Get help from the best in academic writing.

First, choose an issue in applied ethics that greatly interests you. You may choose any of the following topics

First, choose an issue in applied ethics that greatly interests you. You may choose any of the following topics covered in the assigned readings from our textbooks:

Abortion

Second, based on the ethical theory you defended in Discussion: Compare and Contrast Metaethical Theories, formulate an ethical application on this specific issue in a thread. You are expected to use both textbooks as well as outside academic sources to support your analysis and argument. As you write your thread, consider the following flow for your essay:

Step 1: Briefly summarize what theory you defended in Discussion: Compare and Contrast Metaethical Theories and what applied issue you are addressing in this discussion. If you have changed your mind on which theory from Discussion: Compare and Contrast Metaethical Theories you think is stronger, you may write an application for the theory you NOW think is the stronger theory. For example, if you defended Egoism and now think a Christian ethical theory is stronger, you may apply a Christian ethical theory.

–I will be using Christian Ethical Theory–

Step 2: Articulate a detailed application based on your theory. This should be the bulk of your thread.
Step 3: Briefly describe a strong counterargument to your application and respond to it. For now, keep it brief (no more than one paragraph). In the Capstone Essay Assignment, you will have more room to elaborate.

Objective 1: Excellent Interpersonal skills: This internship will enable me to improve

Objective 1:

Excellent Interpersonal skills:

This internship will enable me to improve and practice my communication skills. At the end of the internship, I will be able to greet guests professionally and make them feel most comfortable during their stay at the hotel. Currently, I have no practical experience in communicating with guests at the hotel. By the end of the internship, I will be able to achieve this objective with 80% of accuracy. I will measure my performance through communication with customers and staff members who would give an honest evaluation.

Objective 2:

Build Work Experience and customer service skills:

Building work experience is important for the growth of my career. It would help me in getting better jobs at top hotels in the hospitality industry. This internship will improve my customer skills. At the end of my internship, I will be able to improve my customer service skills by at least 80%. I will learn customer service skills by working with senior management and through training. I will measure my performance during the internship through practice and small assessments

Objective 3:

Management and money handling skills:

At the end of the internship, I will be able to manage money as well as handle the basic management of the hotel. Managing the basic operations of hotels such as checking the empty rooms, replying to customers on hotel booking websites, and accepting their payments. In person, payments are also handled by the hotel receptionist. I will work with the senior receptionist to learn these skills. Moreover, I will get a chance to get an answer to my questions about money management. Therefore, a combination of practical experience and money collection would enable me to achieve this objective.

Interview Questions for When was your child’s disability initially suspected? Please discuss

First, choose an issue in applied ethics that greatly interests you. You may choose any of the following topics Writing Assignment Help Interview Questions for

When was your child’s disability initially suspected?

Please discuss who brought it to the parents’ attention. If it was the parent who first suspected it, what was the cause for this suspicion?

Please share your experience with the initial testing process. Also be sure to discuss the child’s experience, as well as how it may have changed during additional testing over time.

What was your level of involvement during the IFSP development? Be sure to discuss thoughts on how the process could be changed (if applicable).

Please share with me the various forms of therapy, treatment, and support that you and your child have received over time.  

How would you describe the relationships with the various service providers?  Be sure to include the ability to have your needs understood and met by service providers

Discuss both the joys and frustrations that you have experienced with your child.

How has the fact that your child has a disability affected others in your immediate family? Be sure to focus on the siblings, spouse, grandparents.

How has this experience affected the establishment and maintenance of friendships that the child has had over time?

Running head: Nature Access Program 1 3 Nature Access Program Introduction St.

Running head: Nature Access Program

1

3

Nature Access Program

Introduction

St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children is situated in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. It is a pediatric acute care hospital. The hospice offers an all-inclusive pediatric specialty and subspecialty to pediatric clients from 0 to 21 years of age all through eastern Pennsylvania. It is one of the oldest full-service hospices in the United States entirely devoted to children’s care (St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, 2021). St. Christopher’s Foundation for Children aims to support the well-being and health of children within the society they serve using programs in the field of care, research outreach, and education. The program serves around 2,800 children annually by offering comprehensive and constant oral health care through personal hygiene training and preventive and restorative treatments at no price.

St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children provides health care amenities for minors from delivery up to 21 years of age. Since 1875, the organization has become a great leader in pediatric care (St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, 2021). Its nationwide acknowledged programs and pediatric professionals offer incomparable care to minors from all over the Philadelphia region and across the globe. The goal of the hospital is to afford quality pediatric amenities in a considerate, progressive setting. The hospice is dedicated to quality through collaboration, service, and technology within a child-responsive, family-focused atmosphere. The organization has attained medical firsts in various pediatric fields from organ transplantation to neonatal care through its concurrent roles in medical service, training, and exploration.

Furthermore, St. Christopher’s Foundation for Children offers financing to enhance health results for children within North Philadelphia. Traditionally, the foundation has sponsored programs linked to medical care. With Innovation Fund (IF) support, they executed an equity‐dedicated policy and conservational transformation initiative (St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, 2021). The hospice instituted a joint, low‐income food share package and is exploiting that effort to generate policy change. Because of this work, SCFC has developed to be a more proactive financier that looks to identify society’s needs, inspire partnerships, and generate novel funder‐grantee associations.

The Center applies an interdisciplinary approach to patient care comprising nurses, surgeons, nurse practitioners, doctor’s assistants, social employees, care coordinators, psychologists, dental teams, dieticians, and community health employees. The Center’s interdisciplinary approach and clinical home model permit it to act as a significant intersection to meet its clients’ therapeutic, learning, and behavioral health requirements. There is increasing proof that exposure to nature, as opposed to a built ecology, is linked with enhanced health (Weeland et al., 2019). Explicitly in children, extra exposure to nature appears to relate to enhanced cognitive, emotional, and behavioral self-control (Jimenez et al., 2021). It is not certain that nature does advance children’s physical or psychological well-being, but assertively it might positively influence children’s comprehensive health.

Exposure to natural outdoor backgrounds has been related to several well-being benefits, including enhanced cognitive growth and psychological and physical well-being. Nevertheless, few studies have investigated the influence of children’s exposure to natural surroundings on mental and physical well-being (Weeland et al., 2019). Children, particularly those living within big cities, are experiencing significantly less time in nature, which can bring about a decline in cognitive growth. Numerous studies discovered that exposure to green spaces was associated with enhancements to levels of children’s physical activity —an outcome that might provide benefits to emotional health, considering the long-lasting proof of exercise on psychological health (Jimenez et al., 2021). The most vital welfare on psychological health was witnessed in studies wherein children had experience in green spaces where they reside or attend school. The current research looks to answer the following questions: Are any cities like Philadelphia, cities that have children living in low-income – high crime areas with limited access to safe green spaces, doing anything similar? If yes, to what result? What methods have been used to show an increase in mental wellness in the short and long term? What is the threshold to see a measurable effect?

References

Jimenez, M. P., DeVille, N. V., Elliott, E. G., Schiff, J. E., Wilt, G. E., Hart, J. E., & James, P. (2021). Associations between Nature Exposure and Health: A Review of the Evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094790

St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children. (2021, February 3). Giving.drexel.edu. https://giving.drexel.edu/stories/st_christopher/

Weeland, J., Moens, M. A., Beute, F., Assink, M., Staaks, J. P. C., & Overbeek, G. (2019). A Dose of Nature: Two Three-Level Meta-Analyses of the Beneficial Effects of Environmental Exposure Oo Children’s Self-Regulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101326

Introductory Discussion Board 1 Rubric APHY 102 Criteria Ratings Pts Background Information

Introductory Discussion Board 1 Rubric APHY 102

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Background Information

Discussion post provides the reader with general background information to learn more about the writer. Examples could include: where the writer is from/grew up, what interests them academically, personal interests, and hobbies.

2.0 pts

Full Marks

Detailed description of background and interests.

1.0 pts

Limited

Limited description of background and interests.

0.0 pts

No Marks

No description of background and interests

2.0 pts

Link to Professional Goals

The writer shares how their interests are linked to their academic or professional goals. Examples would include: degree program they are pursuing and why, career aspirations and their plan for achieving them, how this course relates to achievement of goal(s).

2.0 pts

Full Marks

Explains goals in detail and identifies linkages between goals and the course material.

1.0 pts

Limited

Identifies goals but does not link to course material. Or discusses course material but does not link to goals.

0.0 pts

No Marks

No description of goals provided.

2.0 pts

Reply1 – Similarities to Classmate(s)

The writer reads the posts of classmates and then replies back to at least one classmate noting something they share in common.

2.0 pts

Full Marks

Replies in detail and clearly identifies connections or points in common.

1.0 pts

Limited

Limited length of reply lacking connections to self.

0.0 pts

No Marks

No reply to a classmate identifying similarities.

2.0 pts

Reply 2 – Recognition of Classmate(s) Unique Interests

The writer reads the posts of classmates and then replies back to at least one classmate noting something unique/different from their own experiences. Then the writer explains why this intrigues them.

2.0 pts

Full Marks

Replies to classmate clearly identifying the aspect that interests or intrigues them and explains why.

1.0 pts

Limited

Replies to classmate but limited description or does not explain why it interests them.

0.0 pts

No Marks

No reply to classmate identifying a unique point of interest.

2.0 pts

Spelling, Grammar, and Composition

Written posts are free from spelling and grammatical errors. Discussion board posts include proper sentence structure, correct punctuation, and clear organization of thoughts while addressing the question(s).

2.0 pts

Full Marks

Entire post is free from spelling and grammatical errors. Thoughts are well organized and sentence structure is sound.

1.0 pts

Limited

Post contains a few spelling or grammatical errors; Organization of response could be improved.

0.0 pts

No Marks

Multiple errors in spelling or grammar. Poorly organized responses lacking clarity.

2.0 pts

Total Points: 10.0