Choose a workplace organization (the one you’re employed with or perhaps one you would like to work for) and review their policies on embracing diversity. A good place to research this information is on a company’s human resources page. You can also look at some public information data for an organization on the Glass Door (Links to an external site.) website. If your organization is a public organization (college, university, government employment agency, or nonprofit), that information will be public and on the organization’s website.
• For this assignment, you should focus on race and ethnicity, because this Module deals with race and ethnicity, but note also that diversity includes ability, age, religion, gender, sexuality, etc.
• Consider how this event might help the organization’s staff use their creativity and awareness to imagine a community which truly values diversity.
• Brainstorm what this community would be like if they had an environment that truly valued racial and ethnic diversity, based on the research you conducted.
• Feel free to explore different sorts of diversity activities listed on the Internet, but you must come up with your own activity.
• Conduct research using scholarly sources to review Affirmative Action policies regarding education and employment as well as making sure you have done all of the reading for this week before completing your assignment.
• Write a 5-page paper or about 1500 words, not including the title and reference pages, which are required. Be sure to incorporate a clear explanation of your proposed activity in the body of your paper, with detail, context, and analysis. This is important.
• Your paper must be properly cited and formatted
• Include a formal References page. This is an individual paper; however, you should reflect on our Discussion Forums and incorporate ideas from there as appropriate.
• You must support your analysis with at least three scholarly references and can include resources from this course. Sources such as Wikipedia, USA Today, Fox News, or MSNBC news will not be accepted
Uranium Uranium is a radioactive silvery metallic chemical element in the periodic
Uranium is a radioactive silvery metallic chemical element in the periodic table and has an atomic number of 92. Its chemical symbol is U and it has 92 protons and 92electrons, with six being valence electrons. Of all of the naturally occurring elements, uranium is known to have the highest atomic weight.
Uranium was first discovered by German chemist Martin Heinrich Klaproth in 1789 while analyzing mineral pitchblende (a mix of uranium oxides) samples from the Joachimsthal silver mines in the former Bohemian kingdom (present-day Czech Republic). He named it ‘Uran’ after the planet Uranus.
For many years before the realization of the radioactive properties of uranium, was primarily utilized as a colorant for ceramic glazes and for tinting in early photography. However, in 1866 its radioactive properties were identified but were not utilized for energy production until the mid-20th century. Today, uranium is sourced and used in the powering of commercial nuclear reactors that produce electricity and for the production of isotopes used for medical, industrial, and military defense purposes to power nuclear submarines and nuclear weapons. Naturally occurring uranium comprises 99% uranium-238 and only 1% of uranium-235whichis the only natural occurring fissionable fuel. The uranium fuel used in the nuclear reactors is the enriched uranium-235. The chain reaction is well controlled using neutron absorbents and the resulting heat creates steam which is used to turn turbines generating the electric power.
Depleted uranium (uranium with lower uranium-235 than the naturally occurring uranium) is less radioactive and it is used as ballast for ships, counterweights for aircraft, ammunitions, and amour.
Naturally, uranium occurs in several minerals such as uranite(pitchblende), brannerite, carnotite, phosphate rocks, and monazite sands (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2022). Uranium mines are operational in most countries. However, more than 85% of the world’s uranium is majorly produced in six nations; Kazakhstan, Canada, Australia, Namibia, and Russia.
Using the rules of Logarithms to calculate the k value in the half-life of uranium using the unction: Uranium-235 has a half-life of 703 million years (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2022). Assuming the initial amount was 20, we proceed as follows;
Where N is the remaining amount after half-life and No is the original amount. Thus,
½ = e-k (703,000,000)
0.5= e-k (703,000,000)
ln (0.5) = ln (e-k (703,000,000))
ln (0.5) = -k (703,000,000) * ln e
ln (0.5) = -k (703,000,000) * 1
ln (0.5) = -k (703,000,000)
ln (0.5)/ -703,000,000 = -k (703,000,000)/-703,000,000
ln (0.5)/ -703,000,000 = k
ln 0.5= -0.69314718
-0.69314718/ -703,000,000 = k
k = 9.8598 * 10-10
Using the formula N(t) = Noe-kt and starting with NO = 20, and t = 70,000,000 we get;
Thus; kt= 9.8598 * 10-10 * 70,000,000 =0.0690
kt = 0.0690
N (70,000,000) = 20e-0.0690
e-0.0690 = 0.9333
N (70,000,000) = 20* 0.9333
At t =140,000,000
kt = 9.8598 * 10-10 * 140,000,000 = 0.1380
e-0.138 = 0.8711
N(t) = Noe-kt
N (140000000) = 20 * 0.8711
At t = 210,000,000
kt = 9.8598 * 10-10 * 210,000,000 = 0.2070558
N(t) = Noe-kt
N (140000000) = 20 * 0.81297
At t = 280,000,000
kt = 9.8598 * 10-10 * 280,000,000 = 0.27607
N(t) = Noe-kt
N (140000000) = 20 * 0.75876
At t = 350,000,000
kt = 9.8598 * 10-10 * 350,000,000 = 0.34509
N(t) = Noe-kt
N (140000000) = 20 * 0.708
At t = 420,000,000
kt = 9.8598 * 10-10 * 420,000,000 = 0.4141
N(t) = Noe-kt
N (140000000) = 20 * 0.6609
At t = 490,000,000
kt = 9.8598 * 10-10 * 490,000,000 = 0.4831
N(t) = Noe-kt
N (140000000) = 20 * 0.75876
At t = 560,000,000
kt = 9.8598 * 10-10 * 560,000,000 = 0.5521
N(t) = Noe-kt
N (140000000) = 20 * 0.5757
At t = 630,000,000
kt = 9.8598 * 10-10 * 630,000,000 = 0.6212
e-0.6212 = 0.5373
N(t) = Noe-kt
N (140000000) = 20 * 0.5373
At t = 700,000,000
kt = 9.8598 * 10-10 * 700,000,000 = 0.6902
N(t) = Noe-kt
N (140000000) = 20 * 0.5014
From the graph above the uranium-235 decays at a slower rate taking a lot of time to decay thus the relatively negatively sloping line.
From the graph the curve is always decreasing indicating the decay. Also, the graph has Y-intercept at 20 which is the initial amount of uranium-235 at 0 times of utilization.
The theoretical graph has a Y-intercept (0,20). However, in practice, this is not likely to happen since
Uranium is a very reliable source of electricity as it lasts for a very long time and has negligible carbon emissions and little land footprint. However, it has a bottleneck in that it could be very catastrophic in case of malfunction, and has a very high sunk cost especially while initiating it. Despite these challenges Uranium serves greater good in production of clean energy and in military defense; thus, I am of the opinion that it should continue being utilized effectively.
3 Business Strategies of Halliburton vs. Baker-Hughes Author’s name Institutional affiliation Course
In a 5 page paper, explore a workplace organization and their policies around diversity. Analyze the diversity of the Sociology Assignment Help 3
Business Strategies of Halliburton vs. Baker-Hughes
Business Strategies of Halliburton vs. Baker-Hughes
In 2014, the organization’s investors voted consistently to support a merger with its significant opponent, Baker Hughes. The continuous slump inspired this merge in oil costs and tough opposition on the lookout. It is planned to win Halliburton’s upper hand by wiping out rivalry to take available pioneer Schlumberger Corporation.
The deal will be $35.6 billion of the absolute Baker’s Hughes equity stocks. This paper investigates methodologies used to blend Baker Hughes with Halliburton. It also assesses likely consolidations and obtaining to expand Penn Virginia Oil and Gas Corporation’s investor value. In the subsequent case, this paper investigates and assesses both business and corporate-level techniques of Penn Virginia Oil and Halliburton Oil and Gas Corporation.
Firms may secure related or irrelevant business relying upon their tasks’ ideas. There is no proof to help that obtaining a related business will probably yield a more significant number of profits than securing inconsequential substances.
This issue has evoked hot discussion concerning related and irrelevant organizations. Regardless of conflict on the issue, Singh Mann and Kohli (2008) contend that organizations are spurred to procure others to extend their business sectors, lower creation costs, lessen rivalry, and further develop creation effectiveness. An essential consolidation prompts collaborations regarding cost-saving, creation effectiveness, and upper hand, subsequently making esteem.
Creating value is of strategic significance to the two managers and shareholders. It guarantees an association’s future productivity by lessening rivalry and extra expenses. Hughes is the primary rival of Halliburton, and consolidating the two will make esteem by lessening the contest. The consolidation of Baker Hughes will guarantee that Halliburton Oil Corporation increments deal income by encountering high income from the consolidation. Halliburton directors have been in a situation to distinguish that falling oil costs have impacted many firms in the business.
The ongoing business sector cost, as of seventeenth November 2014, when investors settled on the deal, was Halliburton (HAL) $44.36 and Baker Hughes (BHI) $63.67.Notwithstanding, even though there is a typical capital addition, for the time being, financial backers are worried that the consolidation is as yet misjudged. Moreover, development isn’t ensured considering the 40% drop in oil costs. The OPEC has kept up with its creation, implying that oil costs are supposed to fall from now on.
In this manner, in the future, it will be hard for Baker Hughes and Halliburton to create again from natural gas and drilling. Nonetheless, today, the proposed consolidation will safeguard Halliburton and Baker Hughes by expanding the HAL piece of the pie by 23% of shale boring. Regardless of the collaborations, worldwide powers and unforeseeable dangers will offset the benefits.
Feng, Xiao, Fu Yi, Yuan Lei, and Zhang Yundong. “Construction and Management of Overseas Technological Institutions by International Oilfield Service Companies.” In Oil Forum, vol. 40, no. 5, p. 48. 2021.
Mishra, Shraddha, and Vinay Kumar Nangia. “Corporate mergers, announcement returns and post-merger financial performance: a literature review in the Indian context.” International Journal of Comparative Management 3, no. 4 (2020): 323-336.
Surname2 Student’s Name Professor Course Date Does Hamlet have a tragic flaw?
Does Hamlet have a tragic flaw? If so, name it and write a 2 paper supporting your content
Hamlet’s behavior and personality demonstrate his tragic flaw. His flaw suggests that he is always concerned with tragedy and death, and it is his flaws that lead him into a chaotic world environment and madness. Hamlet’s flaws resulted in the demise of numerous individuals, such as the death of the King of Denmark and his mother. If Hamlet did not have an interest in these flaws of tragedy and death, such deaths would not have happened. This flaw did not exist in Hamlet’s personality, but it was later introduced to him by a ghost. It was the ghost of Hamlet’s father that made him have such flaws, and therefore, the father’s ghost told Hamlet that Claudius killed him, and therefore, he demanded Hamlet revenge for his murder. When Hamlet’s father’s ghost attacked Hamlet by telling him to revenge for murder, it was the starting point for Hamlet where he adopted the flaw and started influencing his life. Hamlet starts to search comprehensively for the truth and puts madness to cover his revenge. Hamlet starts to think about death and gets concerned about it every time. Hamlet’s heart is only filled with death and deception. He has a friend named Horatio who acts as an advisor to him, and his friend is aware of Hamlet’s father’s killing. Therefore, Hamlet trusts his friend’s ideas and strategies. Despite Horatio acting as an advisor to Hamlet, he does not inform Hamlet that he was not on the right track by doing revenge, and there is no way he could change his revenge decision.
Hamlet’s environment is really influenced by his flaw. He goes to the extent of neglecting all significant activities and other responsibilities in his life, which results in other issues. Hamlet neglects his responsibilities to the extent that he forgets about his intimate relationship with Ophelia. Hamlet’s negligence in his relationship with Ophelia really hurts her and makes her run mad. Hamlet hurts Ophelia by neglecting and insulting her. Eventually, due to Hamlet’s flaw, he murders Polonius, the father of Ophelia. This Hamlet’s act makes Ophelia run mad, resulting in her committing suicide. At this point, Hamlet lets go of his objectivity. He does not respect the king nor value his mother’s emotions such that he insults her by calling her a sinner and a whore for being the murderer’s wife. And since Hamlet knows that the king is a murderer, he strategies to expose him by proposing a play where the players act the scenes of King Hamlet’s murder. This Hamlet’s play annoys the new king, and he commences thinking about how to eliminate Hamlet. The new king acquires some of Hamlet’s flaws in death, which is why he plans to get rid of Hamlet. In the play, all the deaths happen because of Hamlet’s interest and actions in death. Hamlet’s act of killing Ophelia’s father makes her think that death is the best solution for Hamlet’s action. The king plans to kill both Hamlet and Laertes. The king poisons Laertes’s weapon, and Hamlet uses the weapon and cuts Laertes and, therefore, kills both the king and Laertes. For Hamlet to die, he was supposed to drink a poisoned glass of wine, but he failed, so his mother drank and died. Later, Hamlet dies out of poison, and Horatio is left alive. Therefore, it is Hamlet’s actions that kill all nobility in Denmark.
Slide 1 The objective of the presentation is to understand various elements
The objective of the presentation is to understand various elements regarding the coverage gap. It will help explain the coverage gap and how it impacts low-income earners in the United States. The presentation will also discuss Medicaid expansion and mention a state that opposes and supports it. Reasons for supporting or opposing the expansion will also be highlighted. Additionally, the presentation will discuss the role that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has in widening or closing the coverage gap. It will also highlight the importance of closing the coverage gap. Finally, it will showcase solutions to closing the coverage gap and how health care equity can help close it.
A state that is highly opposed to Medicaid expansion is Mississippi. A significant reason for the rejection of the expansion is that the state leadership was concerned about whether the government would uphold its promise of paying 90% of the health care costs for people eligible for Medicaid expansion. According to Williams (2018), the Governor of Mississippi, Phil Bryant, went ahead to say that the people in his state needed to eat healthy food, exercise, and live a healthy lifestyle to reduce obesity risk and chronic diseases, hence less need for Medicaid expansion. My state, New York, is one of the many states that have adopted Medicaid expansion.
A significant benefit of Medicaid expansion in New York is that there have been reduced mortalities. According to Broaddus and Aron-Dine (2019), early Medicaid expansion in New York led to a 6% drop in mortality within five years, translating to 3200 fewer deaths among people between 20 and 64. Another benefit is that it has reduced uncompensated care. Before Medicaid expansion, uninsured patients who were too sick were likely to receive an emergency response, leaving hospitals to absorb the expenses if the individuals failed to pay. With the expansion, hospital finance performance has improved. A drawback of the program is that waiting time delays have increased, with more people accessing health care services. Another disadvantage is that the expansion is not available to all people in the state. While Medicaid expansion was meant to cater to people living below the poverty line, some people do not qualify for health coverage. According to Denham and Veazie (2019), the people eligible for Medicaid expansion coverage in New York have incomes up to 138% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). There are still people who are earning below 138% of FPL.
The coverage gap is a problem experienced by states that have not accepted Medicaid expansion, whereby individuals in these states that have incomes below the Federal Poverty Level cannot qualify for Medicaid coverage and Affordable Care Act subsidies. Hence, they cannot get health cover and financial assistance because of poverty. Many states have expanded, with some still left out. According to Rosenbaum and Wilensky (2020), 14 states had not yet adopted the program as of 2020, with some waiting for approvals by their legislatures to expand. States such as Montana, Utah, and Arizona are pending approvals from their legislatures to adopt Medicaid expansion. The expansion is optional for states, requiring them to approve the decision through a legislative process.
There are various reasons for the existence of the coverage. The primary cause is the failure of states to adopt Medicaid expansion. Each state is allowed to decide whether to accept the program or reject it for its reasons, and the people who eventually suffer are the poor people who cannot get health coverage. Another cause of the gap is that the ACA was created to serve the poor and did not include alternative programs for helping them. Some states accepted the expansion, while some rejected it, but there were no alternative solutions for those in opposing regions. A poor economy can also enhance the coverage gap, with people who would qualify for Medicaid failing to meet their economic potential due to financial challenges. For instance, during the Covid 19 pandemic, many people lost their incomes, reducing their eligibility for Medicaid cover and ACA premium subsidies.
The coverage gap reduces the number of people who access quality health care services. In non-expansion states, many poor people may fail to qualify for Medicaid, meaning that they can not access health care services. Additionally, it increases mortality among low-income populations in Medicaid non-expansion states. According to a study, approximately 15,600 older adults died prematurely between 2014 and 2017 due to their states not accepting Medicaid expansion (Broaddus & Aron-Dine, 2019). The premature deaths were more likely caused by the lack of access to health care services than those in states with expansion.
A coverage gap can lead to increased uncompensated costs, making a hospital’s financial performance crumble. This may lead to the closure of health care facilities, affecting many low-income earners, particularly those in Medicaid non-expansion states. Coverage gaps can also lead to poor health outcomes, with some patients preferring to use alternative medicine, which can fail to work. Additionally, other low-income earners can opt to wait for their health situation to worsen to receive emergency care from hospitals. Additionally, the coverage gap leads to increased health disparities in low-income populations. Health care professionals may discriminate against poor people due to a lack of health coverage.
Closing the coverage will significantly improve health insurance coverage for people in the states that do not allow Medicaid expansion. Increased health coverage implies that more people will access health services, improving health outcomes. According to a study, Medicaid expansion enhanced the access to oncology services for cancer patients, improving their health outcomes (Moss et al., 2020). Minority groups are the most disadvantaged regarding the coverage gap, with many living below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). Hence, they experience a lot of challenges accessing health care services. Closing the gap will be significant in providing better health care access to minority ethnic groups and reducing racial health disparities. Additionally, closing the gap will reduce the closure of hospitals in rural areas, where most people are low-income earners. Lack of health care coverage can lead to financial stress in rural hospitals, and they can close.
Failure to provide Medicaid expansion leaves many people uninsured, which impacts hospitals. Closing the coverage gap will reduce uncompensated costs, making them more financially stable. Uncompensated costs strain the hospital’s budget, ensuring there are no significant developments to foster better health care services. According to a study, the ACA’s Medicaid expansion significantly improved hospital financial performance and reduced instances of closure, especially in rural areas where many people were uninsured before the expansion (Lindrooth et al., 2018). Closing the gap also ensures that more people access insurance, reducing the number of uninsured admissions in hospitals. Additionally, it enhances better health care access to people in rural areas, improving health outcomes.
The Build Back Better Act is a solution to closing the coverage gap. The legislation would ensure that people getting incomes below the poverty level would receive full premium subsidies, which would enable them to obtain coverage. This would significantly reduce the coverage gap. Another way to close the gap is by providing financial incentives to states that have already expanded to encourage them to remain that way and influence non-expansion states to join them. For instance, through the American Rescue Plan, which offers additional federal funding to states, non-expansion areas can be influenced to expand to enjoy its benefits. Additionally, partial expansion, such as in Wisconsin, can close the gap. The partial expansion entails covering adults with incomes below the poverty line except those with incomes between 100 percent to 138 percent of the poverty line.
Health equity ensures that people are not disadvantaged in accessing health care services based on various factors such as class, education level, and economic status. Through health equity, legislative bodies would seek to enhance better policies that can offer alternative solutions to poor people who can are not eligible for Medicaid coverage. Additionally, health equity can enhance the creation of policies in various states to increase more people getting health coverage. For instance, policies can be created to advocate for childless adults in various non-expansion states to be eligible for Medicaid coverage.
Williams, B. (2018). The inexorable expansion of Medicaid expansion. N. Ill. UL Rev., 39 (2), 240-272.
Lindrooth, R. C., Perraillon, M. C., Hardy, R. Y., & Tung, G. J. (2018). Understanding the relationship between Medicaid expansions and hospital closures. Health Affairs, 37(1), 111-120.
Broaddus, M., & Aron-Dine, A. (2019). Medicaid expansion has saved at least 19,000 lives, new research finds. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Medicaid Expansion Has Saved at Least 19,000 Lives, New Research Finds | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (cbpp.org)
Denham, A., & Veazie, P. J. (2019). Did Medicaid expansion matter in states with generous Medicaid?. The American Journal of Managed Care, 25(3), 129–134.
Rosenbaum, S., & Wilensky, G. (2020). Closing the Medicaid coverage gap: Options for reform. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 39(3), 514–518. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01463
The United States’ health-care system stands out in comparison to many other
The United States’ health-care system stands out in comparison to many other countries’ because of its high individual expenses. Indeed, according to a 2019 Johns Hopkins study, due to higher prices, the United States spends more on health care than other “developed countries.” In the United States, individuals are responsible for the cost of health insurance, even if their employer subsidizes some of the cost. While many other nations have some form of private insurance, Balber et al. (2022) contend that health care should be considered a fundamental right, not a luxury.
To begin, the price point is critical. While some developed countries have a single universal health care insurance plan – with the government setting or supervising price negotiations – the United States is unique in its dependence on for-profit insurance businesses to pay for both necessary and elective treatment. Marketing, underwriting, administration, and profit account for twenty cents of every dollar. Costs will increase under a system where the government does not negotiate lower rates. Prices will increase in a system that requires profit margins and advertising from for-profit enterprises.
The underlying incentive to make money has a rippling effect, which raises the price of products and services as a result of the increased demand. According to a recent study, insurance companies spend “considerable money” on utilization review, the process by which they determine whether a certain medical service is covered under a specific plan. The goal is to keep consumers from being reimbursed for services for which they assumed insurance coverage.
For the second time, the absurd complexity of health-care delivery in the United States results in expenses of its own. Seniors, veterans, military members, Native Americans, those with end-stage renal failure, those under the age of 16 who live in poverty, those over the age of 16 who live in poverty, and those employed by the federal government are all covered by their own health-care system, according to Reid’s article. These private plans are in addition to the hundreds of other private plans that already exist. All of these solutions are inefficient because they rely on the presence of compilers, intermediaries who prepare and route the bills submitted by physicians via the payment system.
Balber, T., Tran, L., Benčurová, K., Raitanen, J., Egger, G., & Mitterhauser, M. (2022). Experimental Nuclear Medicine Meets Tumor Biology. Pharmaceuticals, 15(2), 227.