In our modern day world, the technology of genetic engineering and human cloning for the use of asexual reproduction has reached a point to where we must ask ourselves if it is a good practice for medical purposes, or if it presents issues of ethical and moral concern. Human cloning is a very cmplex process; it is very multilayered in the promises and threats that are suggested by scientists (Kolata 8). In the basic definition, cloning is accomplished by removing the nucleus of a mature, unfertilized egg and replacing it with a specialized cell from an adult organism. The nucleus taken contains most of the hereditary material from the original human source, and it develops from the human source it was taken from. This process makes it possible for scientists, or geneticists, to reproduce unlimited amounts of duplicates, which are known as clones (Pence: Flesh 18). Human cloning has reached a point wher the ethical and moral values have not been considered, and we have not fully learned and understood the negative consequences of such a new and overwhelming technology. There are, however, individual benefits of using genetic engineering for medical purposes. Such purposes include gene therapy and asexual reproduction. The use of genetic engineering in our society is viewed differently in two very arguable ways. Scientists, bioethicists, doctors, lawyers, professors, and authors join in the debate over human cloning and its medical benefits versus moral and ethnical concern.
Cloning and genetic engineering ahve been ideas that scientists have explored for a long time. “Cloning first came to public attention roughly thirty years ago, following the s…
… middle of paper …
…raise tough questions. http://www.msnbc.com/news/229707.asp
Mohler, Albert R. “The Brave New World of Cloning: A Christian Worldview Perspective.” Human Cloning: Religious Responses. Ed. Ronald Cole-Turner. Louiseville, Ky.: Westminster John Know Press, c 1997.
MSNBC Staff and Wire Reports. Korea says human clone test succeeds: Scientists claim to cultivate human embryo in experiment. http://www.msnbc.com/news/224234.asp
Pence, Gregory E. Flesh of my Flesh: The Ethics of Cloning Humans. Lanham, Md. Rowman and Littlefield, c 1998.
Pence, Gregory E. Who’s Afraid of Human Cloning? Lanham, Md. Rowman and Littlefield, c 1998.
Roleff, Tamara L. ed. Biomedical Ethics: Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego, CA Greenhaven Press, Inc. c 1998.
Wekesser, Carol. ed. Genetic Engineering: Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego, CA Greenhaven Press, Inc. c 1996.
Cloning – The Great Human Embryo Clone Hype
The Great Human Embryo Clone Hype
Abstract: The cloning of human embryos has sparked a major debate worldwide. New cloning methods have surpassed the technology that could only duplicate specified genes or produce offspring from frozen mice and human embryos. Cloning has been used to free would-be sufferers from a particular disease carrying gene. Likewise, out of desire to assist infertile couples and overcome the drawbacks of using in-vitro fertilization, came the newest method of cloning. Although skepticism exists because of the lack of regulation and the extreme possibilities considered such as cloning for hair and eye color or for a particular gender, with proper regulation, researchers and doctors intend to embrace this modern and unpredictable technology as our newest weapon in combating health related problems.
There is a lot of commotion going in Washington, D.C. It has nothing to do with White Water or the White House, but everything to do with politics and people. There is constant clamour surrounding the issue of cloning technique application for various purposes including the elimination of defective genes which cause disease and an alternative mean of human embryo reproduction. In modern science, three types of cloning exists, positional cloning (genes), Jurassic Park cloning (nucleus), and blastomere separation (human embryos). According to Conley, “The recent experiment in human cloning in Washington, D.C. has provoked moral unease in the public. Both specialists and lay persons sense that this new technology is fraught with ethical and political peril,” (2). Well, in such protests there is a hint of hypocrisy. Society has already embraced in-vitro fertilization, which is a form of human gen…
… middle of paper …
1. Collins, Francis S. and Fink, Leslie. “The Human Genome Project” . Alcohol Health