Get help from the best in academic writing.

Functionalist Theorizing: Talcott Parsons and Beyond INSTRUCTIONS Read Chapter 3: Talcott Parsons’ Analytical Functionalism and Chapter 5: Efforts to

Functionalist Theorizing: Talcott Parsons and Beyond
INSTRUCTIONS
Read Chapter 3: Talcott Parsons’ Analytical Functionalism and Chapter 5: Efforts to Revitalize Functionalism from CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY by Jonathan H. Turner
View the powerpoint lecture.
Discussion:
Discussion Posts are no less than 500 words. Your discussion post needs to answer the following questions:
1. What is/are the main question(s) addressed by the author(s)?
2. What is the significance of that question for key issues in the field?
3. What are competing answers to that question?
4. What would be a different, valid way of addressing the same question, preferably one you regard as superior? Provide examples.

our Task: Develop an “intake” briefing for a group of software engineers

our Task: Develop an “intake” briefing for a group of software engineers who have been tasked with developing a standard set of security review processes for virtual teams. The purpose of these processes is to ensure that compliance for software security requirements is verified resulting in software applications and software-based products where security is “built in.” The company also intends that these processes be used towards the organization’s achievement of Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) Level 3 — Defined.

Background: Software development is a complex task, especially as technology changes at the speed of light, environments evolve, and more expectations are placed upon vendors who want to be competitive within the software market. Many software development organizations also depend upon virtual teams whose members are geographically dispersed. This complexity also makes implementing and testing security features (for software applications) much more challenging.

Format: This week, the format for your deliverable (posting) will be “Talking Points.” Talking points are presented in outline format and contain the content that you would put on slides in a slide deck. Your outline should include 5 to 7 major points (“slide titles”) followed by 3 to 5 supporting points for each. Remember to put enough information into the talking points that your peer reviewers can understand what you intend to cover in each section of your briefing. Remember to introduce the topic at the beginning, present your analysis, and then close your briefing with an appropriate summary. Include a list of sources (3 or more) which attendees could refer to if they wish to fact check your work.

In your critiques for your peers (2 different students), focus on providing suggestions for strengthening the talking points (added content, refocused content, etc.) Grammar, punctuation, and other writing mechanics will be addressed by your instructor and should not be part of your critique.

Read the scenario of “Exotic Cars Inc.” Based on the information provided

Functionalist Theorizing: Talcott Parsons and Beyond INSTRUCTIONS Read Chapter 3: Talcott Parsons’ Analytical Functionalism and Chapter 5: Efforts to Sociology Assignment Help Read the scenario of “Exotic Cars Inc.” Based on the information provided you need to create:

A Use Case model depicting the functional requirements of the system

A Class diagram of the corresponding structural model

Use APA-style writing as well as examples in the book for your projects

Case Study Scenario

Exotic Cars Inc. (ECI) is a company specializing in sales and maintenance of the exotic cars. The cars that ECI sells come from multiple sources Shipped directly from factories Purchased from private collectors Traded-in by customers of ECI ECI also provides a regular maintenance service of the exotic cars, such as engine tune-up, tire rotation, oil change, etc. You do not have to buy a car from ECI to use its maintenance service; consequently, some owners of the exotic cars purchased elsewhere also use ECI maintenance service. ECI appreciates the continued business of its patrons. Consequently, the company wants to maintain as much information about each valued customer as possible. As a result, ECI diligently records how much money each customer spends on buying cars (more than half have purchased two cars and about third bought three or more), on maintenance service (how much customer spends overall, and per car), and whether or not a customer ever traded a car in. Similarly, ECI maintains detailed data on all the dealers, companies, manufacturers, and other sources that provide the company with needed services, parts, or cars. ECI is not a “backward” organization, but things have been done there pretty much the same way since ECI was founded in 1966. The owners of ECI feel like it is about time not just to move forward, but “leapfrog” the competition. You, along with the members of your team, have been hired by ECI to find a way of dramatically increasing the level of performance of ECI.

Organizational structure of ECI

There are three operational locations of ECI Washington, DC, Richmond, VA, Virginia Beach, VA. The corporate headquarters are located in Charlottesville, VA. Every location has a general manager who is responsible for authorizing/rejecting requests area managers may have. Normally, area managers only handle the issue relevant to their area. For example, sales/trade-in area has its own manager, body shop/repair shop has its own, and service area has its own area manager. Every area manager is authorized to make financial decisions up to $10,000.00. If the amount exceeds the limit of an area manager, then the general manager of that location must authorize it–the general manager has discretion of making financial decisions of up to $100,000.00. If the amount exceeds this number, a request is send to the headquarters, where it is approved or rejected by the VP of the area (e.g., service, sales, and repair). The VP of the area is authorized to make financial decisions of up to $250,000.00. If the request exceeds this amount, it must be addressed by the CEO of ECI.

ENGL 2311 Recommendation Presentation 2 Purpose To present your recommendation to a

ENGL 2311 Recommendation Presentation

2

Purpose

To present your recommendation to a leader of a real company in an industry or field of your choosing.

Assignment

Create the equivalent to a 10- to 15-minute presentation for your UNSOLICITED recommendation to be delivered to a leader of a real company in an industry or field of your choosing. Because our course is online, your presentation should be delivered electronically using easily accessed presentation software: PowerPoint, Keynote, Prezi, Moviemaker, iMovie, or another. (You will need to practice your presentation to determine the appropriate number of slides because presentation length is largely determined by the presenter’s style; however, you are not required to actually present your work, record your voice, etc.)

Your presentation should include the highlights of your report, be visually appealing, and complement your report. Essentially, it should be a shortened version of your long, well-researched and prepared recommendation report.

NOTE: Your presentation should NOT be slides with large blocks of text taken from your report or research. The report and presentation should work together in persuading your audience.

The content of your report should include the following sections (further explained in Chapter 13 and in the class notes): introduction (summary of context and recommendation), scope (what the report covers and why), and discussion (analysis of criteria—the factors used in making the decision), and conclusion (final thoughts and reminder of recommendation).

Audience

Write this for an expert audience. Select a specific leader of a real company in an industry or field of your choosing.

Constraints

You are welcome to include elaboration in the “Notes” of your slides, since you will not actually be delivering your presentation.

Reading Requirements

Notes from class and Chapters 3 and 13

Evaluation Criteria

The grading of this assignment will be based on assignment fulfillment, grammar, punctuation, style, audience analysis, format, thoroughness, quality of research and citations, and organization.