplace shifts and enhance performance (Noe et al., 2017). Therefore, Facebook should invest in instructional activities that will educate its employees on the pertinent requirements. This aspect is particularly useful for customer service staff that will also educate the users and respond to any queries. The second action involves evaluating the new processes to ensure that they meet the dynamically changing demands of the consumer market. For instance, the legal teams should regularly check the policies to ensure that they meet the external regulatory environment and consumer requirements. The company should also offer regular reports on-site for users to evaluate and escalate any issues for resolution. Furthermore, Facebook should release financial reports that cover the relevant privacy aspects to the public to promote transparency. These approaches are necessary to improve user trust and enable Facebook to maintain its competitive edge.

Conclusion

Facebook is one of the leading online social networks in the world, which implies its broad range of users. As a result, the company faces various risks relating to the preferences that its consumers hold. This assessment identifies that Facebook experiences the threat of losing most of its users due to privacy and data ownership issues that have led to a breach of trust between the two parties. The evaluation identifies three solutions with the first one focusing on developing algorithms that provide data-sharing autonomy to Facebook’s users with a possible revenue-sharing arrangement. The second solution involves improving third-party application audits and allowing Facebook subscribers to control their subscriptions. The third solution highlights a revision of the current privacy policies at Facebook and offering alternatives that enhance accountability between both parties. These approaches can enable Facebook to set itself in line with the growth of big data benefits while alleviating its problems in user privacy.

Recommendation

For purposes of improving the effectives and efficiency of the implementation process, the following recommendations should be considered by the organization.

Adopt some of the best and most effective awareness programs for all involved parties

Work on improving privacy levels for each account owner

Adopt the right employee training programs

Set aside adequate resources to implement the set security strategies, and

Offer regular reports on-site for users to evaluate and escalate any issues for resolution

The adoption of these strategies will definitely help the company significantly in achieving everything that it requires to solve the security issues at hand.

References

Benjelloun, F.Z., Lahcen, A.A. and Belfkih, S., 2015, March. An overview of big data opportunities, applications and tools. In 2015 Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Bierer, B.E., Crosas, M. and Pierce, H.H., 2017. Data authorship as an incentive to data sharing.

Bonsón, E., Royo, S. and Ratkai, M., 2015. Citizens’ engagement on local governments’ Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), pp.52-62.

Flick, C., 2016. Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Research Ethics, 12(1), pp.14-28.

Gabriel, T., 2018. Attention brands: Young Americans are breaking up with Facebook. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 25 Mar. 2019]

Giardino, C., Paternoster, N., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T. and Abrahamsson, P., 2016. Software development in startup companies: the Greenfield startup model. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 42(6), pp.585-604.

Isaak, J. and Hanna, M.J., 2018. User Data Privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and Privacy Protection. Computer, 51(8), pp.56-59.

Javed, B., Naqvi, S.M.M.R., Khan, A.K., Arjoon, S. and Tayyeb, H.H., 2017. Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety. Journal of Management & Organization, pp.1-20.

Noe, R.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Gerhart, B. and Wright, P.M., 2017. Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

Statista, 2019. Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2019, ranked by number of active users (in millions). [Online] Available at: [Accessed 25 Mar. 2019].

Vallina-Rodriguez, N., Sundaresan, S., Razaghpanah, A., Nithyanand, R., Allman, M., Kreibich, C. and Gill, P., 2016. Tracking the trackers: Towards understanding the mobile advertising and tracking ecosystem. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.07190.

Appendix

This project used brainstorming to develop ideas that would facilitate the identification of the most appropriate solution for Facebook’s privacy issues. The process began with an evaluation of the problem using various internet sources such as news articles and research publications about the problem. This step was necessary to determine the particular responses the company and other relevant stakeholders had taken to deal with the issue. The evaluation also facilitated the identification of the potential solutions that other people had provided on the same problem. This step also focused on identifying strategies that other companies were using to deal with privacy and data ownership issues with their subscribers. As a result, the investigator made a list of the most potent ideas and started assessing those that were the most appropriate to the contextual conditions that Facebook was facing. This aspect necessitated the removal of methodologies that did not meet Facebook’s strategic vision or even its business model. For instance, an assumption that the company can monetize user subscriptions and exclude subscribers from data-sharing. However, this aspect would increase the problem as most Facebook users are on the platform since it is free. The process continued to evaluating the most appropriate ideas and determining their implementation in the company. The brainstorming process identified the ideas of improving privacy policies and developing data-sharing protocols and algorithms as the most relevant for the problem and proceeded to propose action and implementation plans. The investigator then proceeded to evaluate the best parameters that would facilitate monitoring and evaluation to enhance the adoption of the plans into the company. The brainstorming process is then an essential methodology for solving critical problems by identifying multiple solutions and selecting the most appropriate ones.

一、基本情况 学校网址:https://www.usc.edu.au/login 账号:[email protected] 密码:S14-01-79 姓名:Shiyun Liu 学号:1123116 1、作业提交与查重:在Task 1 DRAFT Submission Area查重;在Task

一、基本情况

学校网址:https://www.usc.edu.au/login

账号:[email protected]

密码:S14-01-79

姓名:Shiyun Liu

学号:1123116

1、作业提交与查重:在Task 1 DRAFT Submission Area查重;在Task 1正式提交,查重与正式提交均只能提交一次。在My Interim Results看提交作业情况与成绩,Task 1 DRAFT Submission Area查重的结果。

2、作业邮件标题 :课程名称+第几周作业+学号

3、refrence的写法:正文部分用脚标,不建议用链接的方式。文末对应脚标写出,如下图

二、关于705作业

(一)Task 1-提交750字的博客

第一周至第三周课件中有详细涉及,按照如下四部分内容,对应黑板上所写的四部分内容和结构来写。

比如第三部分 ,引起创新的原因,要选取如下四个原因中的一、两个进行论述

比如第四部分,管理决策的类型,要引用以下其中的类型

三种创新管理决策的路径,要引用如下三种。

描述创新管理决策要引用如下三种理论:

关于Task 1写的好的范文详见《2. Attention Brands_ Young Americans Are Breaking Up With Facebook》,

(二)Task 2——测试(案例分析回答问题,不需要查重,不需要refrence)

第四周至第七周课件中有详细涉及,4月25日给出案例,4月28日提交案例分析,按照类似下图的问题进行回答,每个问题均要回答,5分的题要回答200-300字,10分的题要回答500-600字。

关于创新的类别,在第四周课件中有详细描述,有六种,课件中列出了三种,案例分析的问题有可能会问到其中的三种。

识别创新氛围的关键因素,选取一、两个进行回答的。比如组织架构,复杂的组织架构不利于创新的形成,扁平的组织架构容易创新;团队创新的倡导者具有什么样的特质;顺畅的纵向、横向的沟通;信任,所有的创新有失败风险,领导者鼓励创新,创新失败不会被罚;激励机制的设置;员工成就感;创新过程,持续培训和员工上升通道的过程。

简要解释3种类型的创新(第4周 – 增量,激进和破坏性)。在这种情况下,可以看到这三种创新中的哪一种。使用案例研究中的证据解释您的答案(5)

比较符合格式的回答是,先回答创新有几种类型,每种创新类型的定义。举出案例中属于哪种创新,哪些地方符合这种特征。重点是给的理由足够论述你的论点。

“创新有三个层次:渐进式,激进式和颠覆性。增量,即现有技术,流程,产品和服务的优化。激进创新,只针对原始技术方面的深度变化,不改变商业模式,能够快速看到变化和增长; 颠覆性创新,这是对原始模式的彻底改变,不一定是技术升级; 就STEEL而言,我们看到的是颠覆性的创新。公司从购买铁矿石能源材料的工厂变为出口能源的工厂。他们彻底改变了原材料和能源的使用; 将原材料从铁矿石升级为太阳能,节省成本和改变商业模式。”

2.哪些变革力量迫使怀阿拉钢铁公司和后来的桑杰古普塔改变并做出回应?解释哪些力量是相关的,并从案例研究中提供证据以支持您的答案(5)

识别出来的三种,每一种分段表述,每一种特征,思路清晰。先谈概念,再用案例来论述概念。

“第一个变化的力量是环境,特别是有限的资源和全球变暖逐渐减少,迫使怀阿拉钢铁公司和桑杰古普塔公司改变和应对。为了提高效率和效率,采购后,他们使用回收的废金属作为制造原料(应对日益减少的有限资源),并将太阳能应用于制造业(应对全球变暖)。

第二个变革的力量是技术,特别是技术的快速发展。对于行业而言,在原料问题和电力问题上的技术开发使竞争对手能够降低成本和更环保的业务,这迫使Whyalla和Sanjay Gupta进行改变和响应。当然,作为回应,Gupta已经应用了来自回收废金属和新太阳能的新原料。

第三种变革力量是经济,特别是商业周期和资本流动。作为一个非常传统的行业,商业周期仍然很无聊,但另一方面,也意味着变革的需要。随着国际上的自由资本流动,新的想法和概念也可能为钢铁制造业带来新的机会。这些都是Whyalla Steel和Sanjay Gupta的变化。为了应对,他们采用了新原料和新能源降低制造成本的新思路。此外,随着自由资本流动,Gupta与一家法国公司合作,拥有先进的太阳能发电技术,并试图为整个澳大利亚制造业提供清洁,廉价和可再生能源。”

问题3:在培养促进创新的气氛方面,有几个关键因素很重要(第5周 – 第7章)。选择其中两个与案例研究相关的因素,并分析Greensteel如何利用这些因素培育创新氛围。(5)

回答:

我们可以看到的第一个因素是收购后结构发生变化,他们以50.1%的股份在当地购买了一家可再生能源公司,并成立了一家新的合资公司SIMEC Zen Energy,这有助于调整两家公司的能力,同时促进了建造78,000块太阳能电池板,电池和水力设施。2018年5月,Gupta与法国可再生能源公司Neoen签订协议,承包Laverton和墨尔本钢铁厂的权力,这使得该业务能够在整个澳大利亚实现,并在以后扩展到全球。

第二个因素是促进Whyalla钢厂创新的动力,这种可再生能源太阳能支持南澳大利亚其他地区的扩张,为南澳五大公司提供廉价的太阳能,这有助于将电力成本削减高达50%。

(三)Task 3——报告(2500字,选以下三个方向之一的方向(第八周课件)确定企业战略解决方案,列出都有哪几种解决方案,选择哪一种或者哪几种方案组合,理由是什么,要有理论依据——13个战略创新模型步骤(第九周课件:创新行动计划,领导力、执行力,13个战略创新模型步骤,从第4-9步每一步要谈到),把所学综合在一起)

第八周至第十二周课件中有详细涉及作业要求。

13个战略创新模型步骤,从第4-9步每一步要谈到。

作业的结构内容比重如下:

criteria

which section of the sample report? GroutPro

Which Week is relevant?
Chapter / Reading?

分数占比

C1.Innovation challenge- problem

2 

 Week1/2

15%

C2. Creative solution

3+附件

 Week3书90-94页

25%

C3. Strategic innovation model – action plan

4 

 Week9

15%

C4. Leadership

5 

 Week10

15%

C5. Strategic innovation model- implementation

6

 Week9

15%

C6. Professional presentation

 

 

案例分析报告(reports)的结构(不是全部)

封面:课程名、老师、学号

摘要:总结放在最前面,不超过一页

目录:(不算字数)

1、introduction,写报告的目的,研究的意义。

2、Body:

3、Conlusion:一定是前面提到部分的结论

4、Recommendation:今后要做的部分

5、Refrences:(不算字数)作业3至少要有8个,具体格式可见“学术诚信”里的 Harvard Referencing Quick guide.

6、Appendices:附件,图形图表(不算字数)

第九周去讨论区,发送作业3的所选方向的主题贴子。Blackbord的内容每周会更新。

10 Name Course Institution Date Introduction An insurance contract is an agreement

10

Name

Course

Institution

Date

Introduction

An insurance contract is an agreement between parties where one party pays an amount of money to the other for the purposes of indemnifying him or her when certain risks occur. The money paid, known as premium, is paid on a regular basis. The party paying the premium is referred to as the insured person. The person receiving the premium is known as the insurer. Indemnity refers to the act of being restituted or being returned to the original position or situation that one was in before the occurrence of a certain event. Things capable of being insured include property and people. Insurance contracts are aimed at reducing risks.The laws on insurance are built upon the laws of contract. This means that the laws of contract must be enshrined and upheld in the execution of insurance contracts.

Types of insurance contracts include: life insurance, motor vehicle insurance and health insurance. Insurance contracts have proven to be effective in reducing risks. Several principles govern insurance contracts. They include: subrogation, indemnity, utmost good faith, warranties, return of premium, proximate cause, assignment and nomination and insurable interest. Insurable interest refers to interests or rights that can be protected in the person or property being insured. It means therefore that the insured must possess some rights capable of being insured in the subject matter of the insurance contract. This means that if the subject matter is destroyed, the beneficiary of the insurance is likely to suffer some economic loss or harm. The insurable interest property distinguishes insurance contracts from mere wagers.

A Life Insurance contract is an agreement entered into by a party to ensure that a third party is compensated upon the death of the party. The party paying the premium is the insured party. The premiums paid act as consideration for the contract. The party set to get compensation is the beneficiary. Death is a risk that may affect third party. It is a contract that creates a binding legal relationship between a party to a contract and a third party. The third party in this case is the beneficiary.

Automatic insurable interest refers to insurable interest that is usually presumed to be possessed by certain individuals. It mostly applies in cases of life insurance. It mostly applies to individuals who have a close relationship with the person being insured. It is assumed that the death of the insured will lead to automatic economic loss or harm to the individual. The law therefore does not require that they be named beneficiaries of the contract. They are automatically presumed to be beneficiaries. The insurance company will therefore have the legal obligation to compensate them in the event of the death of the insured.

Natural affection refers to mutual love and affection that exists between people who are closely related. It refers to the close bonds that arise from family relationships. It is a bond that occurs naturally. It results in close and dependent relationships. It is very strong and members with natural affection feel allied and tied to one another. It brings life to the adage that blood is indeed thicker than water.

A bill was passed stating the there are only two categories of people who have automatic insurable interest in each other due to natural affection. The first category is persons who are and treated as a child or grandchild of insured. The second category is persons who is or lives as a spouse or civil partner of the insured. Are these two categories enough for the purpose of establishing automatic insurable interests due to natural affection? Should these categories be added or expanded? This paper seeks to carefully analyze the repercussions of the proposed bill and if any amendments should be made.

Analysis

Death is an occurrence that is bound to happen to every human. It heavily affects relatives and dependants of the deceased. They have to make funeral arrangements. These arrangements are usually expensive. It is therefore best that one be prepared for it. One of the ways people do this is through execution of life insurance contracts. Execution of Life Insurance contracts started becoming common during World War II. During this period, many people died and its effects were devastating to those left behind. Therefore there was a need to prepare for death. These kinds of contracts ensure that close relatives and dependants of the deceased are compensated. It reduces the financial burden bestowed upon them .It therefore reduces the pain caused by death to some extent. Over the years, the demand for life insurance contracts has been and is still vastly increasing. This is because the causes of death are increasing day by day. There is therefore the need to analyze and develop the laws governing execution of Life Insurance contracts.

Life insurance contracts are agreements entered into by parties requiring one party to pay premiums to the other. In the case the party dies, beneficiaries of the contract are required to get compensation. The party paying premiums is the insured. The party to pay compensation is the insurer. The beneficiaries are usually nominated and stated in the contract by the insured. The compensation is a way to indemnify or bring some restitution to those nominated by the insured upon his or her death.

In some instances, beneficiaries are not nominated by the insured. The insured may also leave out his or her dependants accidentally. Life Insurance contracts being governed by the law of contracts would only recognize people nominated. This ended up disadvantaging dependants of the insured. It defeated the whole purpose of Life Insurance contracts. There was therefore need to cure this defect in law. Presumptions of insured interests were developed to cure this defect. Presumptions are assumptions of facts made by law. This means that presumptions are facts that do not require proof to be established. Presumptions of insured interests are established insured interests that do not require proof. They are assumed to exist.

Presumptions of Insured interests are no standard and vary from one country to the other. It adds beneficiaries to Life Insurance contracts. These are beneficiaries who are presumed to have automatic eligibility to the compensation because they are presumed to have automatic insurable interest. This rule was developed to encompass close relatives and dependants of the insured. They are people who are presumed to suffer some economic loss upon the demise of the insured. A bill was drafted to identify two categories of persons to possess automatic insurable interest. The first category is persons who are and treated as child and grandchild of the insured. The second category is persons who are and treated as spouse or civil partner of the insured.

In the first category, a child and grandchild are justified to have automatic insurable interest. This is because they have a close relation with the insured. A child is any person who has not attained the age of majority. A grandchild is an offspring of a person’s child. These two relationships with the insured are ones of dependency and closeness. The child and grandchild are most of the time dependants of the insured. They are also close in line in the family tree of the insured. They should therefore possess automatic insurable interests in Life Insurance contracts.

The second category involves spouses and civil partners. A spouse refers to a person who is party to a valid marriage contract. The spouses are usually of opposite sexes. For Instance, if person A is spouse to person B, person A and B are of opposite sexes. A civil partner refers to a party to a valid marriage contract. The civil partners are usually of the same sex. It applies to same sex unions. For Instance, if person A is a civil partner to person B, person A and B are of similar sex. Spouses and civil partners enjoy a close dependant relationship with the insured. Marriage contracts usually embody the doctrine of coverture that binds the parties to be one. This means that the parties are close and dependent upon one another. It is therefore justified that spouses and civil partners possess automatic insurable interests in Life Insurance contracts.

In my opinion, the above drafted bill takes a very narrow approach to the interpretation of automatic insurable interests. The purpose of automatic insurable interests was to cater for dependants of the deceased. It only recognizes two types of dependants of the insured. The insured may have other relatives who are heavily dependent on him or her. They too stand a chance of economic loss and hardship upon the death of the deceased. The above drafted bill excludes them. The bill if incorporated into law as it will result in injustice and discrimination. The law would be a tool to propagate injustice and discrimination.

I believe a wider approach to the interpretation of automatic insurable interests should be adopted. This will create an avenue for more dependants to be covered by the life insurance contracts. This will also help effectively achieve the purpose of automatic insurable interests, which is to benefit dependants and people with close relations with the insured.

Recommendations

Human beings are social beings and their lives are usually governed by many social relationships with other human beings. The basic unit of social life is the family unit. The family comprises of two types of settings. There is the nuclear family setting and the extended family setting. These are very important in one’s life. They often lead to close and dependent relationships. This means that most family members are dependent upon each other. The above drafted bill only recognizes part of the family. It leaves out other members of the family. These members in their own right deserve automatic insurable interests in Life Insurance contracts.

A typical nuclear family setting comprises of a father, a mother and siblings. It is considered to be the most basic family setting. Members of the nuclear family have legal obligations to each other. Several relationships also arise as a result of it. There is parent and child relationship, sibling and sibling relationship and spousal relationship. Spousal relationship has been catered for in the drafted bill.

The parent and child relationship has only been recognized partially in the bill. It recognizes children of the insured. It does not however, recognize the parents of the insured. The parents include the father and the mother. Parents nurture their children to maturity. A close bond between parents and children develops naturally. Most parents are dependent on their children during their old age. This is because at this age, they may not be able to earn a living for themselves. They therefore most of the times, end up depending on their children for their daily needs. Upon death of their children, they are left disadvantaged. The bill should therefore include them in its provisions.

Siblings refer to one’s brothers and sisters. Siblings grow up together. Most of the time a close bond results between them. The older siblings most of the times take care of their younger siblings. This is mostly experienced in situations where their parents have passed away. If one of them is not doing well financially, naturally the other sibling steps in to help. These are just two examples of the many instances that sibling relationships become dependent ones. The drafted bill does not give provisions for siblings to have automatic insurable interests. It is therefore a huge disservice to them. They are excluded from benefiting from Life Insurance contracts despite their clear dependency on the insured person. It should therefore be amended to include them.

The extended family is a wider family setting compared to the nuclear family setting. It has so many members. Some members of the extended family include uncles and cousins. Being family members, their bond is also strong. Some may even become close and dependent upon each other. An example of such closeness and dependency is when a person supports his or her cousin through law school. The drafted bill does not recognize them as close family and dependants of the insured person. This is a clear exclusion of people deserving of that benefit. The drafted bill should be amended to include members of the extended family who are dependent on the insured person.

Conclusion

Automatic insurable interest is an important aspect of life insurance contracts. They are aimed at guaranteeing close relatives and dependants of the insured of indemnity upon the death of the insured person. This is in case they are not named as beneficiaries in the life insurance contracts. The drafted bill recognizes automatic insurable interests. It recognizes people who are or treated as children or grandchildren of the insured person. It also recognizes people who are spouses or civil partners of the insured person. It leaves out other close and dependent relationships such as relationships between siblings.

It therefore gives a narrow interpretation to it. The law should be just. It should also ensure equality and eliminate discrimination. It should not be a tool for exclusion and injustice in society. A broader or wider interpretation should therefore be adopted. This will ensure that it encompasses all the other close and dependent relationships of the insured. It should include parents, siblings and members of the extended family who are dependent on the insured person. They too deserve protection from the law. This will ensure that the purpose of automatic insurable interest is achieved effectively.

The drafted bill should therefore be amended.

Bibliograpghy

Legislation

Statutes

Children and Families Act, 2014

Secondary Sources

Francois Ewold, ‘Insurance and risk’ (1991) LJ 197

Gupta P., Insurance and risk Management ( 2011 Himalayan Books) 2

Hugh Fegan, ‘Notes on the Development of the Doctrine of Insurance Interest’ (1919) Geo. LJ 1

Jacob Loshin, ‘Insurance law’s hapless busybody: a case against the insurable interest requirement.’ (2007) 117 Yale LJ 474

Li Donghui, Fariborz Moshirian, Pascal Nguyen and Timothy Wee, ‘The demand for life insurance’ (2007) JRI 637

Lionel Macedo, The Role of the Underwriter in Insurance ( first published 2009 The World Bank 2009) Emeric Fischer, ‘The rule of insurable interest and the principle of indemnity: are they measures of damages in property insurance’ (1980) 56 Ind. LJ 445

Mark Browne and Kim Kihong, ‘An international analysis of life insurance demand’ (1993) JRI 616

Oxford Dictionary of English ( 3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2010)1067

Case Study Questions 7 CASE STUDY QUESTIONS Name:liushiyun Institution Professor (Tutor) Course:BUS705

Case Study Questions 7

CASE STUDY QUESTIONS

Name:liushiyun

Institution

Professor (Tutor)

Course:BUS705

City/State:ShenZhen

Date:2019/4/28

Diagnose forces of change in the men’s shirt industry and give your reasoned opinion on how this influences the attractiveness of the Plastiwear opportunity

The fashion industry is always influenced by different forces that always work towards bringing about some serious changes in the industry. Some of the key forces of change that have been identified to have some serious change effect in the men’s shirt industry include age uncertainties amongst the targeted customers, presence of either high quality or poor quality shirts in the market and high competitions levels that is always accompanied by a significant increase in technological adoptions in different countries meant to improve either the quality or quantity of a product (Bailetti, and Guild, 1991, p. 92). Digital upgrade has also been considered an important force that affects the men’s shirt industry significantly. Changes in technology have also been considered an important force affecting the men’s shirt industry right from the production stage to the marketing phase. The adoption of contemporary technologies in the men’s shirt industry has led to the development of some improved shirt designs while at the same time improving an organization’s marketing opportunities and channels, a move that has improved both the productivity and efficiency of the sector (Bates, and Khasawneh, 2005, p. 105).

These forces of change have influenced the attractiveness of the Platiwear opportunity by helping those involved to come up with some improved designs that will definitely appeal to the organization’s target market. Additionally, the presence of these forces in the market also affects Platiwear’s attractiveness by helping the stakeholders to share any of their designs or products through different social media platforms with the main aim of social media marketing being to attract more customers to the organization’s products. Communication between the company and the customers and all the other stakeholders is also likely to improve as a measure towards sharing the good information about the company’s products.

Distinguish between incremental, radical and disruptive innovation

Incremental innovation is that type of innovation that is characterized by the innovators carrying out well articulated step by step improvements of the existing products and services (Cottam, Ensor, and Band, 2001). On the other hand, radical innovation looks at the long term benefits and effects of an innovation by either introducing or improving the current products in the market before introducing new products and services (Daellenbach, McCarthy, and Schoenecker, 1999). All the old products are phased off, the kind of relationship between the business management and the workers always deteriorates. Finally, disruptive innovation on the organization is characterized by having organizations expand to new markets, develop new volume networks, and disrupt the existing product market. The result of disruptive innovation is introduction of new products in the market.

Incremental innovation

Radical innovation

Disruptive innovation

Involves carrying out a series of improvement steps to an existing product or service

Focuses on improving efficiency and effectiveness

Leads to an improvement in competitive differentiation in the market

Improves product productivity in a significant way

Focuses on long-term impact

Entails displacing the current products and services in the market

Affects the kind of relationship between suppliers and consumers

Leads to the development of a totally new product category

This is about NEW technology

Creates new market

Creates new value network

Disrupts the existing market

Leads to a displacement of the existing markets

Brings entirely new products to the market

Based on the nature of the three innovations, GreenPlastics is experiencing a disruptive type of technology X that is characterized by the introduction of new and improved products in the market. Most of the products that are being applied by the organization are meant to help it get some of the best products in the fashion industry without having to worry on the existing product designs.

Role and characteristics of innovation champions

Innovation champions are made up of workers who have passion in playing an active role in making innovations succeed in their organization. The role of innovation champion is to pave way for other organizations for purposes of adopting new technologies in their operations (Daellenbach, McCarthy, and Schoenecker, 1999). They act as important organizational leaders who test the innovation grounds for the entire organization because they always act as early innovation adopters who get to have first-hand information and experience on all the new innovations in the organization. To play these roles well and perfectly, innovation champions have different characteristics that define them (Duane Ireland, Kuratko, and Morris, 2006). These defining characteristics include being well-networked within and outside the organization, and being positive influencers. Being an innovation champion is not about how senior an individual is, but his or her ability to influence others follow a certain path. Being a positive influencer in the organization does not need to be in a top position or be formerly employed in the organization (Klerkx, and Leeuwis, 2009). An individual is considered positive influencer if they have what it takes to convince others that following a certain path will be beneficial in their operations.

Additionally, innovation champions are also expected to be open-minded, be passionate on the innovation process, and have diverse knowledge in their areas of specialization. By being open-minded, innovation champions are expected to be highly explorative, inquisitive, and open to new ways of doing their normal chores (Mathisen, and Einarsen, 2004). The champions should also be passionate on what they are engaging in, with most of them having the ability to work towards successfully getting the innovation within their organizations and their sectors. Innovation champions are also supposed to have some diversified knowledge on their specific sector. The diversity knowledge will make them develop an adequate cross-functional mix in their respective areas. These characteristics help the champions to work perfectly towards achieving their innovation goal within KSG.

Who is the innovation champion in KSG?

Explain to her what instruments are available to measure the innovation climate and recommend a suitable instrument. Remember to explain what will be measured, the approach that needs to be taken and the benefits there-of.

An organizations innovation climate contributes significantly towards determining the success of its innovation strategies. Organizations that promote innovation within its operations have always had an upper hand when it comes to innovation because its employees are always motivated to implement their innovative ideas and vice versa. Despite having a successful innovation environment within an organization, there are different instruments that need to be adopted to determine the innovation climate within while at the same time recommending the right instrument for the organization (Mathisen, and Einarsen, 2004). Some of the instruments that can be adopted to assess the innovation climate in the organization include the financial abilities of the organization, the resources available in the organization to help the innovation process, and the ability of the organization to address any issues within the operations.

The ability of an organization to support new technologies always contributes significantly towards determining its success in making any innovations within an organization. Organizations that offer their employees with the right innovation resources always promote innovation in their operations while those who do not offer their employees with the needed resources always make their employees to shy away from making any meaningful innovations, thus restricting the whole innovation process to very limited number of innovators who can find their own resources (Klerkx, and Leeuwis, 2009). The ability of an organization to offer its employees with the right innovation finances to facilitate any of their innovations. The meaning of this is that, organizations that provide financial resources within their operations to facilitate for training and acquisition of all the resources required to make their innovation process flawlessly always leads to better innovations being made while those who do not have the financial muscle and capability to promote innovation within their operations always demotivate their employees in engaging in different innovation practices. As such, having the right financial resources always contribute towards making an organization work towards achieving their innovation goals and process.

The use of these instruments measure the organization’s ability to adopt and accommodate any innovation brought forth by their employees. The tools determine resource availability and the capacity of the organization to adopt any meaningful innovations in their operations. Importantly, these tools also make it easy for innovators to assess how the company has been able to adopt any of the earlier innovations and how its stakeholders picked up their different cases for purposes of ensuring that all the innovations were perfectly adopted and implemented in the organization without having any conflicts amongst those implementing them. For this case study therefore, looking at the organization’s ability to work promote innovation by offering the right resources will be the most effective tool to assess its innovation environment.

5.1 Distinguish between perceptual, process and environmental blockages. (3)

A perceptual block is a limitation that happens within a person’s mind. In most cases, a perceptual blockage is contributed forth by an individual who has a negative attitude towards developing a solution to some of the issues affecting their line of work. Individuals who focus more on their negative energy tend to experience this type of block in their daily operations because they never get the courage to execute any of their positive innovation plans. Process block on the other hand refers to the restrictions that individuals experience as they go on with their production operations. Process blocks are always experienced when the production line is faulty in any of its steps. Technological breakdown always contribute towards causing this block. The operations of an organization could also be blocked by the type of policies that are put forth by the organization to control and regulate all their operations. Any of the actions that limit an organization’s operations contributes significantly towards limiting their operations. Environmental blocks in an organization are on the other hand brought about by all the environmental factors that make it impossible for the organization to execute its operations without any limitations. Environmental restrictions are brought about by strict environmental policies that make it easy for organizations to either take a certain production line or avoid it completely because of the consequences that are linked to taking a certain harmful production line. All these blocks can affect an organization at once, especially when those in the management are not keen on adhering and complying with the existing policies that guide their production process.

Which of these organizational blockages are evident within KSG from the case study? Use examples to support your answer.

Based on the case study, KSG is suffering from both the perceptual and process blocks. The perceptual blocks are evident in the disagreements between the two main stakeholders in the organization while the process blocks happen because of the disagreements. The type of misunderstanding between the Research and Development Vice President and the organization’s Chief Executive Officer is a clear example of the perceptual block affecting the organization’s operations. These blocks can only be solved if the differences between the two key parties in the organization work on solving them amicably and within the right time. If not solved amicably within the right period, the organization is bound to collapse and have all its efforts go to waste.

It seems that despite KSG having a Research and Development (R&D) department, they lack an innovation strategy. Discuss why this is problematic with Shelley, using examples from the case study to highlight KSG’s approach. Advise her regarding the essential tasks involved in creating and implementing an innovation strategy for KSG

The success of any organization is definitely linked to the operations of its research and development department. The ability of this department to work towards providing an organization with the right solutions to their issues, something that contributes towards helping the organization develop some of the best strategies that work towards helping them achieve their goals within the right time and in the best way possible. A look at the case study indicates that KSG had one of the best research and development departments that helped it to come up with some technologically improved products tailored towards meeting the customer specifications that will make them satisfied with the products offered by the organization. However, despite having one of the best research and development departments, Shelley still finds the approach adopted by the organization being problematic.

Some of the main reasons why Shelley finds the approach of the organization problematic include having some relationship issues between the two main stakeholders in the organization who determine what is to be done and what is not to be done in the organization. By having the vice president of research and development not agreeing with the chief executive officer is a clear indication that the approach adopted in the organization is faulty and there is need for some further investigations to be done. Additionally, the organizations seem not well prepared to adopt some of the technologies that will change its operations in a different way. Those in the management do not have what it takes to absorb the effects of new technologies in their operations, something that affects how the organization meets some of its goals and even its negotiation skills.

As such, for the organization develop and adequately implement the right innovations, the management need to adopt and follow some important operational steps. As such, some of the most effective strategies that need to be followed by the organization include amongst others adopting an initial order from the management to set the right organization’s targets and setting some strategic moves to help the organization adopt its innovations adequately and effectively. Additionally, KSG through its management is also required to start with the search process, develop the right innovation design, and later present the innovation to all the stakeholders. If the organization abides to all these steps strictly, it will be very easy to meet its operational objectives and goals with ease and without any worries.

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5.1

Q5.2

Q6

Total

2

2

4

2

1

0

3

14

References

Bailetti, A.J. and Guild, P.D., 1991. Designers’ impressions of direct contact between product designers and champions of innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(2), pp.91-103.

Bates, R. and Khasawneh, S., 2005. Organizational learning culture, learning transfer climate and perceived innovation in Jordanian organizations. International journal of training and development, 9(2), pp.96-109.

Cottam, A., Ensor, J. and Band, C., 2001. A benchmark study of strategic commitment to innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(2), pp.88-94.

Daellenbach, U.S., McCarthy, A.M. and Schoenecker, T.S., 1999. Commitment to innovation: The impact of top management team characteristics. R&d Management, 29(3), pp.199-208.

Duane Ireland, R., Kuratko, D.F. and Morris, M.H., 2006. A health audit for corporate entrepreneurship: innovation at all levels: part I. Journal of business strategy, 27(1), pp.10-17.

Klerkx, L. and Leeuwis, C., 2009. Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological forecasting and social change, 76(6), pp.849-860.

Mathisen, G.E. and Einarsen, S., 2004. A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), pp.119-140.

Prasad, U.C. and Suri, R.K., 2011. Modeling of continuity and change forces in private higher technical education using total interpretive structural modeling (TISM). Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 12(3-4), pp.31-39.

Wong, S. and Pang, L., 2003. Motivators to creativity in the hotel industry—perspectives of managers and supervisors. Tourism management, 24(5), pp.551-559.

Yeh-Yun Lin, C. and Liu, F.C., 2012. A cross-level analysis of organizational creativity climate and perceived innovation: The mediating effect of work motivation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(1), pp.55-76.