https://www.jns-journal.com/article/S0022-510X(21)00277-X/pdf ( tony )
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034883
( cynthia)
I attached other 2 students article at the bottom.
IRAC Worksheet IRAC Format Facts: ISSUE: #1: #2: #3 RULE of LAW:
IRAC Worksheet
IRAC Format
Facts:
ISSUE:
#1:
#2:
#3
RULE of LAW:
ANALYSIS:
CONCLUSION:
worldwide.erau.edu
All rights are reserved. The material contained herein is the copyright property of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Florida, 32114. No part of this material may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written consent of the University.
worldwide.erau.edu
All rights are reserved. The material contained herein is the copyright property of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Florida, 32114. No part of this material may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written consent of the University.
CFS 3500, Cultural and Societal Issues Affecting Families Journal Entry Rubric Reflect
of covid 19 infection on health outcomes of stroke patients Nursing Assignment Help CFS 3500, Cultural and Societal Issues Affecting Families
Journal Entry Rubric
Reflect on the assigned reading(s). Share your reactions, thoughts, and feelings. Do not worry about censoring your submission. Instead, provide honest and critical responses, and reflect on any personal experience or ideas you have regarding the topic. Oversharing is encouraged!
Each of your answers should be detailed; a simple one-sentence reply will not suffice. Please review the criteria below so you know what is expected. It is strongly suggested that you type your answers in Microsoft Word and then copy and paste your work into the message box to avoid issues with formatting.
Criteria
Needs Improvement
Minimal Participation
Acceptable Comprehension
Outstanding Work
Reaction
0 points
The student did not participate in this portion of the journal entry.
5 points
The student’s reaction did not support the theme of the journal entry and/or the student did not respond to each question posed.
10 points
The student’s reaction was vague, and/or the student did not provide enough detail.
15 points
The student provided critical and relevant responses to each question posed.
Reflection
0 points
The student did not participate in this portion of the journal entry.
5 points
The student did not reflect on their experiences or ideas.
10 points
The student’s reflection was vague, and/or the student did not provide enough detail.
15 points
The student reflected on their personal experiences and applied these in their answer.
Mechanics
0 points
The student’s work was unacceptable.
2 points
The student’s post had several capitalization, grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
4 points
The student’s post had some capitalization, grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
8 points
The student’s post had no errors with regard to capitalization, grammar, punctuation, or spelling.
Format
0 points
The student’s work was unacceptable.
1 point
One of the three appearance criterion were met.
3 points
Two of the three appearance criterion were met.
6 points
The student (1) presented their answers in numbered paragraph form, (2) did not retype the questions, and (3) provided a minimum of 500 words.
Originality
0 points
The student quoted material directly from an assigned reading and/or another source and did not present any original information.
1 point
The student’s answers had little original thought, and/or the student quoted large amounts of material found in other sources.
3 points
The student’s answers had some original thought, but the student presented plagiarized information found in other sources.
6 points
The student’s answers were authentic and thought provoking. The student presented information without plagiarizing their ideas.
Total Points
50 points possible
[Type text][Type text][Type text]
Based upon your reading content from Week 2, concerning the work of
Based upon your reading content from Week 2, concerning the work of Jurgen Habermas, please address the following in a brief essay: 1) explain and give a key example of at least three components of his theory of communicative action; 2) explain why or why not you think that applying his theory of communicative action would be for the benefit of society; 3) provide a concise definition of the “life world,” and give at least one example of how the life world has been compromised, or damaged, in modern society. Share a current event related to that example. Include a brief description of the current event and its connection to your discussion
Essays must be at least 4 pages (not including title page and abstract – abstract not necessary), and double-spaced. Essays must be in APA format and sources must be properly cited.
SATYA NADELLA AT MICROSOFT: ANALYZING THE CASE Running head: SATYA NADELLA AT
SATYA NADELLA AT MICROSOFT: ANALYZING THE CASE
Running head: SATYA NADELLA AT MICROSOFT: ANALYZING THE CASE
HOW TO USE THIS TEMPLATE:
This is a template and checklist corresponding to your Assignment 2 Part A paper, in which you analyze the “Satya Nadella at Microsoft: Instilling a Growth Mindset” case study.
See below for an explanation of the color coding in this template:
All green text includes instructions to support your writing. You should delete all green text before submitting your final paper.
All blue text indicates areas where you need to replace the instructions with your own information. Replace the blue text with your own words in black.
Headings and subheadings are written in black, bold type. Keep these headings in your paper.
TIPS:
Write in the third person, using “he”, “she” or “they”, or specific names. Do not use the second person “you” or the first person, “I” in your case study analysis.
Use one-inch margins and double spaced text. Use Arial or Times New Roman font, size 10 – 12. The body of this paper is already formatted to these specifications.
Use the Grammarly tool to check for punctuation and usage errors and make the required corrections. Then read your paper aloud to edit for tone and flow.
JWMI uses the SafeAssign tool to check for plagiarism. A high score indicates a potential problem. Check with your professor about acceptable Safe Assign scores.
While writing your paper, check the Assignment Rubric; all graded topics that you need to address are listed in the rubrics and their weighting is indicated.
For help with Citations and References, see the JWMI Writing Standards Guide, located in the Course Documents menu item in your Blackboard course.
Finalizing your Paper
Your final paper for Part 1 should be 4-5 pages in length. The page count does not include the Cover page at the beginning and the References page at the end. The final paper that you submit for grading should be in black text only with all remaining green text and blue text removed.
This is your Cover Page:
Satya Nadella at Microsoft: Instilling a Growth Mindset Case Study
Assignment 2 Part A: Analyzing the Case
Write Your Name here
Jack Welch Management Institute
JWI 510: Leadership in the 21st Century
Write Your Professor’s Name here
Write the Date here
How to Get Started:
Use the bolded black section and sub-section titles below to organize your paper. For each section, read the notes in green, which explains what to cover in that section. Then delete the green notes and write your content for that section in regular black text. You should mostly write about the case in your own words. Only cite the case study if you borrow specific data or if you quote directly (and briefly) from the case study text.
When you have finished writing your paper, keep the section and sub-section titles in bolded black text as part of your paper and your own content in regular black text. Remember to delete all the green text before submitting your paper.
The Body of Your Paper Starts Here:
Introduction
An Introduction should be short and succinct. Start your Introduction with a brief summary of the paper’s topic – in this case, analyzing the case study about Nadella’s leadership at Microsoft. Next, write a thesis statement, which is the “road map” for your paper – it helps your reader to navigate your work. In your thesis statement, be specific about the major areas you plan to address in your paper. The headings below are helpful, since those identify the topics to be addressed. Write your Introduction after you complete the other sections of your paper. It only needs to be one paragraph in length.
Diagnosis of the Problems at Microsoft
This section corresponds to Section 1 of the Assignment Instructions. It specifically identifies the challenges and dysfunctions that existed when Nadella became CEO of Microsoft and the goals he set, as a change leader, to transform the organization. The suggested length is 1.0 to 1.5 pages for this section.
Under this main heading, write one or two sentences describing the overall topic of this section. Then use the subheadings below to provide more details.
Major Challenges
In this sub-section, write a paragraph identifying the biggest challenges that Nadella faced when he took charge of Microsoft. Be sure to cite specific examples to illustrate these challenges.
Areas of Dysfunction
In this sub-section, write a paragraph describing which of Lencioni’s five (5) areas of dysfunction were most present in the teams at Microsoft. When you refer to Lencioni’s ideas, you may paraphrase the concept in your own words or you may use brief direct quotation. In either case, be sure to cite your source.
Goals for Transformation
In this sub-section, write a paragraph describing the goals Nadella set for transforming Microsoft. Be sure to link each goal to the challenge(s) it is designed to address. Write about Nadella’s goals in your own words, to illustrate your understanding of Nadella’s plans for the organization.
Nadella as a Change Leader
This section corresponds to Section 2 of the Assignment Instructions. It analyzes Nadella’s leadership style and describes the steps and actions he took as a change leader for Microsoft. The suggested length is 1.0 to 1.5 pages for this section.
Under this main heading, write one or two sentences describing the overall topic of this section. Then use the subheadings below to provide more details.
Leadership Style
In this sub-section, draw on Daniel Goleman’s “Leadership that Gets Results” (from Week 3). In the light of Goleman’s ideas, write a paragraph discussing which of Goleman’s leadership styles most closely matches Nadella’s demonstrated behaviors. . Explain your choice.
Rules of Leadership
In this sub-section, write a paragraph discussion which of Jack’s “8 Rules of Leadership” are most evident in Nadella’s initiatives. Explain using specific examples from the case to support your response.
Improving Teamwork
In this sub-section, write a paragraph explaining how in terms of company culture did Nadella chang systems and processes at Microsoft to improve teamwork. Refer to specific examples from the case.
Growth Mindset
In this sub-section, define what Nadella means by the term: “growth mindset”. Describe how Nadella worked to foster a “growth mindset” at Microsoft. Refer to specific examples from the case.
Assessment of Nadella’s Effectiveness
This section corresponds to Section 3 of the Assignment Instructions. It evaluates Nadella’s change efforts, proposes metrics to measure the change, discusses how to sustain the wins achieved, and identifies probable future challenges. The suggested length is 1.0 to 1.5 pages for this section.
Under this main heading, write one or two sentences describing the overall topic of this section. Then use the subheadings below to provide more details.
Metrics to Measure Success
In this sub-section, discuss what metrics could be used to evaluate the success of Nadella’s change efforts. Why would these metrics be effective?
Sustaining Wins
In this sub-section, explain what else Nadella and his team can do to sustain the wins achieved so far. For example, how can they combat the tendency of people to return to the old, familiar ways of doing business?
Future Challenges
In this sub-section, describe any additional challenges that you expect Nadella will face, as he continues with his plans to strengthen Microsoft’s organizational culture and operations. Relate your prediction to the culture at Microsoft, as described in the case study.
Conclusion
Write a short conclusion to summarize your main findings and key points. State clearly how you have analyzed the case study and explored Nadella’s experience as the new CEO at Microsoft. Like the Introduction, write this after you complete the other sections of your paper. It only needs to be one paragraph in length. This is not a graded part of your rubric but it wraps up your paper and allows your reader to remember the main points you have made.
____________________________________________________________________
Finish Your Paper: Add a References (or Sources) page:
The Conclusion is the last section of the body of your paper. After this, you will add a References (or Sources) page. See the last page of this document for a sample References page.
Read the section below, on pages 7 and 8, for instructions on how to cite your reference materials and sources within the body of your paper, as well as examples of paraphrasing and direct quotation.
How to Cite Your Sources
In-Text Citations
Within the body of your paper, when concepts from specific sources are used, a citation with the author’s last name and the number of the citation in your References list is required: e.g., (Welch, 1). This is called an in-text citation. See below for two examples:
“Leadership is about helping other people grow and succeed” (Welch, 1).
In this example, notice the placement of quotation marks, cited text, and the period after the citation. The number 1 corresponds to the first entry on our References page.
When the reader looks at the References page, they should see the Welch book listed as source number one (1). It is number 1 because it is the first source used in the paper, and throughout the paper this source will continue to be referred to as (1).
If the next source you use in your paper is Goleman, then your citation is (Goleman, 2). If you then refer to Jack’s ideas again later in the paper, he remains (Welch, 1) because it is the first source used in the paper, and throughout the paper this source will continue to be referred to as (1).
Teams can benefit from a tool called a team charter, used to plan for a project (JWI510, 5).
In this example, the concept is paraphrased (restated on other words), so quotation marks are not needed. The five (5) indicates the number of this source in our References. If I go to the References page, I see that source 5 is a lecture and it lists the week and title of the lecture.
Linking Citations with your References (or Sources) Page
At the end of your paper, include a page with a list of all your sources. You may refer to this page as either your “References” or “Sources” page. It must include an entry for every source that you have cited or quoted in your paper.
The format of the references list varies by source type. There are examples of different source types in the sample References page at the end of this document. You may also refer to the JWMI Writing Standards Guide, located in the Course Documents menu item in your Blackboard course.
Quotations
Originality is an important aspect of graduate writing. To ensure original thinking and avoid plagiarism, you should keep direct quotation to a minimum. Generally, keep your quotes to 25 words or less, and no more than 1-2 sentences. See below for an example of a direct quotation:
“Leadership is about helping other people grow and succeed” (Welch, 1).
In this example, notice the placement of quotation marks, the cited text, the citation written as (Welch, 1), and the period after the citation. The number 1 corresponds to the first entry on our References page.
Paraphrasing
When you paraphrase, you put the information from another writer in your own words. This is much preferable to quoting, because it shows your understanding of the material. In this case, use in-text citation, but no quotation marks are required. See below for an example of paraphrasing:
In his Rule #3, Welch says that strong leaders display an impression of vitality and confidence (1).
In this example, notice that no quotation marks are needed, since the concept is paraphrased (restated in your own words). The author’s name was used in the sentence, so we do not need to include it again in the parentheses; just include the Reference number, which is (1).
Formatting your References (or Sources) Page
Scroll down to the following page to see a sample References page.
The examples on the References page below are provided as a guide. You may wish to save the sample References page for future use, as it provides the format for several different types of source.
To complete your assignment, delete the sample Sources/References list and replace it with the sources that you have actually used in your paper. Remember to number your References in the order of their first use in your paper.
References
Jack Welch. 2005. Winning
Daniel Goleman.2000. Leadership That Gets Results. Harvard Business Review
Patrick Lencioni. 2002. The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable
Purdue Online Writing Lab. n.d. http://owl.purdue.edu/owl/purdue_owl.html
JWI510. Week 4. Lecture. Building High-Performance Teams
Herminia Ibarra, Aneeta Rattan & Anna Johnston. June 2018. Satya Nadela at Microsoft: Instilling a growth mindset. London Business School
Student’s First Name Student’s Last Name. 2021. Everything DiSC Workplace. http://blackboard.strayer.edu
JWI510. Week 5. EOP Video. Jack Welch
Brent Gleeson. May 31, 2018. 7 Mindsets Necessary for Successful Leadership Development. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/brentgleeson/2018/05/31/7-mindsets-necessary-for-successful-leadership-development/#683c852650d3
JWI510. Week 3. Video. Jim McNerney. Characteristics of Successful Leaders
JWMI Policy & Procedures Guide. This is the policy at my office.
© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This course guide is subject to change based on the needs of the class.
JWI 510 – Assignment 2, Part A Template (1212) Page 1 of 4
© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This course guide is subject to change based on the needs of the class.
JWI 510 – Assignment 2, Part A Template (1208) Page 1 of 13
Discrimination in Employment Law Module Outline Module description Welcome to Discrimination in
Discrimination in Employment Law
Module Outline
Module description
Welcome to Discrimination in Employment Law
This module covers the fascinating, controversial, and continuously developing area of discrimination law, focussing specifically on its application in the workplace.
It is a 15 credit LLM module run in the second semester, and is delivered by 6 hours of lectures, and 4 x 90-minute workshops.
The module largely focusses on the domestic protections against discrimination at work contained in the Equality Act 2010. Issues that are covered include:
The social context and theoretical underpinnings of non-discrimination law
The relationship between domestic and international anti-discrimination instruments
The scope of domestic protections against discrimination (who is protected)
Protections against direct and indirect discrimination and harassment
Positive action and its justification
The problem of algorithmic discrimination
I do hope you enjoy the course and look forward to meeting you all over the next semester!
All the best,
Aims, Objectives and Learning Outcomes
This module aims to:
Provide students with an understanding of the goals and philosophical underpinnings of discrimination law, and an increased awareness of the law’s role in combatting discrimination.
Give students an in-depth understanding of the structure and contents of English discrimination law in the employment context.
Provide an overview of how discrimination law is embedded in international instruments (including human rights documents and EU law) as well as domestic law.
Foster legal research skills, and develop student’s ability to use a range of primary sources and academic literature.
Develop skills of argumentation in written form, the ability to understand and make theory-based arguments about the law, and strengthen critical thinking.
Develop skills of effective teamwork and collaboration.
Following completion of the module students should be able to:
Demonstrate understanding of the fundamental doctrines, key elements and general principles which underpin discrimination law.
Apply principles of discrimination law to concrete sets of facts.
Construct arguments about complex legal problems based upon academic literature and legal doctrine.
Critique and identify problems in the current legal frameworks regulating discrimination.
Present a significant piece of written work in suitable academic form and to a high standard of English.
Reading
The reading list for each workshop will be posted in the relevant folder Blackboard, under the ‘learning materials’ tab.
There is no set textbook for this module. Instead, we use a range of textbooks each week including:
D Cabrelli, Employment Law in Context (OUP, 2020) which is available via law trove.
S Fredman, Discrimination Law, (OUP, 2011)
B Hepple, Equality The Legal Framework (Hart, 2nd 2014)
H Collins et al, Labour Law (CUP, 2019)
You will also be required to read academic articles, case law and policy reports.
Most readings for this module are available via the Resource List link in the Blackboard module that appears on the navigation menu.
Please check this regularly as updates throughout the semester can be made.
Blackboard
Blackboard will be used extensively throughout the module and provides students with lecture/workshop/tutorial handouts, as well as access to the assessments and much more.
Each of the core topics has its own section on Blackboard under the ‘learning materials’ tab, and everything relating to the topic will be posted here.
Lecture slides and reading lists/handouts for the workshops will all be available via Blackboard.
Students should also check Blackboard announcement page for updates on a regular basis.
Communication
Teaching and Learning Methods
The module is taught by 3 x 2-hour lectures, and 4 x 90-minute workshops.
Lectures
Lectures will be taking place in person.
They will be recorded and available through the ‘Encore’ tab on Blackboard.
Workshops
There are four 90-minute workshops in the module. These are on the following topics:
The context and scope of discrimination law
Direct and indirect discrimination
Harassment and positive action
Formative work and assessment preparation
These workshops mostly involve discussions of the reading materials, both in sub-groups and as a whole class. They may also involve working in groups to prepare and deliver presentations.
The reading list and discussion questions for each workshop will be uploaded to Blackboard under the relevant topic folder in the ‘learning materials’ tab.
In order to get the most out of these sessions and be successful in the assessment you must do the reading in advance and come prepared to discuss the workshop questions.
I suggest you begin to prepare for the workshops at least 1 week in advance.
Independent Study
You are all adults who are responsible for your own learning and deciding how best to use your time.
However, you should prioritise attending the lectures on each topic, and reading the textbook and key cases. This is the bare minimum that you need to do to complete the module.
If you have time after completing this work, I suggest you choose some of the articles from the further reading lists to deepen your knowledge and understanding.
Assessments
The module is assessed through a single piece of coursework (max 3000 words), the essay topic(s) will be a current debate related to UK discrimination law.
Students will also have the opportunity to prepare a piece of formative work and get feedback during the final workshop.
More information about the module assessment will be provided in due course.
Feedback
Throughout your period of University study, receiving and absorbing feedback is an important skill for you to learn if you are to succeed.
The way in which feedback is given may differ substantially from the way that it was given in school or college. The University has some generic principles of feedback.
These principles provide the following definition of feedback:
Feedback exists in any process, activity or information that enhances learning by providing students with the opportunity to reflect on their current or recent level of attainment. It can be provided individually or to groups. It can take many forms. It is responsive to the developmental expectations of particular programmes and disciplines. Detailed opportunities for the receipt of feedback by students will therefore vary across the University, and at different stages of students’ programmes.
Feedback will be available in the following ways:
Individual and group level feedback will be given during the workshops
Cohort level feedback will be given following the workshops
Tutor and peer feedback will be given on the formative work
Feedback will be given on the assessed coursework
Individual feedback is available throughout the module by booking a meeting in the tutors’ office hours
Module Feedback
In addition to the many opportunities, you will have through the semester to give and receive feedback, the University and School of Law has an obligation to collect module feedback from students towards the end of the semester.
The feedback is used by the module teaching teams to review the module, as well as being viewed by the Director of Learning and Teaching and Head of School.
Students will be notified when this is available for students to complete.
Page 2