Given the importance of social learning in contributing to violent behavior, we should pay careful attention to the kinds of role models we provide to one another. A powerful source of role models is located in almost every home: the television. Television is the source of more knowledge in the past several decades than any other type of knowledge distributor, such as books and news papers. It is by far the most influential invention of the twentieth century and has established more role models than radio or magazines combined. But to some the role models that are established through the media and television are not upstanding citizens like Ronald Reagan or Larry King, but instead psycopath murderers and serial killers such as David Koresh, Timmothy McVeigh and Charles Manson. Not only are people mesmerized by the media attention that these types of people receive but they are also taken away by the movies that portray the bad guys as tough fighters who can kill people with the snap of a finger. Stars such as Steven Segall, Juan Claude Van Damme, and Sylvester Stallone have done as much to the rise in violence because of the media exposure as the actual killers and murderers.
“Violence seems to be something everybody feels they can recognize when they see it, yet it is difficult to define unambiguously. Many different definitions are now in use, and there is much disagreement about them.(Wober 41)” Violence is at an all time high because of the sales and publicity that it receives from the public. One of the biggest problems in this day and age is the violence in the media and on television. The media has taken the first amendment to an all new level b…
… middle of paper …
…ogress and Implications for the Eighties Vol. 1: Technical Reviews. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. 1982
4. National Institute of Mental Health. Television and behavior: Ten Years of Scientific Progress and Implications for the Eighties Vol. 2: Technical Reviews. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. 1982
5. Pearl, David. Violence and Aggresion: Television at the Crossroads. Society, Vol. 21, No. 6, 1984
6. Rowland, Willard D. The Politics of TV Violence. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications, 1983
7. United States Government. Violence on Television. Report. House of Represenatives. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.
8. Van der Voort, Tom H. Chidren and TV Violence: Perception and Experience. Swets and Zeitlinger, 1982.
9. Wurtzel, Alan. Television Violence and Aggresive Behavior. Et Cetera, June, 1977.
The Right to Privacy in the Information Age
In a day in the life of Joe, an ordinary American, he drives to the office, owrks at a computer, browses in a shop at lunch time, then picks up some milk and a video on the way home, where a pile of junk mail and bills await him. At every stop alo ng the way, his doings can be watched, monitored, tabulated, and sold. On this typical day, Joe, our ordinary American, does not realize how technology has changed his private life. Joe’s driving route may be tracked by a sophisticated traffic system. At work, his employer can listen in to his business conversations on the telephone, and tap into his computer, e-mail, or voice-mail. At the shopping center, the secret closed-circuit camera may seek him out personally. The shop is allowed to put peepho les in the fitting rooms. Some have hidden microphones, too. If he uses his credit card, not only does the card company keep tabs on when, where, and what he buys, it may sell that data to other marketers. A purchase of out-door furniture means catalog s selling barbecue grills, mowing machines, or lawn seed are likely to be piled as junk mail in his mail box. Quickly he sits down at his desk and fills out the Reader’s Digest Sweepstakes Entry form, hoping that this time Ed McMahon will arrive at his door with the big check, so he eagerly supplies personal information which, unknowingly to him, will be sold to other marketers and distributed to databases throughout the world. Joe is unaware of others who, on this typical day in the electronic age, ha ve peered into his private life.
Technology plays a significant part in today’s society. As technology advances, new controversies arise, many involving privacy rights. Medical, workplace, and consumer pri…
… middle of paper …
…per, Michael. “With Success of Cameras, Concerns over Privacy.” New York Times 5
Feb. 1997: B4.
Dowd, Ann Reilly. “Protect Your Privacy.” Money Aug. 1997: 107-108, 112.
Everett-Green, Robert. “Cyberspace.” 1996 Encyclopedia Britannica Book of the Year. 1996.
Goode, Stephen. “Are Privacy Rights Still Inalienable?” Insight Magazine on the News 19
Aug. 1996: 18-19.
Houlder, Vanessa. “The Blessing and Curse of E-mail.” World Press Review June 1997:
Long, Robert Emmet. Rights to Privacy. New York: H.W. Wilson Co., 1997.
“Medical Privacy is Under Attack.” [http://www.ACLU.org] 26 Oct. 1997.
“Workplace in America.” [http://www.ACLU.org] 26 Oct. 1997.
“We Know You’re Reading This.” Economist 10 Feb. 1996: 28.
“William Faulkner: On Privacy.” The Annals of America Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica,