Get help from the best in academic writing.

Negative Effects of Media Violence on Children

Americans have felt a growing uneasiness from the growing problem of youth violence

with teens from the ages of twelve to eighteen. It is a controversial subject that is an

increasingly rising with families and the in the government. Some people believe that the

reason behind this national problem is because families are no longer a united unit and are not

home to take responsibility of watching their children. There are others who believe that it is

the influence of the media and technology. The issue this paper will examine whether youth

violence has risen from unattached parenting or because the lack of censorship and influence of

the media. Through the presentation of documented support, it will be shown the rising rate of

youth violence is the result of the lack of censorship of the media.

According to psychologist Craig Anderson, research shows that violent video games,

films, television, and music in the media increase the probability of violent and aggressive

behavior in long-term and immediate situations within youth (81). In the start of this decade it

was estimated that 46 percent of all homes with children have accesses to at least one

television set, gaming console, a personal computer or both (“Violence and the Media” 267).

However, this percentage has changed and is growing everyday with the advancement in

technology and because it’s easily accessible. The Federal Trade Commission reports that

companies’ media and marketing plans advertise their products targeting media outlets most

likely to reach children under 17. Using outlets such as commercials during the most popular

programs such as South Park, websites such as Mtv.com, and teen hangouts such as pizza

parlors or …

… middle of paper …

…010.

“New Technology and Youth Violence.” Cdc.gov. Usa.gov, n.d. Web. 27 Nov. 2010.

Raspberry, William. “Violence on Television Begets Real Violence.” Times Union [Albany] 4 Feb. 1994,

Three Star ed.: A11. LexisNexis Academic. Web. 1 Dec. 2010.

Spencer, Terry. “Boy’s Murder Defense: Pro Wrestling Made Me Do It.” Charleston Gazette 14 Jan.

2001, sec. A: 5. LexisNexis Academic. Web. 2 Dec. 2010.

Strahota, Hilary. “Facebook Partnership, Tip Line Add to Growing List of Anti-bullying Tools.” States

News Service [Washington] 12 Nov. 2010, sec. B12: n. pag. LexisNexis Academic. Web. 2 Dec.

2010.

Surette, Ray. “Media, Violence, Youth, and Society.” World

We Need Same-sex Marriage Now

We Need Same-sex Marriage Now

Known to some people as a lifetime commitment of devotion, to others a promise to reside with a stranger, and even to some people as a union arranged by their parents, marriage is a widely varying ritual practiced all over the world. In the United States, marriage is a freedom of choice and an act of love, supported with benefits and privileges from the government. It has traditionally been the union of a woman and a man, made with the expectation of permanence and the aim of producing and raising offspring. Tradition, however, is beginning to change. The divorce rate is growing, there is an increase of step-families and single-parent families, and more and more couples are opting not to have children. Along with the rise of women in the work force, the traditional view of marriage is broadening.

In 1967, the United States Supreme Court decided that state bans on interracial marriage were unconstitutional. America decided to leave the choice of a marital partner to the individual, despite the objections from those who believed racial mixing was morally and religiously wrong. Once again our society is faced with the question of leaving the choice of a spouse to the individual. As did the interracial couples of the sixties, the gays and lesbians of America deserve to have the privilege of marriage extended to them.

The tangible benefits of a legal marriage are numerous. Concerning the government, there are joint income tax returns, Social Security benefits for spouses, estate taxes, and issues of jurisprudence and inheritance. Also, many employers offer health insurance, parental leave, and bereavement leave to their married employees. Says David Mixner in Time magazine, ³The issue involves…

… middle of paper …

…children should be encouraged to live in mutual monogamy with one sexual partner in marriage.’ Well, Mr. Hayton, that is exactly what the legalization of same-sex marriage would promote.

Sources

Hartinger, Brent. Homosexual Partners Are Changing the Family. Family in America: Opposing Viewpoints. Wagner, Viqi; Book Editor. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, Inc., 1992.

Hayton, Bradley P. Homosexual Partners Are Undermining the Family. Family in America: Opposing Viewpoints. Wagner, Viqi: Book Editor. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, Inc., 1992.

Mixner, David. No One Has to Send a Gift. Time. December 16, 1996. p. 45.

Schulenburg, Joy. Gay Parenting. Garden City: Anchor Books, 1985.

Should Gay Marriage Be Legal? U.S. News and World Report. June 3, 1996. p. 31.

Williams, Walter L. Benefits for Nonhomophobic Societies. Boston: Beacon Press, 1992.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.