Tennessee Williams is one of the greatest American playwrights. He was constantly shocking audiences with themes such as homosexuality, drug addictions, and rape. He broke free from taboos on such subjects, paving the way for future playwrights.
Williams wrote about his life. The Glass Menagerie is a very autobiographical play. A Streetcar Named Desire, although meant to a play that anyone can relate to, also contained characters and situations from his life. In both plays, the characters are drawn from his life. This essay will discuss is the similarities between The Glass Menagerie and A Streetcar Named Desire, which have similar characters and themes throughout them.
A Streetcar Named Desire takes place in New Orleans. The characters are Blanche Dubois, Stanley Kowalski, Stella Kowalski (Blanche’s sister, Stanley’s wife), and Mitch, a friend of Stanley’s. The play focuses on Blanche and how she falls deeper and deeper into her delusional state, until, finally at the end, a doctor and a nurse take her away.
The Glass Menagerie takes place in St. Louis. The play features the Wingfields. Amanda is the mother and her two children are Tom and Laura. A gentleman caller named Jim O’Connor comes in at the end of the play. This play is basically about Tom’s memories of the last bit of time he was with his family, before leaving them as his father did. Since the play takes place in the memory, it is dark and some things are very exaggerated. Laura is a cripple who is lost in her own world, with no hope of ever finding someone to love her. Amanda is also living in her own world, one where she is still a southern beauty. She feels that if Laura doesn’t marry so…
… middle of paper …
… one in The Glass Menagerie.
Throughout both of these plays run many common themes, often themes from Williams own life. He was a writer who broke taboos and wrote about depraved people, people going crazy and many other themes that weren’t considered appropriate at the time. His own life was very chaotic.
Works Cited A Streetcar Named Desire. By Tennessee Williams. Dir. Scot Whitney. Harlequin Productions, Olympia. September 1998.
2.“Remember Tennessee Williams.” Tom Sullivan. 21 June 2000. http://www.lambda.net/~maximum/williams.html Roudane, Mathew C. Ed. The Cambridge Companion to Tennessee Williams. New York: Cambridge Press, 1997 Williams, Tennessee. “The Glass Menagerie”. Anthology of American Literature: From Realism to the Present. By Tennessee Williams. Ed. McMichael, George et. al. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2000. 1445-
Epic of Beowulf
“Beowulf” is definitely a prime example of outstanding literature. The work itself is an arcane accomplishment that welds the hardened steel of the Viking resilience to the more-contemporary Christian theology. The sheer magnitude of the document is the stuff of legend; inspiring countless stories and still sets off light bulbs the world over. For most purposes, “Beowulf” embodies the ideal for epic poetry; thus making it a staple in the scant catalogue of English epics.
Historically speaking, Beowulf gives the reader a precious look into the lives of a unique culture. Scandinavian tradition was one of brutality and honor. The revered men fought for their status; earning every nick on a blade. We are flung, as the reader, into the archaic world that was Beowulf’s time. An age of pre-chivalric attitudes that were more focused on the individual person rather than the actions of a group. Beowulf was a source of immense pride for the people at the time. He was the strength, the glue that bound Anglo-Saxon culture to their roots. Further, and differently, the notions of Anglo-Saxon traditions we gain from reading the work are immeasurable. As a first-time reader, the images of a great mead hall full bursting with song and celebration was fantastic.
We can attempt to personify with the oppressed people of the various places Beowulf absconds to. Appropriately, he doesn’t abscond, though his actions remind me of a man- a Superman- that could be anywhere and save the world. In that vein, Beowulf is far and away the iconic figure that should typify Anglo-Saxon literature. We are to take away the foundations of the poem from this reading. We are to read the text and graze the surface; as one would grasp the tufts of…
… middle of paper …
…e author takes are a little much. He injects just a little much of his own personal moral dynamic and discards far too much of the actual Scandinavian tradition. There are some aspects of the tradition that we lose, or have to find elsewhere, since it is scrapped from the actual text. Religion, for instance, is strictly Christianity whereas the Anglo-Saxon people at that time in that region would not have known what a Christianity was.
The original tradition, the oral tradition that it was intended for, must have been a true masterpiece. Though like Homer and his writings, we can only speculate as to how great it actually was. The great halls alive with the shrill voices of singers chanting the epic battles of Beowulf enrapt the imagination. The sinew and bare bardic tradition stripped of the Jesus garnish and served with arctic frost and bloodspatter.