Get help from the best in academic writing.

Personal Purpose Statement Essay

The subject is about the leadership in education:

Personal Purpose Statement

Please put those words as much as possible:

I want to lead with examples and be able to make appositive change on others’ live.

The first element for any success leader is the “Ethics” Ethics and moral come first. They are the cornerstone for any leading.

I chose the leadership department because I need to, make some changes in the education department in my own country.

I always a critical thinker.

Please put: That I always share the good news with my team.

I do to not hastate when others need my help.

I always Listen to the team and respect their ideas.

I want to lead not only from front, because leaders need to lead form all the sides to see what their followers need to.

I belie that political should be away from school system.

Be an educational leader require to be accepting feedback.

I promise:

To be present by listening, happy by sharing and stay positive with others at same level

Learned that asking more question opens more gates of knowledge.

Keeping questions without asking will kill the creativity.

My vision is clear, I now where I am and where to go.

Diversity,

Everyone should have opportunity to learn.

Equity, empathy

Please be positive and enthusiastic . Thank you

Victoria 2 Lucent Technologies Question 1: According to the available data, it

Victoria 2

Lucent Technologies

Question 1:

According to the available data, it is clear that DuPont’s Decomposition indicates that the biggest contributor to the variation between the quarterly performance figures is net income. Significant variations in the net revenues can be observed in the below table, for example, a shift from $186 in the first quarter of 1998 to $1,523in the fourth quarter of the same year. There are also some notable significant variations in assets, for example, a shift from $23,811 in the third quarter of 1997 to $38,735 in the third quarter of 1999.

ROE = Profit Margin *Total Asset Turnover *Equity multiplier

 

1999

1998

1997

Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1

Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1

Q4

Q3

Total Revenue

$9,905

$10,575

$9,315

$8,220

$9,842

$8,574

$7,642

$6,184

$8,724

$6,933

Net Income

$1,175

$972

$829

$457

$1,523

$647

$518

$186

$1,124

$369

Total Assets

$38,634

$38,735

$37,156

$32,840

$31,641

$26,720

$26,279

$24,664

$24,762

$23,811

Total Shareholder Equity

$16,079

$13,622

$12,403

$9,051

$8,437

$5,534

$4,922

$5,036

$4,671

$3,387

Net Margin

11.86%

9.19%

8.90%

5.56%

15.47%

7.55%

6.78%

3.01%

12.88%

5.32%

Asset Turnover

0.26

0.27

0.25

0.25

0.31

0.32

0.29

0.25

0.35

0.29

Equity Multiplier

2.40

2.84

3.00

3.63

3.75

4.83

5.34

4.90

5.30

7.03

ROE

7.31%

7.14%

6.68%

5.05%

18.05%

11.69%

10.52%

3.69%

24.06%

10.89%

Question 2:

The table below indicates some developing patterns from the last quarter (Dec-1998) of 1998 to the second quarter (June-1999) of 1999. This can be accounted for after reducing the rates for the two following quarters. The classifications are gross margin, inventory growth, account receivable growth, and sales growth.

The explanations provided by the Lucent managers do not substantiate the earnings shortfall. The company shows decreased performance. Unfavorable policies seem to be the reason for the company’s decrease in sales and revenues. Moreover, for the company to remain competitive in the market, it needed to align itself with the changing technology and consumer needs and preferences.

Adjusted Change

Dec-99

Sep-99

Jun-99

Mar-99

Dec-98

Sales Growth

0.64%

23.34%

21.89%

32.92%

12.82%

Account Receivable Growth

10.43%

50.43%

63.78%

56.96%

45.91%

Inventory Growth

42.40%

63.84%

74.20%

50.73%

45.08%

Gross Margin Growth

-10.86%

17.86%

26.05%

41.67%

23.95%

Question 3:

After the submission of the 8-K form has occurred, the company will definitely be unable to continue the streak. There is also a decrease in the organization’s sales attributed to higher consumer demands and changes in technology.

The lawsuit against the company (Lucent) had merit and strong supporting evidence since the company was fully aware of its investment in an organization dealing with new technology. Also, the new company’s operations were not in line with the moral operational standards, although the documentation provided showed that the company was following legal steps. The documents also showed that the organization used manipulations to increase income levels.

I believe that through the available information, the organization will be incapable of recovering by the second quarter of 2000 due to reduced gross margins and inventory and receivables issues. The company’s economic health shows a downward slope pattern which is likely to hinder its recovery. Moreover, Lucent had achieved its apex, and the company’s future prosperity hinged on income growth in the fiercely competitive optic networking sector. Their new solutions did not seem to be performing well, and they could not adapt quickly enough to changes in their customers’ expectations. They appear to be facing manufacturing and deployment issues and a slew of market uncertainties. According to the available information and data, the company is likely to require more time than anticipated to recover financially, establish its reputation, and build back the trust with stakeholders and the general public. The process may be long and costly but has been argued to be common for many firms.

Surname 3 Student’s name Professor’s name Course number Date Personal Code A

Personal Purpose Statement Essay Writing Assignment Help Surname 3

Student’s name

Professor’s name

Course number

Date

Personal Code

A personal code of conduct guides how individuals carry themselves ethically around the workplace and any environment where an order is required. These codes of conduct help handle absurd behaviors such as harassment and conflict of interest. This paper seeks to explore my personal code of conduct that I can display at work and those that I am not supposed to display.

I will be very respectful of all the employees and my seniors in a work environment. Respect encompasses actions taken in responding to an individual when asked about something or the attentiveness one gives their job. Employees need to respect their respective positions by discharging their professional skills and competency as required of them. Therefore, I will always ensure that I give maximum respect to my seniors and the delegated roles.

I will exercise integrity in the quest to execute my duties. As an employee upholding a high level of integrity is a subject that needs much attention since, without integrity, there is a likelihood of deviation from the right channel by the employee (Giorgini et al.,126). Exercising integrity will ensure that I am honest and accountable in my line of duty. A high level of integrity fosters trusts among team members and generates generosity in helping others accomplish their targets in the organization.

As an employee of an organization, I will ensure that I uphold a high level of confidentiality. Certain organizations have critical information that should not be leaked to their competitors, thereby making it necessary for employees of the organization to be high confidential with the information they have at their disposal (Giorgini et al.,129). I will only focus on what I am delegated to do to uphold a high level of objectivity, ensuring that I meet the objective and mission of the organization.

Lying is not acceptable in the organization, and I will ensure that I am always honest with the information and the responsibilities given to me by my seniors. Stealing is unethical and punishable. I will ensure that I refrain from activities that might compromise my good morals and be tempted to steal the organization’s resources.

Fighting at work is unethical and harmful to an individual’s health. I will refrain from engaging in fights with my teammates but rather find an amicable way of solving disputes. I will ensure that I do not become abusive or display behaviors that might tarnish my reputation in the organization (Giorgini et al.,133). Violation of the policies put in place by the organization is unethical behavior that should not be tolerated in an organization.

Work Cited

Giorgini, Vincent et al. “Researcher Perceptions Of Ethical Guidelines And Codes Of Conduct”. Accountability In Research, vol 22, no. 3, 2015, pp. 123-138. Informa UK Limited, https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.955607. Accessed 25 Apr 2022.

1 Macroeconomics (Budget constraints & Household maximization problem) Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation

1

 Macroeconomics (Budget constraints & Household maximization problem)

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course Name and Number

Instructor’s Name

Date

 Macroeconomics (Budget constraints & Household maximization problem)

Question 1

The unit of households that represents the overall economy is referred to as a representative household. This indicates that if two households are supposed to exist in an economy, this implies that they are representative of those families. In most economies, we assume the presence of two sectors at the same time: household and government. In comparison to the government sector, it is responsible for all management responsibilities, the household sector is crucial for stimulating demand in the economy. Given the constrained resource availability in the economy, we must take the limits of these resources into account first. The term “constraint” refers to a limitations placed by monetary circumstances. It is mainly monetary income for households and government revenue from the general public. The following is a list of them:

Budget constraints for Household:

M (y1+y2)=c1×a0+c2×a1

Budget constraints for Government:

M (g1+g2)=r1×t1+r2×t2

These are the assumed budget limitations based on the information provided in the question, with ‘r’ denoting the tax rate (for both periods) and ‘c’ denoting the amount of money spent by those households. The assumptions of the model play a critical role in almost all of these equations in which both sectors have equal commitment and inclusion. Individual entities play a crucial role in sustaining the equality and legitimacy essential for the survival of both sectors.

Question 2

Looking at an open economy that spans two time periods. Exogenous output is provided in each period Y1 and Y2.

A representative consumer maximizes life-time utility U = u(C1) + βu(C2) where C1 and C2 are consumption in the two periods and β is a subjective discount factor, 0 < β < 1.The country can borrow and lend in world markets at a given real interest rate, r. The initial asset is zero. Hence, the budget constraint can be written C1 + C2 1 + r = Y1 + Y2 1 + r 1. Derive the first order condition for optimal consumption and interpret it. Solution Using the method of substitution (if you want, use Lagrange method).

Solve the budget constraint for C2 C2 = Y1(1 + r) + Y2 − (1 + r)C1 (1) and substitute the constraint into the objective function

U = u(C1) + βu(Y1(1 + r) + Y2 − (1 + r)C1) (2)

Maximize the objective function

That is how much C1 you have to give up to get one more unit C2. In optimum MRS (C1, C2)=relative price. If MRS > 1 1+r you can increase utility by trading C1 for C2 and vice versa if MRS < 1 1+r .2

Derive the welfare effects of an increase in r, i.e dU/dr. Provide intuition. (use the envelope condition) solution Substituting 1 into 3 , gives us one equation to the determine optimal period 1 consumption C ∗ 1 as function of the exogenous variables C ∗ 1 (r, Y1, Y2).

Optimal period two consumption follows from eq.

1: C ∗ 2 (r, Y1, Y2) = (1 + r) Y1 + Y2 − (1 + r) C ∗ 1 (r, Y1, Y2).

Substituting this into the objective function gives the indirect utility function,

U ∗ (r, Y1, Y2) = u(C ∗ 1 (r, Y1, Y2)) + βu (Y1(1+r)+Y2−(1+r)C ∗ 1 (r, Y1, Y2))

To see how welfare is affected by an increase in the interest rate we derive

∂U∗ /∂r = u 0 (C ∗ 1) ∂C∗ 1 ∂r + βu0 (C ∗ 2 ) Y1 − C ∗ 1 − (1 + r) ∂C∗ 1 ∂r = βu0 (C ∗ 2 ) (Y1 − C ∗ 1 ) + ∂C∗ 1

∂r [u 0 (C ∗ 1) − (1 + r) βu0 (C ∗ 2)]

In optimum the FOC holds,

u 0 (C ∗ 1 )−(1 +r)βu0 (C ∗ 2 ) = 0, and we are left with

∂U∗ /∂r = βu0 (C ∗ 2) (Y1 − C ∗ 1)

We the see that the sign of the welfare effect depends on the sign of (Y1 − C ∗ 1), that is whether the country is a borrower or a lender in the first period.

If the country is a lender in the first period Y1 > C∗ 1, welfare improves when the interest rate increase.

Question 3

What additional effect does assuming Y2 > 0 have?

A reduction in p2 diminishes the value of period 2 endowments in a solution with a positive Y2. As a result, there is a negative wealth impact that lowers both C1 and C2.

Note that the income effect is given by ∂C1 ∂I C2 3 where I = Y1 + p2Y2. The wealth effect is given by − ∂C1 ∂I ∂I ∂p2 = − ∂C1 ∂I Y2 Hence the combined income and wealth effect is (C2 − Y2) ∂C1 ∂I 5

Suppose a foreign country has the same preferences as the home country, equal date 1 output Y ∗ 1 = Y1 but different date 2 output Y ∗ 2

(a) Assume higher income growth in the home country, that is, Y2 > Y ∗ 2 . Derive the autarky interest rate in both countries and compare. Solution

The autarky interest rate rA is the interest rate that induces the agent to set consumption equal to income in both periods (the only possible allocation in a closed economy, as we don’t have real capital in our model).

With CRRA utility the FOC in autarky is βC− 1 σ 2 C − 1 σ 1 = 1 1 + rA

We find the autarky interest rate by inserting for the only possible equilibrium allocation when there’s no trade Ct = Yt and solve for the interest rate 1 + rA = 1 β Y2 Y1 1 σ 1 + r ∗ A = 1 β Y ∗ 2 Y ∗ 1 1 σ r ∗ A < rA The home country has a higher income growth. As a result, if the domestic interest rate was the same as the foreign interest rate, the domestic country would desire to borrow in period 1. However, borrowing is not feasible under autarky, thus the home autarky interest rate must rise to lessen the borrowing motivation.

In additional, how can we be certain that as interest rates rise, the borrowing motivation will fall, or, conversely, the saving drive will rise? We know that the substitution impact tends to lower C1 and therefore boost saving, and because the Home nation prefers to borrow if the interest rate matches the Foreign autarky rate r*A, the overall wealth and income effect is negative (Y2 > C2 as long as you are a borrowing), which also reduces C1.

Question 4

A supply shock is an occurrence that makes output across the economy more difficult, expensive, or impossible for at least certain industries. In every economy, an increase in the cost of vital commodities such as gasoline leads fuel costs to surge, making it expensive to use for commercial reasons.

Assuming that a0 = A0/P1

We get

C ∗ 2 (r, Y1, Y2) = (1 + r) Y1 + Y2 − (1 + r) C ∗ 1 (r, Y1, Y2)

Bearing this in mind we have two players in the economy therefore the prices in period 1 is likely to increase. Therefore the government needs to regulate the economy since a1 ≥ 0. The government can only change its tax plan to ensure that the economy flows in a systematic manner.