Get help from the best in academic writing.

Shakespeare’s Othello – There Would be No Othello Without Iago

There would be No Othello without Iago

Though the name of the play written by William Shakespeare is called “Othello,” the character Othello is not the main character, but rather Iago is. Iago is the character who drives the play, he is the one who makes things happen. Without his greed and hated, there would be no play at all. The whole play is centered around Iago’s revenge and in doing so, he is willing to make other people’s lives miserable. Through “Othello,” Iago uses the other characters to avenge the wrong doings which Othello has inflicted upon him, and will go to any means to do so.

The play starts out with Iago not attaining the position he wanted from Othello, but rather the position was given to Cassio, who in Iago’s mind is unqualified for the job. This is where Iago starts to spin his web of destruction. Iago hates Othello with a passion, and in his heart he truly believes that Othello has slept with his wife Emilia. “I hate the Moor, and it is abroad that ‘twixt my sheets ‘has done my office” Othello. Act I. iii. 429-431. Being placed aside for the lieutenant position made him even more mad. He then decided on a plan and took full action upon it “to abuse Othello’s ear that he (Cassio) is too familiar with his (Othello’s) wife” Othello. Act I. iii. 438-439.

Roderigo was Iago’s puppet. He believed everything that Iago told him and always did as he said, which in the end got him killed. Through the play one wonders often why Roderigo keeps following Iago’s demands, and it was because he truly loved Desdemona. He was willing to kill himself if he couldn’t have her “i…

… middle of paper …

…sp; Every person that came in contact with Iago ended up dead or wounded in some way. Iago manipulated everyone he knew for his own means. In the end he got everything he wanted. He got revenge on Othello and ended up killing three people and seriously wounding one person in the process. One of the people who died was his own wife, but he could have cared less about that as long as he succeeded. If Iago was not around and did not carry with him the animosity, hatred, greed, and selfishness, none of those inimical things would have happened, but then, there wouldn’t be a play either. Bad characters are needed in plays and in life. If we always got what we wanted and bad things never happened, then life would be very boring. Iago tormented and played around with Othello’s mind, and he enjoyed this immensely, it was his goal and he achieved it.

Free Oedipus the King Essays: Metamorphosis of Oedipus

Metamorphosis of Oedipus in Oedipus Rex (the King)

The metamorphosis of Oedipus in Sophocles’ “Oedipus Rex” is sudden and climactic. Sophocles wrote the tragedy to bring a certain moral conclusion to fruition by the end of the novel. To have change, the character of Oedipus first had to reveal his tragic flaw. He begins the story as a brilliant conqueror and becomes a bereft and blind man at the play’s surface. However, the moral of the play is not merely the consequences of attempting to circumvent one’s fate. The running theme of the play is blindness, and Oedipus is blind the way through, comparable in every way to Sampson of the Bible.

A quick-witted man at first glance, Oedipus soon showed himself to be arrogant and narrow-minded in his dealings with Tiresias, Creon, and the Old Man. After solving the puzzle of the Sphinx, he went on to unknowingly kill his father and try to save another city. His destiny was laid before him prior to his journeys, and by choosing to try to dodge it, he first showed his blindness. Tiresias was Oedipus’ inverse at that point. He was the seer who had not vision while Oedipus had full use of his eyes, but was unwise and blinded to the events that circled him. Creon was cool-tempered and forgiving. After Oedipus harangued Creon with accusations of being in cahoots with Tiresias, Creon still wanted to bring the truth and have all be overlooked. At the end of the novel, Creon is kind towards Oedipus in his weakness, for even the strong fall. Oedipus is not aware that he has killed his father or is married to his own mother and has had children by her. As he realizes that the prophecies has come to pass because of and despite him, his alteration takes place.

Sampson was like Oedipus in many aspects of his character and life. Oedipus conquered the Sphinx; Sampson conquered an army using only a donkey’s jawbone. Oedipus grew weaker and weaker until he finally discovered the truth and was held accountable, as was Sampson. Both engaged in sexual immorality, though one was less deliberate than the other. Towards the end of their lives they were both physically blinded, but could see the truth and stood more upright because of it. Both Sampson and Oedipus experienced a metamorphosis in which they were originally the greatest men, but by placing themselves and their “wisdom” above the gods or God’s, they fell.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.