The two common threads that connect Charlotte Perkins Gilman and the narrator in her story are depression/postpartum depression, and entrapment within their roles as of women. Specifically, Gilman and the narrator are trying to escape the function society has placed on them. First, after fulfilling their expected duties as wife and mother, both Gilman and the narrator become depressed after the birth of their child. It is this depression that leads them to the infamous rest cure…
… middle of paper …
…ness in the form of all “of those creeping women” trying to escape from the oldness that trapped them, acted as a premonition for changes in women’s rights movement (Gilman 89). For Gilman and her story “The Yellow Wallpaper” life is imitating art.
Works Cited
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. “The Yellow Wallpaper.” Images of Woman in American Popular Culture. Ed. Angela G. Dorenkamp, et al. Port Worth: Harcourt Brace, 1995. 78-89.
Kessler, Carol Parley. “Charlotte Perkins Gilman 1860 -1935.” Modem American Women Writers. Ed. Elaine Showalter, et al. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1991. 155 -169.
Scharnhorst, Gary. “Gilman.” Reference Guide to Short Fiction. Ed. Noelle Watson. Detroit: St. James Press, 1994. 209-210.
Wagner-Martin, Linda. “The Yellow Wallpaper.” Reference Guide to Short Fiction. Ed. Noelle Watson. Detroit: St. James Press, 1994. 981- 982.
A Close Reading of Euripides’ Medea
A Close Reading of Medea
Medea’s first public statement, a sort of “protest speech,” is one of the best parts of the play and demonstrates a complex, at times even contradictory, representation of gender. Medea’s calm and reasoning tone, especially after her following out bursts of despair and hatred, provides the first display of her ability to gather herself together in the middle of crisis and pursue her hidden agenda with a great determination. This split in her personality is to a certain degree gender bias. The lack of emotional restraint is “typical” of women, and the strong attention to moral action is a common trait of heroes. Medea actually uses both of these traits so that her wild emotions fuel her ideals, thus producing a character that fails to fit into a clear mold.
The speech itself highlights women’s subordinate status in ancient Greek society, especially in the public eye.” When Medea points out that women, especially “foreign” women, “require some knowledge of magic and other covert arts to exert influence over their husbands in the bedroom,” she argues for a kind of alternative power that women can enjoy. A power that remains invisible to men and unknown by society, yet sways each with unquestionable force. Medea also supplies a method for interpreting her own character towards the end of her speech (lines 251-257): we should read her history of exile as a metaphoric exaggeration of all women’s alienation; in fact, her whole predicament, past and yet to come, can be read as an allegory of women’s suffering and the heights of tragedy it may unleash if left unattended. Under this model of interpretation, Medea portrays the rebellion of women against their “wretchedness.” Such a transparent social allegory may seem forced or clichéd in our own contemporary setting, but in Euripides’ time it would have been revolutionary, as tragedy generally spoke to the sufferings of a generic (perhaps idealized) individual, rather than a group. It would be a mistake, however, to claim that Medea’s speech elaborates a clearly progressive political message, as her concluding remarks appeal to women’s natural talent for devious manipulation (line 414). While Euripides’ play manifests many revolutionary political sentiments, its social criticisms remain sporadic, forming just a part of some of the many trains of thought he follows.
Aside from providing a time frame that initiates a sense of urgency to the play (Medea only has a day to complete her plans), the exchange between Creon and Medea introduces the theme of her cleverness.