Get help from the best in academic writing.

The Tragedy of Teenage Abortion

The Tragedy of Teenage Abortion In society today, teens are taught by the television and the media that pre-marital sex is not a bad thing. This problem is leading to many teenage pregnancies, that then lead to abortion. All over the world teens are faced with many challenges in their everyday lives. Sex is being portrayed as extremely appealing in the media, but what they don’t show is the pregnancies and the unborn child that never asked to be created in the first place that is being discarded. Abortion is in no way acceptable, it is murder of an unborn child. Many doctors will say that abortion is not a bad thing, and it’s not murder. They have argued that it is just an embryo, and is not yet a child. In the book The Terrible Choice: The Abortion Dilemma, Glanville Williams, a well-known English criminologist, was quoted saying abortion should be treated like a tonsillectomy. It’s a minor operation to remove unwanted or harmful “tissue growth”. Both tissues are alive, and contain material substances, chemical compounds, DNA and RNA molecules. They may vary a little, but they are mainly matter which is composed of cells which are composed of chemicals (1-2). The only difference between a tonsillectomy and an abortion is that the fetus can grow and develop into a human being much like ourselves. Joseph Farah wrote an article about abortion in The Human Life Review. In this, she quoted Steven Pinker, a professor of psychology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology saying, ” Babies aren’t really people, because they don’t have an ability to reflect upon (themselves) as a continuous locus of consciousness, to form and savor plans for the future, to dread death and to express the choice not to die. And there’s the rub: Our immature neonates don’t posess these traits any more than mice do. Several moral philosophers have concluded that neonates are not persons, and thus neo-naticide should not be classified as murder” (no page). Farah’s article also looks at Michael Tooley’s, a philosophy professor at the University of Colorado, views. He thinks “there should be some period of time, such as a week after birth, as the interval during which infanticide will be permitted” (no page). More in this same school said that parents should be able to kill their children “up to the time the baby learns to use certain expressions” (no page).

The Endless Torture of Animal Experimentation

The Endless Torture of Animal Experimentation

Is using animals in medical research necessary? Some people would say yes, others would say no… but who’s right? No matter what one thinks or believes this question still remains, yet to be answered. At first this question seems like its answer lies within ones opinion and only that, but if you look closer there is a lot more to it than opinion. Feeling sorry for the animals is definitely where it starts for people who don’t agree with animal testing; but that’s not where it ends.

Scientists and medical researchers say that animal testing is the future to finding cures. They also believe it is cruel to use animals to test our products on but there are no other options. Using animals for testing helps them figure out what will work and not work on humans. Using animals can help find cures faster and help prevent more human deaths.

Although some people believe that’s true, I have a different opinion. While reading articles from different doctors, I discovered that using animals in the medical area hasn’t helped humans near what people think it has. Just because animals are living breathing creatures like us, doesn’t mean their systems are anything like ours. In fact, they’re not anything like ours. There has been testing after testing done on animals to help find cures and medicine that will work on humans. After all that… what do we have to show for it? A puzzle with missing pieces that we are not going to find… not this way.

Ray Creek, a board -certified doctor, explains why the use of animals actually slows down medical research. “The simplest explanation is that animal experiments provide misleading data. At best, they tell us a good deal about how animals experience disease, but they rarely tell us something of value that can be applied to humans. Animal tests provide additional data, but not a higher level of accuracy.” This very subject is something that I have always thought of, but never thought I was right. What good is it going to do us to use animals to test medicines on if it’s not even helping?

Another statement Ray Creek said was that “The General Accounting Office several years ago concluded that animal tests do not accurately predict how dangerous a drug will be in humans. In other words, drug tests on animals do not protect humans from harmful medications.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.