There were profound things that linked the American people who lived North and south of the country before the American civil war; they spoke the same language, were overwhelmingly Christian and Protestants, and they all shared a revolutionary heritage that tressured the founders of their nation. They not only gave people a voice in their own government but also the chance to rise economically. On the contrary, a series of issues also seemingly separated the North from the south; for example, the economy was far more industrial in the northern states while the confederate states mainly practiced cash crop farming. However, one of the prevailing sources of differences between the southern and the northern states was the institution of slavery, specifically whether the slaveholders would be allowed to take their enslaved people into northern territories and thus, expanding the empire of slavery. The importance of perception comes into play when one looks at the range of stereotypes that each side applied to the other. People in the free northern states looked at the south as a violent, lazy, poorly educated population that was made brutal by the presence of slavery. They also saw the south composed of a despised poor white class ruled by an oligarchy slaveholding class. People in the southern state looked at people from the North as grasping money-oriented people who did not care about family, societal order, or religion. They saw the northerners as people who only liked meddling in everyones affairs instead of looking after theirs. This paper argues that the anti-slavery and pro-slavery sentiments seen in America between the 18th and 18thcenturies reflect a broader dissent in-belief systems between the northern and the southern states.
One of the most overarching arguments used by enslavers and the pro-slavery group to bolster their confidence in slavery that unconsciously mirrors the dissent in the broader beliefs of the American people at the time was the social stability argument. Essentially, this argument was rooted in the southern worldview, which was profoundly conservative and richly organic. Their world was rooted in honor and tradition, and most important of all, it was crucial for them that their society displayed a particular order predicated on the notion of a social class composed of higher and lower beings. A hierarchy was baked into the society as it was; white people were naturally superior to black people. If someone wanted the proof of this notion, they just had to look at the reality of things: black people were the slaves, and white people were the masters. The pro-slavery camp, predominantly the south, reasoned that since the world came to them in a particular order (white people being higher in the hierarchy), overturning this order was invoking violence to the world as God made it. Everything that needed to be done ought to be done within the natural frame of reference that acknowledged that hierarchy is how the world is and always has been. James Henley Thornwell, an American pastor, religious writer, and slave owner, maintained that the conflict between slaveholders and abolitionists represented a broader ideological dispute between socialists, atheists, and Jacobins on one side and those who value regulated order on the other side.
It is important to note that the northern states also had a substantive amount of slaves; however, by the 1800s, northern states were gradually beginning to get rid of their slaves as the North was starting to become more metropolitan. Instead of large farms where slaves would provide free manual labor, the North was becoming a more city-oriented place with factories and manufacturing firms, unlike the south, where the so-called social stability was hinged on slavery. The social stability of the North was mainly dynamic, especially with the movement of people from England, Germany, and Ireland to the North to start working in the factories. The general perception in the North was that they did not need slavery anymore. Put differently, the northern culture changed towards industrialization while the south continued to keep their old rural and farm-based system around. This change in judgment in relation to the importance and viability of the enslaved people between the northern and the southern states is a classical form of dissent in belief systems between the North and the southern states that drove the anti-slavery-pro-slavery sentiments.
The civilizational argument” peddled by the pro-slavery group also sheds more light on the broader difference in beliefs between the south and the North in relation to slavery. The civilizational argument maintained that all great civilizations in the world have always depended on slavery for their growth. For this school of thought, while is it true that there are some undesirable aspects of slavery, for the most part, they turn out to be for the greater good.They cited other civilizations, such as the Greeks, and how they could write magnificent stage plays and philosophical works because the slaves took up large proportions of the nations manual labor demands. A notorious pro-slavery writer and lawyer from South Carolina, Edward Brown, maintained that “ slavery has been the stepping ladder by which nations have passed from barbarism to civilization .”Moreover, the free system of labor that began in Britain was already taking shape in the northern industrial states of America, and the southerners saw little to no difference between the free labor system practiced in the northern states and slavery practiced in the south as both systems exploited workers. The Southerners were in a better place to take good care of the workers (slaves) since they owned them as opposed to the free labor system practiced in the North and in Britain that seemed to Borrow or rent its workers.
On the other hand, the anti-slavery advocates from the North tended to be more educated and less religious; they thus had diverse and varied opinions on many aspects of humanity, ranging from philosophy, religion, and politics. In the North, “common” schools were put up so that even the poorest in society could get some schooling; they tended to have a loose interpretation of the constitution and a more liberal mindset than the south. With a more tolerant and progressive attitude, the North believed that other civilizations which used slaves did not merely imply that the practice was a noble one. The overall net effect of this was sectionalism, a belief that the northern states were superior to the countrys southern section. Under the faade of differences in sophistication lies broader regional differences responsible for the anti-slavery and pro-slavery sentiments of the late 18th and the 19th century.
The economic argument also proliferated the discourse for and against slavery, pointing to a broader difference in opinions, views, and thought processes among the proponents as well as opponents of slavery. According to the economic argument, slaves were property on the level of farming tools and costly, for that matter. The southern economy rose and fell on the backdrop of these tools and their ability to work properly, just as the northern economy rose and fell on the backs of its factories and industries. James Henry Hammond, a US senator from South Carolina, an attorney, and a slave owner, made this argument powerfully when he said that. The means, therefore, whatever they may have been, by which the African race, now in this country, have been reduced to slavery cannot affect us since they are our property as your land is your property. From this argument, it is clear that most pro-slavery sentiments saw slaves as farm tools and properties essential in the production of farm produce. These sentiments were reinforced by the climatic condition of the south that favored crop production. The souths climate is warmer, the summers are longer, the winter is mild, and the soil is fertile. The economic backbone of the south thus rested on agriculture.
Notwithstanding, the North had a much more diverse economy based on industries, with manufacturing being predominant. For decades factories sprung throughout the North, and large textile factories arrived from great Britain using the cotton grown in the south to produce clothes. Its industrial nature meant that it had more people in terms of demographics compared to the south. People lived in urban areas, majorly trading centers, art, education, and media thrived. The North was more connected in transport networks; it had more roads, canals, and railroads. Influential European thinkers such as Adam Smith and his most seminal work, TheWealth of Nations, had demonstrated that enslaved people were insufficient and costly forms of labor; these sentiments were taking effect in northern states. The industrial revolution was also already in full motion, and enslaving people for labor just had no place in the new economic form that was taking shape in the northern states. These differences in economies and means of production between the North and the south fueled differences in doctrines and ideologies in the North, driving their sentiments against slavery.
Another fundamental argument that points to a broader dissent in opinion between the proponents and opponents of slavery is the racial argument. Initially shared throughout America and Europe, the racial argument grew out of the belief that there is a fundamental inequality between the white and the black races, with the black race being inferior. In the minds of the southern pro-slavery group, it was an act of charity and benevolence to enslave people. An American social theorist and a prolific pro-slavery writer; George Fitzhugh, argued this point in a famous pro-slavery tract from 1854: The Negro is but a grown-up child that must be governed as a child, the master occupies towards him the place of a guardian or parent, like a wild horse he must be caught, tamed and domesticated.
While many of the North continued to hold the idea that the white race was superior to the black race, many viewed the morality of slavery differently. Between the 1700s and the 1800s, when former British colonies of North America staged a revolution against Great Britain to form the United States, they wrote a new constitution declaring that all men are equal and entitled to a government but failed to denounce slavery. This is seen in the infamous Three Fifths Compromise to the constitution that required the inclusion of the slave population in the apportioning of representation. However, there was the problem of the evil of slavery and its expansion into the west as many people avoided the clamor for space in the urban industrial towns; they dreaded the notion of having to compete with large cotton plantations with hundreds of slaves. The evils of slavery and the need to control and safeguard new western settlers from huge plantation owners from the newly established territories steered anti-slavery sentiments despite the view that the white race was superior.
The biblical argument was also a common sentiment among the pro-slavery camp occasionally wielded to justify slavery even though vehemently opposed by the latter’s opponents. According to this persuasion, the main argument is that if you look through all of the Bibles verses, you will see that nowhere is slavery condemned; in fact, it is encouraged. For the champions of slavery using this argument, even the apostle Paul in the New Testament, in his letter to the Ephesians church, addresses slaves directly instructing them to obey their masters in Ephesians 6:4.
Religious principles revolving around equality, freedom, and liberty seemed to go against the significant tenets of slavery, making many religious organizations question the morality and ethics of the institution of slavery in the context of religion. The Quakers, for example, maintained that slavery was an irredeemable sin as its principles went against Christian values. They then put forth a series of biblical verses to reinforce their argument. The Biblical argument for and against slavery was thus a difference in the interpretation of the Bible and biblical values among religious organizations. This is crucial since the biblical argument for and against slavery pinpoints a broader difference in religious opinions and viewpoints that existed at the time, not only among the religious class but also among the more conservative south and the more liberal and less religious North.
The pro-slavery and anti-slavery sentiments of the 18th and the 19th century points to a broader difference in belief systems in America between these periods. These sentiments encompass various domains ranging from religion, morality, economics, culture, and even development. Differences between religious values and those that seemed to underpin slavery differed between the more conservative south and the less conservative. Similarly, a change in economic “culture” with the North drifting towards industrialization while the south maintained a farm-based economic system indicated the broader economic changes that sparked pro-slavery and anti-slavery arguments, respectively. While the difference between the North and the south may seem to have been orchestrated by the need to abolish or maintain slavery, it represents a bigger difference in the beliefs systems of the North and the south in the 18th and 19th centuries.
Crosby, David L. “Anthony Benezet’s transformation of anti-slavery rhetoric.” Slavery and Abolition 23, no. 3 (2002): 39-58.
David, Huw T. “Transnational advocacy in the eighteenth century: transatlantic activism and the antislavery movement.” Global Networks 7, no. 3 (2007): 367-382.
Hammond, James Henry. “Speech of Hon. James H. Hammond, of South Carolina, on the relation of states; delivered in the Senate of the United States, May 21, 1860.” South Carolina Historical Books (1860).
Patterson, Orlando. “Slavery.” Annual review of sociology 3, no. 1 (1977): 407-447.
Watkins, Margaret. “Slaves among Us: The Climate and Character of EighteenthCentury Philosophical Discussions of Slavery.” Philosophy Compass 12, no. 1 (2017): e12393.
Womens Movement in Canada art history essay help: art history essay help
Womens Movement in Canada
Historically, there has been gender discrimination against women’s involvement in social, political, and economic activities. Men’s position in society used to be superior to women’s position as they were primarily responsible for reproduction, childcare, and housework (Sethna et al.). As a result of the profound unequal treatment of women in Canadian society, World War I and II provided an opportunity for women to fight for their rights to be treated equally to men (Cleverdon). Every woman has the right to political, ethical, moral, and legal choices. The women’s movement has made revolutionary developments since the 19th Century, from allowing women to perform paid work and to vote to participating in elective positions in political, social, and economic spheres in Canada. However, to achieve their current socio-economic and political status, women faced many challenges; for example, struggles and adverse discrimination in the Canadian labor unions. Therefore, this essay seeks to explore the women’s movement and struggles that were directly responsible for the current status enjoyed by women in Canada.
Since the 20th Century, women have faced significant challenges while seeking equal treatment in society; these include participation and demographic limitations (Tungohan, 484). From the feminist viewpoint, women had to take the upper hand in transforming labor power demographics and membership to suppress these challenges. Many factors oppressed women’s involvement in unions and movements. First, according to Cleverdon, some of the major challenges women face in the struggle for equity in Canadian unions is the work-life balance. Women engaged in paid work and unpaid work (housework), posing a challenge to have adequate time for union activities. Cleaning, cooking, and babysitting are examples of work done by women besides paid work. As a result, they had limited time to collectively analyze their issues to bargain for equity in unions and workplaces.
Secondly, the low wages received by women undermined their activities to engage actively and financially support their movement’s activities (Tungohan 489). Women were viewed as lesser beings, enabling the pay inequity to rise even more. Therefore, inadequate finance undermined women’s revolutionary and feminist movements. In addition, Chenier (299) aver that women received zero finances from the government to support their activities. Another challenge the women’s movement faced was the low number of members in labor unions. The low number of women membership in unions and workplaces contributed largely to being a shortcoming in the fight for equity by women. As the adage says, ‘unity is power,’ most equity-seeking women met a shortage of collective voices for their rights, hence an unequal representation in the unions (Cleverdon). The low number of women in unions limited the gender from taking leadership positions; thus, most of their plights were not considered. Consequently, they were never favored in decision-making as men dominated the unions.
Despite women’s struggles in Canadian labor unions, women continued to fight for equity. After a long struggle, they successfully overcame some of these challenges, for example, the passing of the Female Employees Fair Remuneration Act and the Fair Employment Practices Act in 1951 (Guard 1059). Women linked and got connected with other movements that also fought for equity, such as the anti-slavery and religious groups (Walker). It is essential to illuminate that the women’s movement and other equity-seeking movements in Canada are founded on similar grievances. Both movements fought against gender division at workplaces, racism, discrimination, harassment, and equality and equity in society and workstations.
Additionally, the women’s movement created alliances with various groups and enhanced their bargaining to fight for equal representation (Strong-Boag). Building a political coalition through alliances with groups with the same ideology marked the historical approach to women-organized labor unions. This argument links how women and other equity-seeking groups’ influenced labor unions for several years. Mobilization capacity expanded since the coalition made it possible for easy movements’ organizations at the grassroots. It also expanded the ward of organizing labor, redefined arguments on movements’ objectives, and motivated social change through visioning. They organized coalitions, networked, formed alliances with various NGOs to organize and discuss strategies, and articulate gender biases against women’s socio-demographic stance in the Canadian economy (Walker).
Considering women’s experiences in the 1950s, it is possible to understand their struggle. The famous Quebec movement remains the clear-cut example of the women’s movement. The Quebec-based women’s movement was well-orchestrated, highly structured, and influential in the fight for equity in Quebec, a province in Canada (Strong-Boag). Together with other women’s movements in the nation, the Quebec women’s movement challenged male domination in the nation’s diverse communities and the maintenance of common feminist politics. While the 20th Century was generally sanguine about fairness and equity, the women’s movement increasingly criticized the government’s withdrawal of support for equality in the 21st Century (Chenier 305). They became more defensive. Even after eliminating the Canadian Advisory Council on Status of Women in 1995, other agencies, such as the Coalition of Provincial and Territorial Advisory Councils on the Status of Women, were established to check the threats to equality in Canada (Guard 1060). Therefore, women have struggled for equality and fairness in Canadian society by tackling not only gender inequality but also inequality associated with sexualities and ability, race, ethnicity, and class.
On that account, womens rights have tremendously improved in Canada. Women’s movements struggled to improve women’s equal rights and strived to involve in political, economic, and social roles similar to men (Walker). As a result, Canada has taken several steps to improve equality and women’s rights; equal treatment for women and men in The Charter of Rights and Freedom, enabling the participation in politics and even taking high positions in Canadian politics, and introducing equal pay in workplaces (Tungohan 493).
To conclude, it is possible to suggest that the women’s movement in Canada has come a long way, and it will continue until there is total gender equality in socio-economic and political arenas. Also, in the face of continued inequality, the women’s movement has remained champions for a democratic and equitable Canada. Therefore, the main objective of the women’s movement is not to invade men in the socio-economic and political contexts but to gain respect and equity.
Chenier, Elise. “Love-politics: Lesbian wedding practices in Canada and the United States from the 1920s to the 1970s.” Journal of the History of Sexuality 27.2 (2018): 294-321.
Cleverdon, Catherine L. “The woman suffrage movement in Canada.” The Woman Suffrage Movement in Canada. University of Toronto Press, 2017.
Guard, Julie. “Christabelle Sethna and Steve Hewitt. Just Watch Us: RCMP Surveillance of the Womens Liberation Movement in Cold War Canada.” (2019): 1059-1060.
Sethna, Christabelle, and Steve Hewitt. Just watch us: RCMP surveillance of the womens liberation movement in cold war Canada. McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP, 2018.
Strong-Boag, Veronica. “Women’s Movements In Canada: 1985Present | The Canadian Encyclopedia.” Thecanadianencyclopedia.ca. N.p., 2022. Web. 27 Apr. 2022.
Tungohan, Ethel. “The transformative and radical feminism of grassroots migrant women’s movement (s) in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 50.2 (2017): 479-494.
Walker, Gillian A. “Family violence and the women’s movement.” Family Violence and the Women’s Movement. University of Toronto Press, 2019.
Discussion on Response to Christine Whislers gcse history essay help
Response to Christine Whislers Discussion Post 1
Thanks for sharing your view on the roles of health administrators. Your analysis is concise, and your focus on going directly and answering the question is exemplary. Healthcare administrators have crucial roles in improving the healthcare system in several ways. The roles of a healthcare administrator that you have explored have shown me that being a healthcare administrator can be an enriching profession. Your analysis has demonstrated tremendous opportunities to effect change in the healthcare system, from formulating health policies to establishing other significant health schemes.
In addition, according to Selsor (2020), it is crucial to note that the primary purpose of healthcare administrators is to interpret policies and regulations as they are applied in the healthcare system. Selsor (2020) also avers that healthcare administrators research and assist in formulating and implementing procedures that facilitate hospital patient care. Therefore, healthcare administrators are responsible for keeping the healthcare organization compliant with policies as part of their duties.
I have also noted that you mentioned in your post that health administrators could implement policies due to their expertise. It makes me want to know about their expertise; therefore, it could be better to mention what specific expertise. For example, you may say that their knowledge of business administration and operations makes them vital for policy implementation. This is because health administrators need a strong understanding of business principles to ensure that professionals implement the stipulated policies (Slyter, 2019). Also, your point in rulemaking is unclear. I am unable to understand where they are almost always invited. Could you kindly clarify?
Selsor, W. (2020). Managerial Competencies Driving Successful Change Initiatives: A Multiple Case Study of Healthcare Administrators (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Slyter, K. (2019). 10 Healthcare Administration Skills You’ll Need in Order to Lead. Rasmussen.edu. Retrieved 26 April 2022, from https://www.rasmussen.edu/degrees/health-sciences/blog/healthcare-administration-skills/.
Importance of Proper Asset Classification advanced higher history essay help: advanced higher history essay help
Importance of Proper Asset Classification
The reason taxpayers must classify assets when it comes to depreciation correctly is to adhere to the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). One goal for proper classification is the accurate measurement of taxable income, with increased accuracy in measuring depreciation, which leads to effective marginal tax rates on investments in depreciable assets (Miemiec, 2018). Additionally, correctly classifying assets provides an accurate picture of critical financial metrics such as cash flow and working capital to taxpayers (business leaders) (Miemiec, 2018). Asset classification can also aid taxpayers in qualifying for a loan since it gives the banks an accurate view of the risk taken and be able to calculate liabilities (Spilker, 2022). Therefore, when it comes to the purposes of taxation, assets are classified by both physical existence and usage;
The type of asset is essential during the period an asset is in use. In the physical existence class, assets are classified as tangible and intangible, where tangible assets have a physical existence, such as buildings, while intangible assets lack physical existence, such as trademarks (Spilker, 2022). These types of assets allow for their respective depreciation on each; thus, each asset has set rules for classifying ordinary and capital gain incomes (Miemiec, 2018).
Asset usage determines whether deductions are allowed for the current annual expenditures. The asset must have a business purpose- it must be used in business to provide income for deductions to be taken from the asset (Spilker, 2022). Since this is a fundamental requirement for deductions, Miemiec (2018) aver that assets for individual use are not allowed for any deductions. Therefore, proper asset classification of usage is essential to determine taxable asset income.
Miemiec, W. (2018). Depreciation Methods and Rates as an Instrument of Optimization of Direct Taxes. In Optimization of Organization and Legal Solutions concerning Public Revenues and Expenditures in Public Interest (Conference Proceedings), ed. Ewa Lotko, Urszula K. Zawadzka-Pk, Michal Radvan (pp. 729-744). Temida 2.
Spilker, B. (2022). McGraw-Hill’s Taxation of Individuals and Business Entities 2022 Edition, 13e. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Social Work Biopsychosocial Assessment advanced higher history essay help
Overview of Research Outline
1. Section I: The Person
a. Identifying Information
b. Brief on Presenting Problem
d. Education and Work Experience
e. , Environmental Factors
2. Section II: The Presenting Problem
a. History of the Presenting Problem
b. Needs of the Client In Relation to the Presenting Problem
c. Coping Efforts used by Client before Presenting for Services
d. Impact of Presenting Problem to the Client
e. Clients Current Psychosocial Functioning
3. Section III: Goals, Strengths, and Challenges
a. Clients Stated Goals for Service
b. Sources of Strength for the Client
c. Clients Motivation for Using the Service and for Change
d. Potential Barriers that Could Work Against the Client
Social Work Biopsychosocial Assessment, Ecomap, Genogram, Outline
Section I: The Person
Valentino Rossi was born in San Diego, California, on 14th May 1995. His marital status still reflects single. He is an Italian-American young man raised in a Christian background. He is a confessing Christian, as evident from the environment he grew up in. He currently lives with his parents in Boston, Massachusetts, working as an assistant cost engineer in a construction firm. Valentino suggests, I have worked in this construction firm for four years now, and I still dont feel like this is what I was purposed to do. Whenever I come back home from work, I feel like it was just another wasted day. I have struggled to correlate my existence in this line of work and why in the first place I chose this course. From the previous response, it is clear that Mr. Valentino suffers from mild depression due to his wrong career decision.
How bad is it? I asked. He hesitantly answered, My current job, something that I dislike, my dread of losing my occupation, and my financial obligations have rendered my life so difficult that I only have ever thought of committing suicide. Mr. Valentino arrived on time for the interview, dressed in khaki shorts and a collared shirt, is pigmented, claims to be 6′ 9″, and weighs approximately 171 pounds. He exercises by jogging for four kilometers every day and goes to the gym for at least an hour. He didn’t have any rings or jewelry, but he had a silver Rolex wristwatch. He shuffled around a lot in his armchair at first, and his fists were constantly tapping on the armrest of his armchair.
Mr. Valentino later on sat back in his armchair for about 3 minutes, wiping tears off his face periodically as he explained his works effect on his family, circle of friends, and relationship troubles with his girlfriends. He seeks counseling to help him overcome long-term feelings of inadequacy, despair, and shame that have persisted for further than two years and originated with his personality disorder several years ago.
Valentinos father and mother are called Sebastian Rossi and Amanda Cook. The former was born on 2nd February 1963, while the latter was born on 26th August 1969. They both live and work in Boston, Massachusetts. Mr. Sebastian is an architect at a large consulting firm and works there as the technical director, while his mother works as the head of marketing in the same company. So far, their relationship with Valentino has been shaky ever since he told them that he was planning to quit his job. They have not taken the news with ease and are unwilling to let the family legacy shatter. This is because close to every person in their lineage has been engaged in construction-related fields as far as the 3rd generation backward.
Valentino has only one younger sister, Maria Carolina. She was born on 2nd April 1998. She also stays with her parents in Boston and schools at Northeastern University, pursuing a degree in Construction Management. According to Valentino, there is less interruption in the relationship between the client and his sister. Maria claims to understand his brother’s state well. The client observes the current religious practices presented by the Church he attends. He regularly attends the Living Water Ministry together with his parents and sibling. He believes that he’s a casual follower of the Church. He also intends to talk with the Pastor of the Church about his issue though he, later on, changed his mind.
Being an assistant cost engineer, Valentino studied at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and completed where he completed his bachelors in Cost Engineering. Immediately he finished college; he was absorbed into the industry due to the outstanding results he achieved in school. So far, Valentino he served as an Assistant Cost Engineer since he graduated till currently, which is approximately four years. He claims to have delivered four projects during his stay in that firm and still now handling an ongoing construction project. Valentino is very remorseful for enrolling in the cost engineering course as an undergraduate. He may not deliberately state that the paycheck is handsome, but the stress he is going through is related to a lack of contentment with his career. He feels like he should have followed his dreams of being a journalist.
Apart from Valentinos family members, he has a girlfriend, Kelly, whom hes been dating for five years. Kelly is a practicing nurse in a hospital in Boston. He also has two close friends, Marcus and Geoffrey. Marcus works as a video editing manager at a television network company, whereas Geoffrey is a bank assistant manager. With his friends, Valentino often meets every Friday evening to go bowling. They also enjoy constantly bike riding on Urban Adventures on weekends, a bike tour lasting approximately 3 hours. Valentino and Kelly attend the same Church where she ministers in the choir.
Section II: The Presenting Problem
This feeling started early when I was in high school, especially when my dad began taking me to his workplace, Valentino confesses. The problem became a reality when his father, on many occasions, would urge him to study hard in school and obtain good grades to get the opportunity to do Architecture. He had tried to bring the matter to the table when he was with his mother. This, however, never ended well after the father was alerted. Rossi shared how much he dreamt of being a sports news anchor with his sister. The client decided to reach out at this specific timeline since he is in a tight spot both at work and. He is yet to be promoted as the operations manager at work, whereas, at home, his father and mother want to start a construction firm which they believe will be later passed down to their kids for management.
These issues presented here only leave Valentino between a rock and a hard place. The prevalent contributing course is that he has received an offer for a scholarship to join a specific university and pursue journalism. This was organized by Marcus, who wanted to support him fulfill his dreams. By Maslows Hierarchy of needs. Valentino is deficient in love and belongingness need. This is quite evident from his workplace and parents. He feels detached from his career, while most people he thought would understand him are against his opinion (McLeod, 2020). The fulfillment of such a need is due to his parents self-centeredness toward their heritage and not having room for their son to express himself. Also, his workplace has no proper strategy geared towards assessing the rate of employee satisfaction.
To suppress Rossis feelings, he and his friends have been engaging in alcoholism, especially when they go bowling on Friday evenings. Howe, ver, this has not been that of help since he gets to face the challenge all over again on Monday. This is quite an excellent but poor method used by many people suffering from depression. When faced with unforeseen or even foreseen challenges, most people run to console themselves with booze. Having friends who believe in such only accelerates the process, which now creeps in like an addiction. Due to his current state, the client is on the verge of experiencing a dysfunctional relationship with his parents. Their expectations being cut short by his decision will only render them heartbroken. The ripple effect from the microsystem, i.e., parents, will only grow to affect his current job now that they might lose a competent aspirant for the operation managers seat (Javanmardi, 2019).
At the moment, Valentinos mental health is at stake due to the early tangible signs of depression. This also can be linked with the drinking problem that he has. Juggling between his current career and his passion as a journalist has brought too much mental strain on him. This condition has escalated and has an anticipated soar relationship between him and his parents (Sanneke, 2021). Depression as a significant functional impairment might seriously cloud Valentinos brain from thinking straight in addressing the problem at hand. He may break down instead of brainstorming relevant ideas to counter his current situation at home and work. Also, having friends who have not yet discovered a long-lasting way of helping their friend leaves him more vulnerable.
Section III: Goals, Strengths, and Challenges
Valentino clearly stated, I only want my sanity to be restored. Also, if possible, make my parents understand that I dont have to fulfill the so-called construction heritage to identify as a family member. He is convinced that if this exercise can streamline his career and make his parents abstain from the clich of following the lineages code of conduct, he can even settle and even sees a possibility of starting a family with Kelly. A remarkable trait exhibited by Rossi is the ability to intentionally forfeit his desires and dreams to fulfill his parents wants. This he does by placing his parents aspirations before his. Valentino is in the contemplation trans-theoretical stage of change because he is conscious that this issue is inexistent and is considering how to solve it; he has not yet committed to taking a course of action (Worth, 2022). He boldly chose to share his experience with ease, indicating he is desperate for change. He had even had the opportunity to talk to Kellys mother, who had promised always to support whatever he chose.
The only potential barrier is his parents intention to start a company they are confident will be run by him and his sister. And since the sister is still in school, he will be the one to carry the more significant chunk of responsibilities. From the clients family, the father, being the most influential, is a significant substantial barrier to Valentinos change. He has the potency of presenting an authoritative command to dictate his sons fate. The only retarding social environment that the client is exposed to is his indulging in alcoholism accompanied by very supportive friends.
In conclusion, long-term counseling is recommended due to Mr. Valentino’s depression, which is producing difficulties at home and work. Mr. Rossi has promised to use his healthcare coverage to talk to a therapist and has committed to 3 months of counseling provided he finds one. After the first three months, Mr. Valentino has arranged a meeting with me to discuss other alternatives, such as mental therapy. Meanwhile, he has made an appointment with me once per 2 weeks to update me on his current status on his level of stress.
Javanmardi, E., & Liu, S. (2019). Exploring Grey Systems Theory-Based Methods and Applications in Analyzing Socio-Economic Systems. Sustainability, 11(15), 4192. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4192
McLeod, S. A., (2020). Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html
Sanneke, de Haan, (2021). Bio-Psycho-Social Interaction: an enactive perspective. International Review of Psychiatry, 33(5), 471-477. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09540261.2020.1830753
Worth, P. (2022). An Introduction to the Trans-Theoretical Model of Change. In Positive Psychology across the Lifespan (pp. 113-128). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003132530-7/introduction-trans-theoretical-model-change-piers-worth