Love is a blanket of bright and colorful flowers that covers a beautifully rolling meadow on a breezy summer day. Similar metaphorical images appear in many famous poems including Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 73.” The metaphor is the most basic device poets use to convey meanings beyond literal speech (Guth 473).
Shakespeare’s use of metaphors in this sonnet conveys his theme of the inescapable aging process. Shakespeare “establishes and extends a metaphor that illuminates the poem’s central meaning” and compares the inevitability of old age to three different aspects of nature (Prather). Similarly all the metaphorical quatrains begin with either the phrase “thou mayest in me behold” or “In me thou seest” (Shakespeare 1-5). These phrases reveal the author’s awareness of the natural process occurring within his body and he compares this aging process to the three natural occurrences of nature including the seasonal change to autumn, a sunset, and a slowly perishing fire.
Shakespeare metaphorically relates his timely aging to the seasonal change into autumn. The first four lines of his poem read “That time of year thou mayst in me behold / When yellow leaves, or none, or few, do hang / Upon those boughs which shake against the cold, / Bare ruined choirs, where late the sweet birds sang” (Shakespeare 1-4). Shakespeare compares aging and the approach of death to the coming and setting in of autumn. Guth and Rico explain that Shakespeare uses the metaphor of autumn to describe the “approaching of old age as the late autumn of the speaker’s life” (568). He gives his readers the image of the last of the yellow leaves clinging to the bare branches much like humans who cling to their …
… middle of paper …
…s thou perceivest, which makes thy love more strong, / To love that well which thou must leave ere long [before long] (Shakespeare 13-14). Through these last two lines, Shakespeare conveys to his readers the importance of holding on to life and love while it exists for one day it will cease to be.
Works Cited
Guth, Hans P. and Gabriele L. Rico, eds. Discovering Literature: Stories, Poems, Plays. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997, 473.
Prather, William. “Essay Topics.” 1 April 1999. Online Posting. English 1102: Discovering Literature On-Line Spring 1999 Syllabus. 6 April 1999.
http://parallel.park.uga.edu/~wprather/teaching/1102OL/essfour02.html.
Shakespeare, William. “Sonnet 73.” Discovering Literature: Stories, Poems, Plays. Ed. Hans P. Guth and Gabriele L. Rico. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 568-569.
The Actual Meaning of My Papa’s Waltz by Theodore Roethke
The Actual Meaning of “My Papa’s Waltz” by Theodore Roethke
Poetry is made to express the feelings, thoughts, and emotions of the poet. The reader can interpret the poem however they see fit. Critics are undecided about the theme of Theodore Roethke’s “My Papa’s Waltz.” Some people believe that the poem is one of a happy exchange between a father and son. The more convincing interpretation is that it has a hidden message of parental abuse. Careful analysis of the keywords and each individual stanza back up this theory of child abuse by a violent and drunken father.
The word that is key to the poem is romp. Roethke states that “we romped until the pans / slid from the kitchen shelf” (5-6). The word is usually associated with happy, boisterous, and energetic running around or dancing. A second definition is rough, lively play. Alcohol would cause a person to act in such a harsh manner. In athletics, a romp is an easy victory over an easy opponent. This means one side is clearly superior and beats the competition with fury and ease. The father could be viewed as a dominating and overpowering force to a small child. The younger son could not possible fight back to his bigger father especially with the added influence of liquor. Further reading of the poem will back up that meaning of the poem is to illustrate parental abuse.
The first stanza sets the scene with clear imagery. The father appears to be in a heavily drunken state because the son can smell the “whiskey on your breath” (1). The reader knows the drinking is excessive because it almost made the boy dizzy. Clearly, the father is in a heavenly drunken state because someone else is feeling the effects of his drinking. Critics will ague that the son was enjoying …
… middle of paper …
… is a happy time between a father and his child. Through careful reading, that interpretation is not valid. In 1948, actions such as this may have been a part of life. Maybe that is why Roethke wrote the poem this way because the event was probably happening in many households and people then could identify with this. Because of the vivid imagery, the reader can feel the boy’s pain and fear of his father. In this case, the waltz is not a bonding time between a father and his son. People now would identify with the son and find a hatred for the father because of the mental and physical toll this could have on a child. The father does his dance by “waltzing” all over his son.
Works Cited
Roethke, Theodore. “My Papa’s Waltz.” Discovering Literature: Stories, Poems, Plays. Ed. Hans P. Guth and Gabriel L. Rico. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997, 536.