In each of your body paragraphs, paragraphs two, three, and four state one of your reasons explain it thoroughly and relate it to your position. Then directly cite a relevant source (evidence) to support the reason. In the next sentence(s), show how your quotation supports your reason. Thereafter, anticipate an objection to your stated reason and evidence. Now refute (Refutation) the objection. This means that you must have three sound reasons with a direct citation to support each reason.
Paragraph five, Conclusion. As for your conclusion, it is not enough to just summarize a conclusion. Among other things, your conclusion must call your audience/readers to action. In the case of particularly an argument of the sort you are pursuing in your essay, you need to tell the readers specifically what they must do to be sure. In other words, tell the readers which appropriate actions they must take to achieve the goal you want.
Sources must be from the following websites,
*INSTRUCTIONS Topic: How KM will stem the tide of losing talent and
Topic: How KM will stem the tide of losing talent and improve communication among departments?
Note: This week’s reading about The KM Team(Chapter 12 – Knowledge Management Book) is very straightforward and should help you identify specific human resources requirements that might be needed to implement the recommended actions you will detail in your posting next week.
You will want to think about whether there is a need for a new leadership role to be created, where that leadership position might sit in the organization, whether there is a need for a substantial team of KM staff to implement your recommendations or whether KM responsibilities will be embedded in existing jobs. Keep an eye on the costs implications of your staffing ideas.
Complete the following:
Create a PPT presentation to include the transcript, using the template below, discussing the major points for this week:
Address the issue of losing personnel from the scenario example and how KM can help stem the tide of good people leaving the company.
Address the issue of production or company performance glitches mentioned in the case scenario. The presentation should include all of the issues presented to date to include Dawn/SECI model; Helmut; Harry and Imogine and missing files; Amid; Asian branch; cultural considerations and more. Please read the attached GDD employee scenarios.
Make at least three recommendations as to how GDD might effectuate KM practices to solve all the problems suggested in the case scenario.
Explain why these recommendations would work. Be sure to consider the multidisciplinary nature of KM and how these recommendations might reach across the company to touch all departments and divisions.
In the answer consider the company profile and case study facts to support the recommendations as well as the class material.
You must use course material to support your responses and APA in-text citations with a reference list.
PPT Transcript Template Example:
Create the PPT bullet points you would need to cover your answers in the slides.
Explain the ideas that support your bullets in the transcript in the notes section for each slide.
Bullet: Knowledge Managers would collect information from all departments in GDD and share it with others for better strategic decision making.
Explanation: Look at the example given in the case study and support it with material from our readings and prior discussions to show the value to GDD.
Dalkir, K. (2011). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice (2nd Ed). The MIT Press.
Jacobson, M. (2022, July 13). 14 key factors of successful knowledge management implementation. Bloomfire. Retrieved from https://bloomfire.com/blog/factors-of-successful-knowledge-management-implementation/
Introducing Organizational Learning
Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice
16 Reasons Why People Don’t Share Their Knowledge – and what to do about it
How to motivate knowledge sharing using gamification, goals, recognition, and rewards
Managing Knowledge Reuse
Editorial: Role of knowledge and learning systems in fostering work-life balance
IST 612 – Business Analysis Spring 2021 Cleveland State University Abdullah Oguz,
society or are individuals responsible for the high mortality rate? Individuals Writing Assignment Help IST 612 – Business Analysis
Cleveland State University
Abdullah Oguz, Ph.D
IST 612 – Business Analysis
Cleveland State University
Abdullah Oguz, Ph.D
ASSIGNMENT – 1
This assignment must be typed in a Microsoft Word document with 12 pt. Times New Roman font. The text must be double-spaced on standard-sized paper (8.5″ by 11″) with 1″ margins on all sides, and a minimum of 3 (three) full pages in length including the references, if available.
If you have references, you should document your references including the in-text citations using the guidelines provided in the following publication:
American Psychological Association (2009). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Sixth edition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
You can use the following website to review a good example for using references in this format:
You will read the case study below, and answer all the questions.
You are a business analyst in an initiative that is in the process of defining, building, and implementing a new car booking system for a car rental company. You have been working on this initiative for the last 3 months and have documented approximately 100 different requirements from all stakeholders and other resources. Some of the stakeholders are listed as follows:
IS Steering Committee (Car rental company managers)
Maintenance / Repair Department
Branches all across the USA (Managers and employees)
Organizational Customers (Corporates which rent vehicles regularly based on a contract)
Government agencies (e.g., Department of Transportation, US Environmental Protection Agency)
Not-for-profit organizations (e.g., associations that were established to reduce the carbon emissions)
You are expecting to have a business case in the end of 6 months. You will submit the business case with alternative solutions to IS Steering Committee in the car rental company.
You chose an adaptive approach for a rapid delivery of business value in short iterations. Therefore, you are thinking of starting these iterations in 2 weeks, and having iterations every one month. You are expecting to have three iterations. You are planning to get feedback from the end users and customers during each iteration. In the end of each iteration, you will meet with IS steering committee members and some end users.
Please create a brief business analysis approach that will detail how you will conduct each iteration. (Refer to 3.1.4 “Elements” in BABOK Guide).
Solution definition (How will you create solutions in each iteration? Will you use
prototypes? Are there techniques that will help you with creating solutions in
Level of formality (How will you ensure high level interaction in your team? How will you get feedback from stakeholders?)
Activities (Which activities will you have in each iteration? You will divide the work into iterations, identify the deliverables for each iteration, and then identify the associated activities and tasks. You don’t need to write in detail. For example, in each iteration, you will prepare for and conduct elicitation, and confirm elicitation results. Then, you can have requirements analysis and design definition. Finally, you can conduct solution evaluation.)
Timing (Duration of each iteration has been already specified in the case study.)
You also decided to conduct a document analysis. In the Preparation stage (10.18.3), include all possible documents that you can examine.
You should list the sources (documents) which are relevant to the objective of
your initiative. You need to consider if these documents are up-to-date, genuine,
and credible. You also need to consider if stakeholder can understand the content of this document easily. Some examples of documents are provided below:
A written work procedure or work flow
Reports from prior organizational studies
Organizational mission statements
Business plans (Strategic business and IS plans)
Business policy manuals
Internal and external correspondence ix. Invoices
Choose five stakeholders, and place them on the Stakeholder Matrix (Figure 10.43.1). The vertical axis will be “Influence of Stakeholder” (Power of stakeholders) and the horizontal axis will be “Impact on Stakeholder” (Interest of stakeholders). Explain why you placed them in their quadrants.
Based on 3.3.4 “Elements”, create a Governance Approach. Your stakeholder matrix and the stakeholder list will be an important input for this output. Besides, use 10.35 “Process Modelling” to create a graphical model to show how change requests will be processed. Consider having another team member in your team to manage change requests. You should answer all these questions:
How will business analysis work will be approached and prioritized?
What is the process for proposing a change to business analysis information?
Who has the authority and responsibility to propose changes?
Who should be involved in the change discussions?
Who has responsibility for analyzing change requests?
Who has the authority to approve changes?
How will you document and communicate changes?
Question 1: 15 points
Question 2: 10 points
Question 3: 20 points
Question 4: 30 points
Touchstone 3: Informative Essay Revision ASSIGNMENT: Review the in-text comments and summary
Touchstone 3: Informative Essay Revision
ASSIGNMENT: Review the in-text comments and summary feedback you received on your Touchstone 2.2 draft to deepen and extend your analysis of your topic. Submit a revision of your Touchstone 2.2 draft that reflects the feedback. Include a copy of your Touchstone 2.2 draft below the “Think About Your Writing” questions for this unit.
Sample Revised Image Analysis Essay
Sample Revised Extended Definition Essay In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.
All writers revise their work as part of the writing process. For Touchstone 3, submit a revised version of your Touchstone 2.2 essay. The process of revising involves “re-thinking” your essay. Your revision should reflect your attention to the following:
As you consider possible revisions, evaluate how your essay can be improved in each of the areas above. Focus your attention on the areas that would benefit most from revision. You can add, delete, or move text as you revise your essay.
Note the following revision guidelines:
Do not draft a new essay. You must revise your Touchstone 2.2 draft.
Allow time between drafts so that you can see your original work from a new perspective.
Revision is different from editing and proofreading; however, be sure to edit and proofread your revised essay before you submit it.
Revise your Touchstone 2.2 essay using the revision strategies you learned in Unit 3. This revision should reflect significant changes from your first draft, and should incorporate the feedback you received on Touchstone 2.2.
B. Think About Your Writing
Include answers to all of the following reflection questions below your completed revision.
1. How much time did you spend revising your draft? Which revision strategies did you use, and which of them worked best for you? (2-3 sentences) Sophia says: A good revision takes time. This is your opportunity to re-think, re-arrange, and re-evaluate your writing. Which revision strategies did you use? Do you still agree with your thesis? Do you believe that your evidence supports your thesis, and that you have met the requirements of the assignment?
2. How did the revision process improve your essay? (2-3 sentences) Sophia says: Compare your draft to your revision. Have you added relevant details or removed irrelevant ones? Have you changed the order of details or paragraphs? Have you added transitions for better flow? In which ways is your revision better than your draft?
3. What did you learn about your writing process or yourself as a writer? (2-3 sentences) Sophia says: Think about the entire process of drafting and revising this essay. Did any part of the process surprise you or reveal something unexpected?
C. Revision Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until your essay meets all of the guidelines.
Editing and Revising
❒ Have you significantly revised your essay, making adjustments in areas that include organization, focus, and clarity?
❒ Have you made comprehensive changes in word choice, sentence variety, and style?
❒ Have you made revisions that are based on the feedback provided by your evaluator?
Essay Prompt: Image Analysis
❒ If you chose the image analysis prompt, have you revisited your analysis and interpretation of the image to ensure that you’ve done more than describe it?
❒ Have you revisited your conclusions about the audience and effectiveness of the ad?
❒ Did you include the image in your essay?
❒ Is your draft 800-1300 words long?
Essay Prompt: Extended Definition
❒ If you chose the extended definition prompt, did you make sure that your definition is unique, and doesn’t rely too heavily on the traditional definition?
❒ Did you revisit the examples and explanations that support your definition?
❒ Is your essay 800-1300 words in length?
❒ Have you revised your thesis statement?
❒ Did you make sure that your thesis states the overall claim of the essay?
❒ Is your thesis one sentence that is located in the introductory paragraph?
Focus and Organization
❒ Have you reviewed your body paragraphs and made sure that each one has a clear topic sentence?
❒ Have you revisited your conclusion paragraph and concluding statement?
❒ Have you reviewed the sequence of your ideas?
❒ Have you improved your transitions to connect ideas between sentences and paragraphs?
❒ Have you improved the flow of your essay?
❒ Does your revision have a clear focus?
❒ Have you maintained a clear focus and included only relevant details?
Style and Tone
❒ Have you ensured that the tone of your essay is unbiased and informative?
❒ Have you informed the reader about your topic?
❒ Have you reconsidered your word choices?
❒ Have you checked your draft for grammatical errors?
❒ Have you used Spell-Check or another method to check spelling?
❒ Have you punctuated your essay correctly?
Before You Submit
❒ Have you included your name, date, and course at the top left of the page?
❒ Have you completed the “Think About Your Writing” questions?
❒ Is your essay between three and five pages (approximately 800-1300 words) in length?
Your essay and reflection will be scored according to the Informative Rubric, which considers your revision and edits, effectiveness in addressing the writing prompt for either the analysis essay OR the definition essay, the working thesis, organization, style and tone, focus, conventions and proofreading, and your responses to the “Think About Your Writing” questions.
Your essay should be three to five pages (approximately 800-1300 words) in length.
Informative Guidelines and Topic Selection Guidelines must be followed or your submission will not be graded.
Double-space the draft, and use one-inch margins.
Use an easy-to-read 12-point font.
All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
Your draft and revision must be original and written for this assignment.
Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
Your submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your draft.
Your submission must include, in the following order: your revised essay, your answers to the “Think About Your Writing” questions, and a copy of your original essay (from Touchstone 2.2).
Submit only a single file only that contains all assignment components.
Acceptable file formats are .doc and .docx.