Get help from the best in academic writing.

Plath’s Stings – An Analysis

Plath’s Stings – An Analysis

“Stings” is a feminist poem by Sylvia Plath. The last two stanzas are important in understanding Plath’s feeling while writing the poem.

In lines fifty-one through sixty the speaker conveys that, although she may have been a drudge before, she will not be one any more. She refuses to submit to society and be a hard working drudge. The speaker believes she is more than that — perhaps even a queen: “They thought death was worth it, but I have a self to recover, a queen.”

The speaker in the poem realizes that she has the potential to be a queen, and she didn’t want to give up on that dream. She wanted to get away from her drudge-like surroundings that had once killed her spirit. She would ‘rise above the fray’ and get away from “the engine that killed her- the mausoleum, the wax house.” The beehive had become more of a prison, and she wants to get away from it very badly.

The last two stanzas are important because they are metaphoric for the way women are suppressed and forced to stay at home — doing the cleaning and watching the children. It was considered wrong and out of the norm if a woman wished to get a career for her own. Plath is trying to tell us that women who have become “drudges” as a result of marriage have more potential than just being house keepers and baby-makers.

Other stylistic elements that Plath uses include imagery and symbolism. She is very vivid in describing the way the bee looks in the last two stanzas: ”With her lion-red body, her wings of glass… scar in the sky, red comet.” The words create a clear picture in of what she must have looks like, escaping the “mausoleum,” a symbol of the beehive and, therefore, of the speaker’s entrapment. It “killed her,” or rather, killed her spirit.

Oedipus the King: The Tragic Flaws of Oedipus

Fate chose him to kill his dad, marry his mom, and discover it all in Oedipus Rex, Sophocles’ tragedy. Oedipus was so determined to save Thebes from the plague bestowed on them by Apollo. But little did he know that he was the source of it all. His constant reversal of fortune, neutrality, and suffering make him the perfect example of a classic Greek tragic hero.

One moment, Oedipus is brimming with hope; the next, he’s sure that he is the killer of his father, King Laius. Every time Oedipus thinks that it can’t possibly be him, evidence proves otherwise. His wife, Jocasta, attempts to prove his innocence but “lets out part of the dire secret by her allusion to the ‘triple crossroads’” (Haigh). By attempting to assist Oedipus, she makes matters worse by causing him to remember his terrible assault upon several travelers at that very place. But then, the reversal comes in. Along comes a messenger with news of King Polybus’ death, which gives Oedipus false hope: “…but [Polybus] is dead and buried, / And I am here – I never touched him…” (Oedipus Rex. II. 3. 919-920). He now thinks that he couldn’t have killed his father, because he’s under the assumption that Polybus was his dad, when in reality Laius is his real father. Anyway, with yet another reversal of fortune, he reaches the deciding moment where he breaks down. When the shepherd that saved him from certain death on Mt. Cithaeron many years ago reveals the truth to Oedipus, he can do nothing but completely break down: “Ah God! / It was true! / All the prophecies!” (II. 4. 1119). The man that saved him in the first place dissolves all of Oedipus’ “hope,” as Oedipus comes to the ultimate realization that although he went to such great lengths, he could not avoid fulfilling …

… middle of paper …


In the end, Sophocles pours all of this reversal, neutrality, and suffering into one character, and it works out very nicely. The end result is a perfect tragic hero that ties the whole story together. Oedipus makes the tragedy a great one. From the noble quest of trying to save Thebes from the plague, to the discovery of the truth of his crime: Oedipus took the full journey of the typical tragic hero, and it ended with his ultimate fall.

Works Cited

“A.E. Haigh.” Theatre Database. January 18, 2007 .

Costas and Switzer, Ellen. Greek Myths: Gods, Heroes and Monsters: Their Sources, Their Stories and Their Meanings. New York City: Atheneum Books for Young Readers, 1998.

Sophocles. Oedipus Rex. World Literature. Writers, Susan Wittig Albert, et al. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, 2001.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.