In an article by Richard Eskow, “Sanders vs. Clinton: Who Has the Best Plan for America’s College students?” for the most part is committed to compare the variations of the two plans. Eskow starts off by mentioning some facts about society. He then goes into the general purposes of both plans for college finances. Eskow discusses Clinton’s plan and also mentions the ideas of what other Republican candidates plans to do. Lastly, he explains Sanders’ plan and also reflects on the nation. Eskow is comparing the two different plans to explain and show us the differences these two candidates are from one another. In doing so, Eskow has successfully applied all three types of rhetorical appeals, logos, pathos, and ethos, to effectively urge eligible…show more content…
He starts off my saying that Clinton’s plan is confusing and has many unanswered questions. He says that Social Security doesn’t have to go through a “means test” (Eskow), so why should public education have to go through a test. He uses a really good example for logos because logically it makes sense that we shouldn’t have to make students use their family’s income to depend on if they will get any benefits, instead if they are qualified they should get benefits. He also says that the problem with this plan that there can be a possibility where the middle class income can easily be shifted. This is another good example of logos because it would make sense of the possibility of shift in income and how it will effect those who benefit and those who don’t. He mentions that Chris Christie, republican candidate, wants to “cut Social Security benefits to Americans” (Eskow) who earn over a certain amount of money. This is a great example of ethos because he uses strong evidence and research. Eskow continues by stating that programs like “Social Security, Medicare,” (Eskow) and other programs are offered to those who qualify. In this section he expresses ethos because he shows his knowledge on programs that is offered to help those in need of help. In this section Eskow has successfully used both ethos and logos to show his…show more content…
He says that in the plan offered by Clinton also will require middle class students who qualify for the program to work at least “10 hours a week” (Eskow), in addition to their studies. He continues with saying that Clinton has weird judgment of work; especially since most of society “believes that higher education and hard work are the doors to opportunity.” (Eskow) These two are great examples of logos and pathos. It has an emotional and logical impact because society understands that it’s already hard to go to school, get good grades, and be successful at it, so by adding work it makes sense that it can take on an emotional and physical toll on one’s body. Also logically Eskow shows that he is questioning Clinton by saying in a sense does that mean that Clinton think that studying and getting those good grades aren’t enough work to be eligible for benefits. He then moves on by stating that Clinton has a “no debt” (Eskow) program. He says that this program is a plan to “eliminate student debt” (Eskow) and that it would be nearly impossible for Clinton to reach that goal because it’s already hard for middle class families to make ends meet and some are already forced to take on debt. This is an example of logos because it’s logic that by barely making ends meet how can there be no debt when its basically living from pay check to pay check. Eskow has successfully showed both
Comparing F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway history assignment help in canada: history assignment help in canada
F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway, though both evolved from the same literary time and place, created their works in two very dissimilar writing styles which are representative of their subject matter. The two writers were both products of the post-WWI lost generation and first gained notoriety as members of the American expatriate literary community living in Paris during the 1920’s. Despite this underlying fact which influenced much of their material, the works examined in class dramatically differ in style as well as subject matter. As far as style, Fitzgerald definitely takes the award for eloquence with his flowery descriptive language whereas Hemingway’s genius…show more content…
Another distinction between the two styles is that Fitzgerald narrated much of what the characters think and feel whereas Hemingway, for the most part with the exception of “Soldier’s Home,” let action and dialogue reveal the story’s message. “Winter Dreams” offers a complete narrative of the central characters’ thoughts from the beginning when Dexter’s winter fantasies are related to the reader to the end when his image of Judy is shattered and lost youthful passion for life is realized. “Even the grief he could have borne was left behind in the country of illusion, of youth, of the richness of life, where his winter dreams had flourished” (1519). The exact same is true about “Babylon Revisited” as in the final paragraph provides a clear view into Charlie’s mind. “He would come back some day; they couldn’t make him pay forever. But he wanted his child, and nothing was much good now, beside that fact. He wasn’t young any more, with a lot of nice thoughts and dreams to have by himself. He was absolutely sure Helen wouldn’t have wanted him to be so alone” (Norton Anthology 1511). Now to look at Hemingway, “The End of Something” reveals the characters through dialogue and it is via this medium that the reader learns most
Comparing Hills Like White Elephans apus history essay help
Comparing Hills Like White Elephans by Ernest Hemingway and Babylon Revisited by F. Scott Fitzgerald At first glance it seems that the two short stories “Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest Hemingway and “Babylon Revisited” by F. Scott Fitzgerald have absolutely nothing in common other than being written by two famous American authors in the 1920s. Although there is much contrast between the two works, when examined more closely, similarities seem to be extremely easy to pick out. Similarities are evident in the existence of superficiality…show more content…
It is a relationship between an American man and a woman called Jig that is devoid of responsibility. This relationship is very similar to the past marriage of Charlie Wales, the protagonist in “Babylon Revisited.” Charlie used to be married to a woman named Helen during the stock market boom of the 1920s before she tragically died of a heart condition. Charlie and Helen were a very rich couple due to Charlie’s skilful playing of the stock market. The two led a lifestyle of dissipation mostly characterized by binge drinking. They were rich Americans in Europe who would live their entire lives in excess by dining at the most expensive restaurants in Paris nightly and drinking their lives away. The couple in “Hills Like White Elephants” was also a couple in Europe who would literally spend all their time drinking different kinds of alcohol and discussing the scenery that surrounded them. There was nothing real to their relationship. Both couples engaged in ostensibly pointless relationships that existed just out of convenience. A very clear similarity between the two stories was that both the American man and Charlie Wales had been happy before the time of the story and this happiness had been brought to an abrupt halt by sudden events. The sudden event that brought an end to the American man’s happiness was the fact that he and Jig had become pregnant. This unexpected pregnancy seemed to cause a problem in their relationship because the American man
The Evolution of the American Dream gcse history essay help: gcse history essay help
Comparing the perspective of the American dream in the 1920’s to the American Dream in the 1940’s and present day seems to be a repeating cycle. The American dream is always evolving and changing. The American dream for present day is similar to the dream of the 1920’s. An Ideal of the American life is to conform to what our society has determined is success. Money, materialism and status had replaced the teachings of our founding fathers in the 1920’s. A return to family values and hard work found its way back into American’s lives in the 1940’s. The same pursuit of that indulgent lifestyle that was popular in the roaring twenty’s has returned today for most Americans, many Americans are living on credit and thinking…show more content…
Daisy was from a wealthy family and she believed that wealthy girls did not marry poor boys. Gatsby believes that his ostentatious life style would impress and win Daisy away from her husband Tom Buchanan. Tom’s family had been wealthy for years, they would be considered “old Money” Gatsby’s ideas were a common theme in the 1920’s. The accumulation of alot money was the answer to everyone’s problems. Lavish lifestyles and living on borrowed money was part of the American dream. Americans had lost sight of what their ancestors considered important when they decided to believe the lies that money would make them important, happy and solve all of their problems. Family values and hard work had been replaced by indulgence and gluttony in the area of money. Many people in the 1920’s threw away any moral values that they had learned and from their parents. They wanted to live like there were no consequences for their actions. Chasing a dream of wealth and superficiality. Unlike people in the 1920’s, families in the 1940’s returned to a hard working, frugal way of life. Not only did The Great Depression change American ideas, the beginning of World War II changed ideas of the American dream. They had seen what living on verge of a complete financial meltdown after the crash of the stock market in October 13, 1928. Americans saw what living on credit, and only living for materialism and money could leave
Get Access
The Awakening Of The American Dream history assignment help australia
The awakening of the American dream: The reality concealed by paradise
The American dream is an ideology that has been around, known, and praised for a long time. It is an aspiration many long to achieve and protect with their lives. A story that has been written out for us and embed in our minds. As children, we begin school and are taught the pledge of allegiance and how important it is for everyone to take a moment to praise and thank what the nation for what it has to offer. We rise and hold this belief to our hearts looking upon the flag representing our nation. We grow up believing that we are the privileged ones who have the opportunity of liberty and justice for all. Glorifying what it means to be an American, convincing us that we can all have an opportunity to even be President thus creating a fixed mindset of paradise. Therefore, serving the American dream as an expectation rather than as stimuli; created only for a narrow group of people exposing the realization that only a few have the privilege to acquire the dream. America is a “new nation” an experiment founded on change and beliefs (Beach 148). A nation, our founders believed could be different and gift people with individuality, hopes, and enlighten them with the American dream. A dream brought from desperate times, providing motivation for many even until this day.
People have maintained the hope that the American dream can be achieved by anybody. We have had different races immigrate into the united