Textbook (Zunker 2016),
Detailed instructions (with list of competencies/sub-competencies) Essay outline
Thank you so much.
Chapter 2. essay question Read Chapter 2 (The Constitution and it’s Origins):
Chapter 2. essay question
Read Chapter 2 (The Constitution and it’s Origins): https://openstax.org/books/american-government-3e/pages/2-introduction
Watch this Lecture Video about Limited Government:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gyz3sytT9JE
Instructions: Please submit your response that completely answers the essay question(s) below. Use information you learned in the assigned reading/videos to answer the questions. Do not use any outside sources, including those found via Google, etc. Questions asking for an opinion need to be answered with information learned in the lecture material.
Posts should be between 250-300 words.
Rubric:
(16-20 points) Post demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course material. Well written with few or no spelling or grammatical mistakes. Met or exceeded word count.
(10-15 points) Post demonstrates moderate knowledge and understanding of course material. More than a few spelling or grammatical mistakes. Did not meet word count.
(0-9 points) Post demonstrates a lack of knowledge and understanding of course material. Several spelling or grammatical mistakes. Did not meet word count.
The Question:
Explain why early Americans admired limited government and why the Founders specifically chose that kind of system for the Constitution. Should the country have stuck with the Articles of Confederation instead of the Constitution? Why or why not?
Child abuse and maltreatment is not limited to a particular age and
This assignment will use data from a career assessment given by myself (referred to in the first person or Psychology Assignment Help Child abuse and maltreatment is not limited to a particular age and can occur in the infant, toddler, preschool, and school-age years.
Choose two of the four age groups (infant, toddler, preschool, or school age) and discuss the types of abuse that are most often seen in this age.
Discuss warning signs and physical and emotional assessment findings the nurse may see that could indicate child abuse.
Discuss cultural variations of health practices that can be misidentified as child abuse.
Describe the reporting mechanism in your state and nurse responsibilities related to the reporting of suspected child abuse.
Explain your answer using at least two evidence-based resources.
You must post a substantive response to each of the required questions. A substantive response is constructive and adds value to the discussions. Substantive responses should be at least 200 words in length. Rarely should each require more than 250 words. Your responses need to reflect critical thought and demonstrate an understanding of the relevant concepts. All factual knowledge must be supported with appropriate citation of source.
Choice of Evaluation Methodology Competency to Stand Trial The first type of
Choice of Evaluation Methodology
Competency to Stand Trial
The first type of forensic evaluation determines whether a defendant is competent to stand trial. Criminal procedures may be halted when the law considers a defendant “capable of standing trial” (Beltrani, Zapf, & Brown, 2015). If a defendant’s mental disease prevents them from defending themselves in court, he or she may be deemed incompetent to stand trial. When a defendant is deemed incompetent, the following question is whether or not he or she will ever be able to face trial. This is known as the “restoration of competence.” The Supreme Court concluded in Jackson v. Indiana (1972) that a defendant’s detention may not exceed the period required to ascertain whether the defendant will soon be ready to make decisions. The state has two choices if it is found that the defendant will not be able to recover. They may either bring civil measures analogous to those brought against those who haven’t been charged with a crime, or they can let the person go without pressing criminal charges (Jackson vs. Indiana, 1972). This review is useful when the defendant does not grasp how the court operates and is unable to defend themselves.
Child Custody
Evaluations of child custody are the second sort of forensic evaluation. Custody evaluations are conducted to determine which parent and child would offer the greatest environment for the youngster. For this type of examination, the evaluator will likely wish to speak with the youngster and the child’s parents multiple times. The individual doing the evaluation may speak with the child’s significant others. The evaluator will also be interested in how each parent communicates with the youngster. The evaluator will compile all the data obtained throughout the evaluation phase into a report.
Parenting Fitness
In addition to the first two types of forensic evaluations, a review of a parent’s suitability to be a parent is possible. The assessment is similar to those performed in custody cases. Even though both include where a child should live, the parental fitness exam determines whether a parent should have parental rights. In this type of evaluation, the findings of a comprehensive inquiry of the mental processes of the parents are given significant weight. The Parent Awareness Skills Survey illustrates the type of examination (PASS) for parenting fitness evaluation. This survey examines parents’ perspectives on various circumstances that are likely to arise in their daily life. When determining a person’s suitability as a parent, assessing their knowledge of ideal parenting practices can be useful. The second examination type is the Parent Perception of Child Profile (PPCP). This exam effectively determines how well a parent understands their child, as it contains questions about the youngster. If a parent does not know much about their children, the evaluator may determine that the person is unfit to be a parent. The final exam to determine a parent’s physical fitness is administered to the child, not the parent. This exam reveals how an individual views his or her connections (PORT). This test indicates whether the child has learned to interact with their parent in a way that helps them feel at ease (Bird, 2020).
Mitigation of Penalty
The fourth forensic examination type involves determining whether a sentence should be shortened. If an individual can employ this type of examination, his or her sentence may be reduced. Most of the time, this evaluation is utilized to determine whether or not to execute the defendant. Infrequently does the defendant not match the insanity or incompetence pleas or defenses criteria. In certain instances, the defendant’s mental history and state of mind at the time of the offense could still be utilized to mitigate the severity of the sentence. In certain cases, the defendant may be able to utilize the legislation to decrease their sentence even if they are not found to be incompetent.
Recidivism
The fifth and final type of forensic examination determines the likelihood that an individual would commit a violent act in the future. There are three ways to determine the violent nature of anything. The first type of judgment makes no logic whatsoever. This is by far the most prevalent strategy. It depends greatly on how skilled and smart the examiner is and how well they have performed in the past. The second category is scheduled evaluations. The actuarial prediction is the most extreme form of violence evaluation. According to “Forensic Psychologist in Violence Risk Assessment, 2020,” this is the “formal application of set, established methodologies to determine the chance that violence would occur again.” (A forensic psychologist who evaluates the likelihood of violence). Several tests are conducted to investigate the violence. This ten-question actuarial exam is designed to determine the likelihood that an individual would commit a sexual or violent offense in the future (Melton et al., 2017). This 12-question test predicts the angry behavior of mentally ill offenders. According to most specialists, it is the actuarial tool with the best level of validity at present (Risk Assessment Approaches, 2015).
Chosen evaluation: Child Custody
Key Legal Questions
On behalf of my hypothetical client, Mr. Johnson, I’ll conduct a custody review. According to this study, the following are the most essential legal problems to consider:
Which parent should be legally and physically accountable for the child or children?
Should each parent have sole custody of the child, shared custody, or joint custody?
Methodology of Child Custody Evaluation
It takes multiple steps to determine who will have custody of a child. Interviewing is the initial step in the process. After these initial interviews, interviews with the parents and children will be conducted. Following the completion of all interviews, psychological evaluations are conducted. Each parent must pass a series of challenging examinations. The MMPI-2 is the most essential evaluation instrument to consider. All parents must complete these assessments. After completing the psychological evaluation, the evaluator will gather any further information necessary to produce a comprehensive report on child custody. The judge will review the report based on its contents (Melton et al., 2017).
Appropriateness of Methodology
This strategy is ideal because it allows you to provide comprehensive responses to the most essential legal issues, providing you with the fullest picture possible at this time. Also, it allows for a comprehensive examination to determine where the child should reside (Melton et al., 2017).
References
Beltrani, A. M., Zapf, P., & Brown, J. (2015). Competency to Stand Trial: What Forensic Psychologists Need to Know. Retrieved from https://online.csp.edu/blog/forensicscholars-today/competency-tostand-trial
Bird, B. (2020). Guidelines for Parental Fitness Evaluations. Retrieved from https://legalbeagle.com/6204831-guidelines-for-parental-fitness-evaluations.html
Forensic Parent Fitness Evaluation. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://atlantabehavioralconsultants.com/evaluations/forensic-parent-fitness-evaluation/
Forensic Psychologists in Violence Risk Assessment. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.forensicpsychologyedu.org/violence-risk-assessment
Gaskell, S. (2020). Mitigating Factors Psychological Evaluations: Chicago, IL & Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from https://psycholegalassessments.com/areas-of-expertise/mitigatingfactors/
Hamblin v. Mitchell. (2003). Retrieved from https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-6thcircuit/1423112.html
Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972). (2020). Retrieved from https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/406/715/
Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., Slobogin, C., Otto, R. K., Mossman, D., & Condie, L. O. (2017). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. New York: The Guilford Press. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.library.capella.edu
Morris, D. R., & DeYoung, N. J. (2012). Psychological abilities and restoration of competence to stand trial. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30, 710–728.
Risk Assessment Approaches (Forensic Psychology) – iResearchNet. (2015). Retrieved from http://criminal-justice.iresearchnet.com/forensic-psychology/risk-assessmentapproaches/
What You Need to Know About Child Custody Evaluations. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.ourfamilywizard.com/blog/child-custody-evaluation
Unit IV Assessment QUESTION 1 Define and describe the history of toxicology.
Unit IV Assessment
QUESTION 1
Define and describe the history of toxicology. In your answer, include what you think is the most important development and explain why you think that. Your response must be at least 200 words in length.
QUESTION 2
Discuss the adverse effects of toxic exposure. What do you think can be done to combat these effects? Your response must be at least 200 words in length.
QUESTION 3
Discuss the levels of toxic dosage and risk factors associated with this in human and environmental exposure. Your response must be at least 200 words in length.
QUESTION 4
Explain the difference between toxins and toxicants. In your opinion, which is most dangerous to the environment? Please provide examples in your rationale. Your response must be at least 200 words in length.
Discussion Board 1: Select one of the following communicable diseases below: 2019-nCoV
Discussion Board 1:
Select one of the following communicable diseases below:
2019-nCoV initial infection
Delta variant nCoV-19
Omicron Variant
Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
Ebola
Enterovirus
Influenza
Hantavirus
Hepatitis A
Hepatitis B
Hepatitis C
HIV/AIDS
Measles
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
Pertussis
Rabies
Sexually Transmitted Diseases/Infections (pick one specific type)
Shigellosis
Tuberculosis
West Nile Virus
Zika Virus
Post your discussion of the selected communicable disease to include the following information:
Give the mode of transmission, the incubation period, and the risk factors for the selected disease.
What age group is most likely to develop the disease? Why?
Describe the disease’s impact globally.
What is a primary prevention strategy for the disease? A secondary prevention strategy?
What is the treatment, if there is one, if not, what is the outcome?
Provide support for your responses with a scholarly article or reputable website.
Respond to one to two peers who selected a different communicable disease. Post thoughtful questions and/or contribute additional information on the disease and don’t forget your reference.
Suggested websites include:
http://www.cdc.gov/ (Centers for Disease control)
http://who.int/en/ (World Health Organization)
http://healthyamericans.org/ (Trust for America’s Health)
http://tn.gov/health/ (Tennessee Department of Health)
Discussion Board 2:
As nurses and community health advocates, we must address the needs of the vulnerable populations around us. Select one of the vulnerable populations below.
Homeless person
Refugees
American Indian
Incarcerated person
LGBT person
Person with mental illness
Person with substance abuse
Persons of color living in poverty.
Include the following information in your post concerning the vulnerable population you selected.
What specific health conditions disproportionately affect the selected population?
What could be barriers to accessing quality health care for the population?
What ethical and cultural issues would need to be addressed in caring for the population?
Support your posts with scholarly article(s) or reputable websites. The course textbook may also be a resource. Please be sure to cite your references.
Respond to one/two peer(s) who chose a different population from you. Post a thoughtful question or additional information for understanding the population and use an appropriate reference.
Discussion Board 3:
Choose one of the four articles listed below discussing ethics in public health situations.
Post an overview of your selected article giving the main points of the article.
Insights obtained from the article.
Do you agree or disagree with the article.
How would you apply the information to your current nursing practice.
Next, using the “Principles of the Ethical Practice of Public Health”, discuss the principle(s) that would be most applicable to the situation in the article and why. Link to the Principles: Public Health Ethical Principles
Be sure to provide all citations used in the Discussion Board.
Articles:
Ethics of Mandatory Flu Vaccine
Ethics and Childhood Vaccines
Ethical Issues in the Response to Ebola Virus Disease
ethics of covid vaccine
Ethics of mandating the Covid Vaccine /content/enforced2/8647846-82612.202180/WHO-2019-nCoV-Policy-brief-Mandatory-vaccination-2021.1-eng1.pdf
Respond to one peer who selected a different article and pose a question to stimulate discussion or give substantive feedback to reflect critical thinking. Do you agree or disagree with your peer and why? Use information in the course textbook and/or supplemental readings to support your responses.
Discussion Board 3:
Choose one of the four articles listed below discussing ethics in public health situations.
Post an overview of your selected article giving the main points of the article.
Insights obtained from the article.
Do you agree or disagree with the article.
How would you apply the information to your current nursing practice.
Next, using the “Principles of the Ethical Practice of Public Health”, discuss the principle(s) that would be most applicable to the situation in the article and why. Link to the Principles: Public Health Ethical Principles
Be sure to provide all citations used in the Discussion Board.
Articles:
Ethics of Mandatory Flu Vaccine
Ethics and Childhood Vaccines
Ethical Issues in the Response to Ebola Virus Disease
ethics of covid vaccine
Ethics of mandating the Covid Vaccine /content/enforced2/8647846-82612.202180/WHO-2019-nCoV-Policy-brief-Mandatory-vaccination-2021.1-eng1.pdf
Respond to one peer who selected a different article and pose a question to stimulate discussion or give substantive feedback to reflect critical thinking. Do you agree or disagree with your peer and why? Use information in the course textbook and/or supplemental readings to support your responses.
Discussion Board 4:
Current Events Discussion Board:
Choose one of the ‘current events’ below and after researching the subject:
– Give a brief overview of what you learned from the chosen Current Event.
– How will this event impact population/community health?
– What prevention strategies or education might be applicable to the issue?
– How could the event impact your area of nursing practice?
Zika virus and it’s affect on health: https://www.cdc.gov/zika/index.html
The cost of Covid-19 on the US: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2771764
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170504083157.htm
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/community-mitigation.html
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/scientific-brief-emerging-variants.html?CDC_AA_refVal=httpswww.cdc.govcoronavirus2019-ncovmorescience-and-researchscientific-brief-emerging-variants.html
The Role of Public Health in the Prevention of War: Rationale and Competencies.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6748293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062030/
Respond to one peer who selected a different current event and pose a question to stimulate discussion or give substantive feedback to reflect critical thinking. Do you agree or disagree with your peers and why? Use information in the course textbook and/or supplemental readings to support your responses.
Guidelines for Initial Posts
The initial post must be supported by a minimum of one (1) Scholarly reference related to the discussion topic (this should be an article not included in the course content), in addition to referencing the assigned reading/course materials found in the course content (i.e. supplemental articles, text, etc.).
This scholarly reference should be from a current (less than 5 years old), peer-reviewed journal from the Sherrod Library online database, unless the article chosen is a classic piece of evidence-based writing. American Journal of Public Health, Public Health Nursing, Social Science and Medicine, JAMA, Nursing Research, Research in Nursing & Health, New England Journal of Medicine, Western Journal of Nursing Research, and Applied Nursing Research are some suggested sources. Entry-level nursing journals such as AJN, RN, and Nursing are not acceptable.
Use Internet sources very selectively, making sure that they are appropriately professional and in-depth. If you are unsure of the appropriateness of the website, use this link for additional information: https://usm.maine.edu/library/checklist- evaluating-web-resources.
Information from the article must be cited using appropriate in-text citations in the body of the post. The following website is very helpful in formatting references and in-text citations: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
The article’s full citation should be presented at the end of the post using correct APA format.