PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Cross border management phenomenon college essay help: college essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Cross border management phenomenon
Home Sample Papers Cross border management phenomenon
Published by Emma Watson on November 22, 2019
Categories Tags
Cross border management is a tricky phenomenon for global business, particularly for multinationals with overseas active production operations. I have always held the opinion that the complexity of the cross border management in the operations of multinationals requires a local solution to counter the arising issues. Leading global firms must therefore to live to expectations, and set the pace for dealing with the complexities and complications of human resource management at the global level (Loeww and Molner 1997, p11). Apple as one of the leading global firms was firmly in the lead following the hype around its smartphone launch eagerly waited for towards the end of 2011. A case of specific interest in Apple’s cross-cultural experiences involved the Chinese business production operations for some of Apple’s products. With such corporate characteristics at Apple, human resource management issues of poor working environment remotely featured in the success story. The perception held at the beginning as attached to the success of the electronic producing giant, certainly translated into the best combination of production environment. Despite the possibility of cross cultural management issues emerging for many corporations, initial opinion ranked Apple as a multinational corporation with sufficient resource power to overcome any challenge likely to compromise its image.
In line with the initial human resource perceptions held about Apple production across its overseas operations, modern organizations continued innovation hinges around precision in operations. According to Sydänmaanlakka’s definition of the intelligent organization constructed within the framework of the information age’s accurate operations, competent human resource management is a necessity (Hämäläinen and Saarinen 2008, p132; Hockley, Jansen, Laughner and White 2008, p70). It was therefore easy to expect Apple, modernized information and communication technology experts to observe the intelligent organization model in overseas operations. Among the main postulates that Sydänmaanlakka forwarded is the characteristic of efficient knowledge management and reliance on close-to-perfect human resource motivation for steady productivity. Constructing the type of organization setting that Apple operates in must be formulated not only from the products it deals in but on the corporate standards that such production involves. Perhaps illustrating corporate setting against the background of an intelligent organization cannot leave Apple out of the list, due to perceived competitiveness gained in the recent history.
In dealing with cross-border human resource management issues, the best practices are developed from customized market research. At Apple, continued research and development for product and market competitiveness is among the core strengths that facilitates realization of a unique market positioning. It is therefore expected that before launching overseas presence program, Apple engages in comprehensive research for the entry into the new location. Understanding the recruitment procedures applied in the local setting and upgrading them to internationally acclaimed standards is the best approach that a multinational corporation is expected to embrace. It therefore follows that the global policy of operations employed by Apple in the parent company is expected to be replicated across its subsidiaries across the globe. This is particularly important in maintaining competitiveness status acquired in the initial operations or raising the standards further for constant improvement of productivity. Understanding the employee commitment and motivation parameters assists the human resource management to define the most favorable terms of employment coupled to the applicable working environment. In this regard, the best corporation human management functions have been cut out for delivery of organizational objectives (Bolman and Deal 2003, p35). Availability of information needed to reorganize human resource for the best results in the current corporate practices presents today’s manager with sufficient options to handle productivity issues.
In the setting established for corporate operations in the world, human resource function of the organization is perhaps the most important resource. Managing the human resource in the 21st century is a special role for the management, with the understanding that the productivity of the organization is hinged on the productivity of the human resource (Sims 2002, p46). In dealing with human resource issues, several interventions have been formulated to raise the standards to those of the world around the organization. Meeting human wants from the employment engagement that the employee undertakes becomes a form of motivation, and subsequently influences the productivity and quality of work delivered. Human resource management therefore organizes the environment in which the employees deliver their results to coincide with optimum organizational productivity targets. According to the Maslow’s postulates, human wants determine the commitment invested in an assignment. Maslow’s hierarchy of wants reflects the extent to which employees can make sacrifices to meet various classes of wants, thereby dictating the motivation likely to be cultivated in an employment assignment.
Second Log: Jan 12 to mid Feb (Review and Reflection)
In terms of the initial expectations held about Apple as an American multinational operating in China, cross-cultural human resource management issues were not envisioned. One of the main reasons for such expectations is the premise that exposure to diverse cultural backgrounds in America was sufficient ground for apple to approach international operations from an informed perspective. Alternatively, competitiveness enjoyed by the Apple brand across the globe is likely to attract the best expertise and competence in handling overseas human resource issues. However, as my findings on the research about Apple operations in China confirmed, it is very difficult to forge uniform operation attributes across the diverse cultural settings.
Foxconn production plant for Apple products in Chengdu emerged in the late January to early February news, contrary to earlier beliefs held on Apple’s balanced corporate experience, particularly touching on human resource management. Despite my initial tempting thoughts of the possibility of detaching Foxconn from Apple for purposes of maintaining Apple’s highly regarded position, it emerged that the close partnership presents the two corporations as inseparable parties. Employees working in difficult conditions to an extent that some of them resulted in committing suicide inside the plant presented a different concept of earlier beliefs (Nowak 2012, para.2). Handling employee welfare in such a manner defies the employee motivation and commitment approaches proposed by human resource management insights. It therefore raised many questions regarding the cross-border factors that Apple operations are subjected to in overseas operations.
In terms of the social and civil freedoms that the Chinese society enjoys, it is difficult for the relatively thin space for employees to champion for their rights. Cultural environment under such circumstances therefore spell slender negotiation platform for the workers in fear of action against them. The population figures in the country and the unemployment indices compel the employees to stomach difficult and challenging conditions. Perhaps employing the locally established firm Foxconn was a strategy for Apple to circumvent around cross-cultural difficulties of establishing a new plant in China but it clearly did not work for the welfare of the Chinese worker. It would be possible for Apple to avoid the negative image of its handling of employees if the standards set in the US were implemented without following locally established culture of suppressing employee protests.
Some of the difficult working environment that Apple employees in Foxconn plant in Chengdu experience includes personal safety and remuneration issues as follows. There is a poor remuneration program against long working hours without proper overtime distinction. Employees have poor living facilities offered to the workers on the company’s living dorms. The plant operations are on compromised personal safety conditions when handling harmful chemical in the plant. Employees complain of standing for entire working shift duration until their limbs swell. In addition, working in explosion vulnerable environment without proper protection is a common challenge for a worker at the plant. Under the employee-welfare-conscious human resource management, the modern corporation is expected to follow the globally acceptable standards of employment setting (Barboza and Duhigg 2012, para.7). This is different from the expectation that every person would attach to Apple’s success.
Related personal work experience
In light of a personal experience in an employment assignment involving a multinational company, issues of employment working conditions emerged. I acquired employment assignment with a British oil producing company working in Africa, creating a cross-cultural diversity environment. The company seniors were of an African origin and the challenge emerged from lack of work holiday, as is the case in Europe. It was important for me to have programmed and paid-for leaves, to facilitate concentration in work after a difficult run of operations in Africa travelling in many countries on official duties. I petitioned the head office in the UK on the issue, which did not please the local management leading to a standoff that made it difficult to continue with the job. I was seemingly wrong to force my wishes in demanding for a holiday, but I was perhaps right in championing for the rights of the rest of the employees. The reason for my push was certainly not on self-centered reasoning and the motivation to have the management accountable for employee’s plight was stronger than obtaining the leave.
In future, it will increasingly be important for multinational corporations to consider the specific needs of the employees without bias of cultural differences. The intelligent organization that is controlled by the prevailing conditions of the information age has a special attention to employee welfare. Human resource management concept increasingly gains momentum to coincide with other production trends that incorporate human attributes to the business process. As an illustration, the modern day production is highly driven by consumer needs and behavior. Consumer research is an important aspect of the marketing front of modern business, making production as responsive to human cues of productivity as possible (Harzing and Ruysseveldt 2004, p123). Alternatively, ensuring that the internal human force presented by the employees does not lose focus of organizational objectives, human resource management will increasingly hold importance to operations.
In terms of the developments of Apple’s handling of the employee welfare case at Foxconn, international outcry on the plight of the Chinese workers has attracted response from Apple. Besides making official statements on the willingness to ensure that every worker at Apple is an important part of the achieved success, Apple has undertaken to investigate the damaging allegations. Employee welfare is certainly going to take a different perspective in the Chinese firm, despite the pressure from the political and demographic variables that make it difficult for business to be at par with the rest of the corporate world.
International human resource management faces scrutiny than ever before with the advent of innovative communication technologies such as the social media platform. While the average Chinese working standards cannot be highly rated in comparison with the western standards, China will remain to be under pressure to adopt business and its culture as the rest of the world dictates. Handling of human resource affairs such as remuneration and safety will equally continue to fall out of corporate jurisdiction into human rights definition as Maslow postulates project.
Third Log: Feb 12 to 1st of March (First Log Reflection)
With time, issues emerged that the Foxconn production plant for Apple in China had issues with working conditions inside the plant. Several suicide cases reported at the plant emerged to reveal grievous working conditions with a skeptical relationships slowly developing in the media. Highlights of the working conditions by the media perhaps reflected the established standards over the years, with a keen following from various sources presenting corporate practices under a watchful eye. Favorable working conditions under human resource management are part of a culture established in the modern standards of corporate practices (Leung and Tjosvold 2003, p22). Flouting employee welfare attracts reaction from within and outside the corporate walls, particularly for the multinational corporations exporting or importing cultural practices.
Using the American standards as the traditional operation environment for Apple, the cultural setting for corporate interaction with human resource was technically exported into the Chinese plant, Foxconn. Understanding the Chinese context of dealing with employee remuneration and right to union representation against the backdrop of welfare issues introduces cross-cultural challenges for the American firm operating in China. Perhaps one of the most powerful contributions to the development of the Foxconn human resource management challenges originated from the different working environment in the two countries (Paik and Vance 2006, p112).
Information and communication technology platform makes it easy for the modern manager to access the best information on human resource practices. Bearing in mind that Apple’s production is at the higher end of technology and innovativeness, access to the information of appropriate human management practices surrounding working conditions is presumed to be not an issue.
References
Barboza, D. & Duhigg, C. (2012) In China, human costs are built into an iPad, The New York Times, [Online] Available from <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all> [Accessed 29 February 2012].
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2003) Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Changing Minds, (2012) Trompenaars four diversity cultures, [Online] Available from <http://changingminds.org/explanations/culture/trompenaars_four_cultures.htm> [Accessed 29 February 2012].
Hämäläinen, R. P., & Saarinen, E. (eds) (2008) Systems Intelligence-A New Lens on Human Engagement and Action, Helsinki, Finland: SAL Helsinki University of Technology
Harzing, A. W. & Ruysseveldt, J. (2004) International Human Recourse Management, London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Hockley, A., Jansen, J., Laughner, M. S. & White, R. (2008) From Teacher to Manager: Managing Language Teaching Organizations, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Leung, K. & Tjosvold, D. (2003) Cross-Cultural Management: Foundations and Future, Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Loeww, G. M. & Molner, D. E., (1997) Global assignments: Seven keys to IHRM, HR Focus, vol. 74, no. 5 pp.11-12
Nowak, P. (2012) Apple’s China factory conditions need perspective, [Online] Available from <http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/31/apples-china-factory-conditions-need-perspective/> [Accessed 29 January 2012].
Paik, Y. & Vance, C. M., (2006). Making a Global Workforce: Challenges and Opportunities in International Human Resource Management, New York, M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
Sims, R., (2002) Organizational Success through Effective Human Resources Management, Westport, Connecticut: Quorum Books.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Managerial Skills And Barriers; The Sainsbury’s Plc free college essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Managerial Skills And Barriers ; The Sainsbury’s Plc
Home Sample Papers Managerial Skills And Barriers ; The Sainsbury’s Plc
Published by Emma Watson on November 22, 2019Categories Tags
Leadership, Managerial Skills And Barriers To Change: The Case Of Sainsbury’s Plc
Introduction
Sainsbury’s is the third largest supermarket chain in the UK listed in the London Stock Exchange Market under the ticker, SBRY. The retail giant occupies about 17 percent share of the local market, Tesco and Asda occupying about 30 percent and 18 percent market share respectively. Sainsbury also forms part of the FTSE 100 Index. Currently, the retail giant employs more than 150,000 workers in its more than 1000 stores comprising of hypermarkets, supermarkets, and convenience stores distributed across major cities in the UK (Sainsbury’s, 2012).
However, the company enjoys market dominance in London as well as in the South East parts of the UK. Sainsbury’s also offers financial services through the Sainsbury’s Bank that it operates jointly with Lloyds Banking Group. Like many other leading retail giants, Sainsbury’s operates an online shopping platform where customers can order goods such as groceries, electronics and clothing.
This report seeks to analyze Sainsbury’s leadership style, the impact of this leadership style, different qualities required by individuals at different levels of the leadership ladder, analyse the managerial skills that are practised in the company, suggest skills that need to be practised for improvement, evaluate how the company can overcome barriers to change, and offer recommendations on how the company can improve. Sainsbury was chosen because of the large number of employees as well as the broad business functions it operates.
Sainsbury’s Leadership Style
In October 2004, Sainsbury’s rolled out a new people-based leadership programme as part of broad efforts to revive the company’s popularity among UK consumers. The pillars of this leadership programme were: individual and group responsibility, wise respect for all, sustainable improvement, simplicity, cost reduction, and quality service (Thompson & Martin, 2005). These are by far people oriented values whose achievability is solely pegged on teamwork – the mentality that true achievement is based on strong love and commitment to organisational goals.
The company believes in team work and accountability – everyone in the organisation is considered important and their input to the organisation is considered of great importance in improving the quality of products the company offers to its customers. To achieve this, the company uses a regular stakeholder feedback system where investors, customers, suppliers, and employees are asked to make their opinions on critical matters such as how best to motivate employees to perform better. The company then uses such feedback to identify solutions for specific problems. In addition, the company holds regular awareness seminars for senior management personnel who then are required to teach their teams to impart the organisational values on the employees (Sainsbury’s, 2012).
This leadership style started from the board level and trickled down to the junior employees. This was essential as it brought in the sense of credibility and participation across the major organisational structures particularly on shop floors where cooperation was deemed a very necessary tool for redeeming the lost image. Employees popularly referred to as “colleagues” were encouraged to improve their understanding on key organisational dynamics and to develop a strong sense of loyalty to the company. Team leaders are constantly trained on the best ways of encouraging colleagues to adopt the set leadership values. New employees especially graduate trainees are taken through two phases of the “people programme” that aims at imparting into them hands-on experience working in core functions such as human resource management, corporate responsibility, and customer service. In addition, new employees are encouraged to listen to the success stories of long-serving colleagues and capitalise on that in building a strong mindset on how they can help the company to succeed. To achieve the best out of new and existing employees, the people programme offers an opportunity for excellent performers to be rewarded in their respective areas of specialisation (Quirk, 2011).
Impacts of this Leadership Style
Before Sainsbury’s adopted the current people-based leadership style, it had been experienced low sales as both Tesco and Asda had successfully cut a significant chunk of the company’s market share. Customer loyalty was at a worst level – at the lowly priced retailers end, Tesco and Asda were the recognised brands while at the upmarket end, Waitrose and Marks & Spencer were the strongest brands. As a matter of fact, there was a strong feeling among industry players that Sainsbury’s had completely lost the focus of what customers wanted and hence its market share was destined for worse levels – Tesco, Asda, Marks & Spencer, and Waitrose were on the course to squeezing out the company from the local market (Blyth, 2007). This was a time characterised by lack of market focus, poor business processes and loss of touch with what had made the company successful in the past.
However, financial results for the years immediately succeeding the introduction of the people-oriented leadership style started to show great improvements – sales volumes arose while profit margins started to grow. As a matter of fact, the company has continued to register a growth in yearly sales and an increase in profits. This is usually more pronounced in stores that practised the new people-oriented people leadership style and less pronounced in stores that did not practice leadership and engagement (Sainsbury’s, 2012).
This programme enhanced employee participation and satisfaction as well as cutting down the employee turnover rates. According to Blyth (2007), the company estimated an increase in employee engagement of about 10 percent only 12 months after the leadership programme was unveiled. The regular seminars involving team leaders increased the opportunity for colleagues to see through the values and behaviours and hence their overall commitment to serve customers and colleagues well. Moreover, the effective use of corporate communication has played a core role in enhancing store floor cooperation among colleagues as employees feel the company is committed to addressing their needs.
On a negative side, this leadership style has cost the company a lot of money in form of consultancy fees, workshop expenses, and wasted hours. This came at a time when the UK market has been experiencing regular financial shocks and consumer with numbers dwindling only to pick up after retail chains have incurred significant financial damage. Almost the same time when Sainsbury’s was implementing this leadership programme, other retail chains were cutting on costs to boost their profit margin and Sainsbury’s must have felt the pain.
Qualities Required by Employees at Different Levels
A large retail chain of Sainsbury’s nature ought to engage the most qualified and motivated workforce. Specifically, the company needs to vet employees in the different levels of the organisation if it will succeed in implementing the people-oriented leadership style described above – all employees need to demonstrate commitment especially in core sections such as the customer service division, operations division, and the colleague division should be manned with persons of high professional and academic abilities.
Generally, there are three broad levels of employees in a large organisation of Sainsbury’s nature – the low level, middle level, and the higher level employees. The low level employees are mostly concerned with the day to day transactions in an organisation, for example, the junior clerk in the colleague division who keep an updated register of employee attendance. On the other hand, the middle level employees are involved in the tactical operations of an organisation, for example, a middle level officer working in the customer service division whose responsibility is to develop new short-term customer retention tactics. The higher level employees partake of the strategic operations of the organisation, for example, the CEO whose responsibilities include making strategic decisions such as commissioning a takeover or even a merger (Thompson & Martin, 2005).
Nevertheless, employees in each of these three levels should demonstrate leadership skills. At Sainsbury’s, low level employees who are actually the executors of the human-based leadership programme should have a clear understanding of core values and behaviours of the leadership style. They should ensure that they are in the right mindset to accord the customers and colleagues the best service there can be. On the other hand, those at the middle level should ensure that they have a clear understanding of the implications of the values and behaviours of the people-oriented leadership so as to be in a position to make wise tactical decisions regarding the direction the company should take in the short term. Lastly, those at the helm should show appreciation to the work done by their juniors and above all should have a fine grasp of the long term needs of the organisations to enable them make wise strategic decisions touching the strategic direction the company should take in the long run (Quirk, 2011).
Managerial Skills Practised in the Organisation
Sainsbury’s believes that its more than 150, 000 colleagues are responsible for day to day service the company offers to its customers. The company understands that colleagues working in stores, distribution channels, depots, and offices are the face of Sainsbury’s and therefore need to be treated well. Using the “A great place to work” slogan, Sainsbury’s is committed to providing the best for its work force (Sainsbury’s, 2012).
In the early 2000s, Sainsbury’s undertook an internal performance evaluation to discover which between management and product delivery structures created more value for its people. The company also wanted to establish areas of variability in its existing management structure especially on how it handles diversity and ethic issues. This led to the realisation that a tangible management structure needed to be established so as to streamline core functions of the organisation – the “investors in people” programme was borne following this realisation. The “investors in people” is a management programme that seeks to identify, recruit, and develop a responsive work force that understands and fulfils customers’ needs.
The company realised that in order to achieve its mission of delivering “an ever improving quality shopping experience for … [its] customers at fair prices … [and exceeding] customer expectations for healthy, safe, fresh and tasty food, making their lives easier every day” it needed to invest in its people (Sainsbury’s, 2012). This entailed a rigorous evaluation process of people’s opinions on what needs to be done for the company to improve its services. Senior managers as well as junior employees across all stores in the UK were interviewed and their opinions analysed. Results showed that the company needed to institute a common management structure that gave colleagues an opportunity to apply their personal initiatives while still working within their respective groups.
This management approach has seen the company achieve several corporate governance accolades, for example, it won the gold accreditation for its efforts in investing in people (Sainsbury’s, 2012). The company believes in finding the most qualified people and treating them well. Part of its vision is to make the lives of its colleagues healthier and better by working within the principles of equality, diversity and fairness as well as communication. This management style also accords colleagues the opportunity to develop their potential and ascend through the career ladder.
Potential Management Skills for Improvement
Sainsbury’s has achieved several accreditations for its investor in people management drive as well as in other corporate management areas. However, the company needs to make improvements on the areas of transitioning from low management positions to top management positions, future planning, and on-the-job training.
In the area of transitioning from low management to top management positions, the company needs to undertake adequate training and development particularly when promoting excellently performing colleagues from low positions to higher positions. On the other hand, the company needs to practice future planning especially on the part of senior managers, who spend most of their time on a “fire fighting” mode and therefore forget to make plans for future events. Future planning is a critical management skill that should be practised by managers in all the three major levels of management in the organisation (Thompson & Martin, 2005).
The company needs to provide on-the-job training for new colleagues or those that are promoted to new positions. Self-starters tend to leave colleagues to learn for themselves simply because they ought to know what to do. The company therefore needs to establish on-the-job training programmes for colleagues who are slow learners.
How Sainsbury Overcomes Barriers of Change
Human beings are naturally against the introduction of changes. At the organization level, employees will show their dislike on new policies especially when they perceive them to be insensitive to their needs and concerns. Sometimes it is not even about a failure to address employees’ needs, but just the natural resentment against changing treasured habits (Thompsons & Martin, 2005). In Sainsbury’s as it is in many other large organisations, long serving employees are not flexible when it comes to embracing changes partly because they lack the prerequisite skills to interact with modern information technology innovations and chiefly because they view changes as aimed at making their skills irrelevant in the organisational processes. There are new employees too who struggle to embrace new changes especially when such changes does not enhance career development quests. For instance, the company had to carry out several costly induction meetings with team leaders before successfully rolling out the current leadership programme.
To overcome these barriers, the company needs to lay a proper plan of action that clearly stipulates what needs to be done, who should do it, and when it should be done. Additionally, the company needs to break down its plan of action into small measurable and manageable bits that encourage colleagues to keep trying – people will perform better when they are allowed to accomplish small goals, each at a time. Lastly, the company needs to encourage colleagues to focus on the right things (Quirk, 2011).
Recommendations
The company should do more in bringing together senior managers for regular leadership and management seminars, perhaps splitting up groups so as to make them understand the messages better. There should be constant learning among senior team leaders so as to ensure critical behaviour changes are communicated down the organisational ladder more effectively. It is very prudent for the company to ensure that those at the top leadership roles have fully bought into the people-oriented leadership style as this will enhance the chances of compliance.
Lastly and like in many other large retail chains, Sainsbury’s should ensure that it puts the needs of its employees as a matter of top priority. A great portion of the company’s workforce is on temporary basis, a thing that erodes employee morale and efficiency. Employees that work on part-time basis may fail to fully commit themselves to the values of the organisation and they may therefore not serve customers well. The company should therefore reduce the number of employees who work on contract basis or even on part-time basis. This can be achieved by changing the employments terms for those working on contract basis or on part-time basis to permanent basis.
Conclusion
Sainsbury’s is the third largest retail chain in the UK. In the later 1990s and early 2000s, the company almost lost its market dominance to Tesco and Asda due to poor leadership and management practices. However by adopting a people-based leadership style and streamlining its management practices, the company revitalised its market share by cutting down Tesco and Asda market share – its sales and profit margin grew substantially, employee engagement was enhanced while employee turnover was reduced. However, the company needs to lay long-term plans of action, improve on-the-job training, encourage senior managers to take regular external training, and put the needs of colleagues as a top priority.
References
Blyth, A. (April 24, 2007). Leadership focus: Leadership brings sweet rewards for Sainsbury’s. Personnel Today. [Online]. Available at: http://www.personneltoday.com/articles/2007/04/24/40229/leadership-focus-leadership-brings-sweet-rewards-for-sainsburys.html/ (accessed June 30, 2012).
Quirk, B. (2011). Re-imagining government: Public leadership and management in challenging times. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
Sainsbury’s PLC (2012). Corporate Responsibility. [Online]. Available at: http://www.j-sainsbury.co.uk/responsibility/our-values/a-great-place-to-work/ (accessed July 1, 2012).
Thompson, J.L. & Martin, F. (2005). Strategic management: Awareness and change. Mason, OH: South Western.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Automated Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) college admission essay help houston tx: college admission essay help houston tx
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Automated Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS)
Home Sample Papers Automated Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS)
Published by Brook Writers on April 24, 2020
Categories Tags
Electronic Submission Process
The automated Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) is a web-based government subcontracting system that allows electronic submission of applications of contracts from potential contractors. The system manages the receiving, revisions, and rejections of submitted applications through the eSRS system. The information received into the system generates reports and analyses of subcontracting data in real-time. The eSRS process assists in creating a green environment by reducing the paperwork submitted (Suchanek and Ostermann, 2012). I addition, it reduces the errors and save applications processing time, allows for electronic signatures, papers are not lost, and it makes the process less time consuming on the subcontractors. The electronic eSRS implemented in October of 2005 requires that the Federal Government contractors use the subcontracting eSRS to submit their requirements except for some Department of Defence (DoD) contracts.
In 2010 the electronic submission process upgraded to a new system called the System for Award Management (SAM). Before the implementation of SAM, contractors require to file an Individual Subcontracting Report (ISR) on a standard form (SF 294). There are at least two requirements that must be met by the company that wants to register to compete for federal government contracts. One, the company must obtain a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number, which is a unique identification number for each physical location of a business, and two, the company must register with the SAM.
Chance of Bid Acceptance
Small company government preference schemes favor a smaller company over a more significant global enterprise that manufactures aircraft. it would be desirable as a smaller company subcontracts come from a larger multinational corporation to satisfy large orders of smaller aircraft parts while performing smaller federal government special subcontracting programs. The HUBZone initiative helps a smaller business by agreeing with the eligibility requirements, giving the town in which the company is based an economic relief and jobs and would support a small firm as the required amount of workers is the veteran disadvantage. The owner of the company would be women of minority descent and, therefore, many opportunities for a small business to compete.
Negotiating During the Contract Award Process
Negotiation is a process used to resolve conflict or differences of opinions at the same time trying to avoid a huge argument, confrontations, and physical altercations without the involvement of legal officials to mediate the negotiation. Negation can only happen with the existence of two or more parties. Pre-negotiation is the first step towards a favorable and equitable outcome during the negotiation.Once the parties involved come up with a clear plan and talking points, they can start the negotiation process. Each partypresents their persuasion points with each side, taking turns to listen before objecting to the opposing team.
A good negotiator of any contract should possess confidence, which is a key to winning what you want in a negotiation. Authority comes from the faith, which is gained by getting all the necessary information and being conversant with our strengths and weaknesses as well as for the competitors. The information on strengths and weaknesses will help us to maximize our capabilities and the shortcomings of the competitors(Beers, 2007). To succeed in the negotiation process; therefore, we need to assess and build our authority.
A prepared negotiation list, starting with facts about the contract they are bidding, for example, the direct and indirect costs for the deal to cover as much information as possible about the government contract. It should also define what costs will be covered by the contractor and by the government. The contractor will be confident in his delivery of wants during negotiations and should have a winning attitude while being respectful and professional during the talks. Contractors should be patient and in control when dealing with the government and display a win-win approach letting the government know that you are more favorableand with the best credentials for the job that will deliver what the government wants and a profitable contract for the contractor.
The value of the most supported client or class of clients to GSA and itseffect
A meeting takes place after completing an audit of the offer to determine the terms and price. If necessary, a letter that clarifies a new data requirement is sent before honoring the agreement. The objective of transactions is to make a discount for your Most Favoured Customer (MFC). A set up of the last form of the offer, which includes rebates or discounts agreed upon at the meeting, is made after arrangements. Based on the given data, the administration recognizes the client allowed for the most massive reimbursement as the most supported client. Generally, this could be the end client class, which usually accepts a smaller markdown than offered to other client classes and is most like the administration in the way it purchases. It is essential when arranging any agreement that incorporates the MFC and the retail client, that the MFC is distinguished, for the retail client is dependent upon the discount offered to the MFC.
Advantages of being a Small Company over Lager Firm (e.g., Boeing)
The federal government encourages small business participation through a preference for small businesses in federal programs. The goal is to give everyone in small business the same opportunity to compete and get federal contracts as large corporate owners (Dana, 2007). The small business acts that the federal government passed was to award the small businesses a fair share of its contracts.
Promoting Techniques used to Market to the Central Government
There are different ways to carry out marketing to the government. One, the Federal Business Opportunities, is a generally known platform for elected acquisitions. This website has government contract doors open to companies. You might be looking for a likelihood of a posted selected contract for up to sixty days within three days. One will see some connections when inserting a possible RFQ / RFP on the website page. Using the www.Fedbizopps.gov website will help us much when searching for government contract opportunities.
Two, the Federal Register (the Federal Government’s official daily paper) is a legal daily paper published by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) every business day. The Federal Register contains Regulations, Proposed Rules, and Public Notices, Executive Orders, Decrees, And Presidential Records for Elected Agenciesthe Federal Register Office of the NARA publishes the Federal Register in conjunction with the Government Printing Office (GPO) for delivery. The Federal Register is disseminated by GPO in print, on microfiche, and the World Wide Web.
Finally, the GSA Schedules are fast, simple, and viable contracting vehicles for customers and merchants alike. GSA creates long-haul government-wide contracts with business organizations to give access to a vast number of business items and administrations at volume rebate valuation, for GSA Schedules. You may order products, materials, resources, and administrations from supervisors at GSA Schedule or via the online shopping and purchasing program at GSA Advantage. Customer loyalty arrangements with pre-approved suppliers and gains from the best-valued customer ranking of GSA Schedules, also referred to as Multiple Award Schedules (MAS) and Federal Supply Schedules (FSS). Customers who request from Schedules receive reserve funds, adaptability and decisions, shorter lead times, transparency, easier managerial expenses control over the acquisition, and reduced inventories.
Reference
BEERS, L. (2007). Employment Contract Negotiation. Pediatric News, 41(2), p.66.
Dana, L. (n.d.). (2007). Handbook of research on ethnic minority entrepreneurship: A Co-Evolutionary view on resource management. Cheltenham.
Suchanek, A. and Ostermann, H. (2012). The Electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD). Drug Information Journal, 46(1), pp.124-139.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Customer Satisfaction at Mashreq bank loan department mba essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Customer Satisfaction at Mashreq bank loan department
Home Sample Papers Customer Satisfaction at Mashreq bank loan department
Published by Brook Writers on April 26, 2020Categories Tags
Table of Contents
Introduction. 3
Company Overview.. 4
Literature Review.. 4
Importance of Customer satisfaction in an Organisation. 4
Loan Products. 5
Methodology. 6
Discussion. 7
Recommendations. 9
Conclusion. 9
Introduction
Mashreq Bank plans to set gauges as the Market pioneer in UAE. It trusts in giving effective, cordial and present-day full-management depending on a gainful premise. The fundamental target of the study is the research of consumer loyalty review of Unsecured Loan clients of Mashreq Bank Limited. Mashreq Bank Ltd has two fundamental divisions of operation—Corporate and Consumer Banking (Williams & Naumann, 2011). Customer banking manages retail managing an account management to clients. Under the Retail Banking Division, I, as an assistant, was working under the Unsecured Loan office. This division primarily gives advances to clients to a wide astypement of purposes. Two primary types of results of the unsecured Loan division are Salary Loans and Quick Loans. These are credits focused to clients for individual needs. The fundamental clients are salaried persons and Businessmen. The Unsecured advance portfolio is continually expanding. Direct Sales Officers of Unsecured Loans are dependably on the rushed to hunt down new clients.
Anyhow an imperative component is that whether with this constantly expanding number of clients, enough concern is being given to the satisfaction level of the clients (Williams & Naumann, 2011). At present, there are a few nearby and remote banks offering comparative advance items as Mashreq Bank. Clients have expanded degree for management level research between contending banks. This report was gone for discovering the level of consumer loyalty of the unsecured advance clients. A specimen of clients of both the Salary and Quick credits were chosen, and they were met via poll. Their reactions were dissected to get the present situation of consumer loyalty in specific viewpoints (Luo, Homburg & Wieseke, 2010). The exploration demonstrated that clients of unsecured credit items these days whine about such matters as expanded interest rates, complex documentation methodology, strict advance qualification criteria, and so forth. At the same time these measures have been taken so as to diminish the likelihood if credit defaulting. What the aftereffect of this research did is it unmistakably pinpointed precisely what elements hamper consumer loyalty if the credit clients. Once distinguished, the components that cause disappointment can be explored, to restore the satisfaction level of the clients. This is greatly critical if MASHREQ Bank Limited needs to keep up business sector initiative in Customer satisfaction.
Company Overview
Mashreq Bank is a head keeping money and monetary management foundation working inside the Middle East. It is a particular organization in that it offers budgetary management identified with purchaser, corporate, and business keeping money, and in addition, progressed monetary management like speculation managing an account. To the populace of the Middle East, Mashreq Bank is one of the chief banks that they get money-related management from (Luo, Homburg & Wieseke, 2010).
Amid the most recent three years, the customer base of Mashreq Bank has become exponentially and the bank has extended the extent of its operations to more current areas inside the Middle East. Inside any bank, there are three center capacities which are showcasing, improvement, and operations, all of which add to driving organizations to achievement (Luo & Bhattacharya, 2006). In Mashreq Bank, we find an unlucky deficiency of exceptional interest in advertising exercises, which is tricky since the bank is working inside the money related center point of the world. Notwithstanding, operation capacities assume a noteworthy part as far as enhancing its management to live up to clients’ desires. This paper will analyze why Mashreq Bank’s operational management are not at standard with worldwide models, and how this circumstance can be moved forward. Initially, the current circumstance will be clarified, and after that commitments of the operation management will be portrayed with a specific end goal to investigate the issues. Taking after, the proper arrangement will be distinguished through making new programming which underpins business process re-designing to take care of these issues.
Literature Review
Importance of Customer satisfaction in an Organisation
“Consumer loyalty is progressively turning into a corporate objective as more organizations take a stab at quality in their item and services”( Homburg, Koschate & Hoyer, 2005). There is an extraordinary rivalry in the business to catch the clients. Accordingly, the worldwide pioneers can’t think contending in the business sector, just with the value figure alone. They understood that consumer loyalty is the most vital element to turn into the business pioneer. The capacity of the firm to stay in the business is important to win clients over rivalry since the client is the establishment of the business. Case in point “The retailer Tesco concentrating on the client, oversaw itself to build its piece of the pie and productivity by turning into the business pioneer in the exceedingly focused and cost-cognizant business sector place”( Fornell, Rust & Dekimpe, 2010Today the clients were more taught and very much educated. They won’t be redirected from their desire. They have extensive variety of alternative to pick the item and management. To attain to the complete satisfaction from item and management the client makes dynamic research between diverse item and management. The client’s desire rises slowly when they start to utilize a superior management. accordingly, the bank have difficulties to keep up the abnormal state of consumer loyalty dependably. The aggressive business sector compels the firm to raise their consumer loyalty dependably.
Loan Products
MASHREQ BANK has the store management for its clients. MASHREQ BANK’s store management are demonstrated in the figure underneath.
Salary Loan
Salary Loan is a completely unsecured advance office offered to the salaried representatives of distinctive corporate bodies, MNCs, Small/Medium Sized neighbourhood organizations and so on taking into account their month to month net pay. This type of credit has diverse highlights and prerequisites which will be examined in subtle element in the resulting sections (Krishnan et al, 2006).
Quick Loan
Quick loan is an individual credit office offered by the retail saving money division to specialists who have sound business records for least 1 years. It is a clean loaning item as in there is no money security (like Govt. Investment funds Certificates or Fixed Deposits and so on) taken against the credit. QL has diverse highlights and prerequisites which will be examined in subtle element in the resulting sections.
Auto Loan
Whether you need to buy a just took the ribbon off new auto or a reconditioned one, MASHREQ Bank Auto Loan is constructed for most extreme pace and productivity. Get your fantasy auto out and about quickly.
Own Home
Own Home is the Home Loan item from Mashreq Bank with a complete arrangement extending with five qualities included FREE management. MASHREQ BANK Home Loan gives individual bank delegate to data hunt till moving into the home. Notwithstanding these there are brilliant benefit consultancies for: Interior, Furniture & Soft Furnishing, Home Appliance, Window Treatment and so forth.
Secured Loan/Overdraft
Mashreq Bank Ltd gives credit against settled stores with the goal that you can address any money crises without the issue to abandon your high return reserve fund
Methodology
The study took a quantitative research approach to get data from the 42 participants for the study. This was done with the use of questionnaires that were administered to the respondents to answer the questions.
Discussion
Customers feel the Mashreq bank are honest and thorough about product presentation
i) Response by the Salary loan Customers
The output of data analysis by SPSS shows the following:
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Strongly Disagree 1 1.0 1.0 1.0
Disagree 0 1.0 1.0 3.0
Neither Agree nor 0 6.0 6.0 10.0
Disagree
Agree 1 11.0 11.0 86.0
Strongly agree 39 78.0 78.0 100.0
Total 42 100.0 100.0
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree nor Di
Agree
Fig 3.7: Customer opinion on the fact
That “The Mashreq bank are honest and thorough about product presentation”
Strongly agree
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
DSPROP 42 1 2 3.61 .822
Valid N 42
Hypothesized Mean 3.00
Z-Score 13.39
Z∞-Critical -1.632
Result Z > Z∞
From the table we see that z-score is far greater than z-critical by a huge margin. So, here we are unable to reject the null hypothesis. So it is found that the SL customers are satisfied with the honesty and product presentation capability of the Mashreq bank.
In order to see whether customers are highly satisfied, it is assumed that if µ≥ 3, customer highly satisfied. Our null and alternative hypotheses are:
Ho : µ≥ 3
H1 : µ< 3
Hypothesized Mean for loan processing within expected time 3.00
Z-Score 2.11
Z∞-Critical (at 0.02 level of significance for left tailed test) -1.632
Result Z > Z∞
The Z score is far greater than Z-critical, and thus we cannot reject Ho. So it is found that SL
Customers are highly satisfied with product presentation capability of the Mashreq bank.
ii) Response by Quick Loan customers
In the same way as all the previous tests,
The output of data analysis by SPSS shows the following:
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
DSPROP 42 1 2 3.76 1.138
Valid N (listwise) 42
Hypothesized Mean 3.00
Z-Score 3.33
Z∞-Critical (at 0.02 level of significance for left tailed test) -1.632
Result Z > Z∞
So, here we are unable to reject the null hypothesis, and thus the alternative hypothesis is rejected. So it is found that the QL customers are satisfied with the product presentation capability of the Mashreq bank.
Recommendations
In order to improve customer satisfaction in the bank there was need to ensure that customers got the best quality of service. Therefore it was wise that the organization adopted quality management tools. The company should adopt Total Quality Management as a system that will change the look of the customer service the employees offer.
Conclusion
From the study, it is clear that the organization has the best customer service. Customers using the bank are satisfied with the quality of service rendered to them. However, the study also shows some loopholes. In order to fill the gaps noted there is need to have a better quality management system. TQM is the adopted tool for the organization.
References
Books
Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. B. (2014). Quality management for organizational excellence. pearson.
Oliver, R. L. (2010). Customer satisfaction. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing.
Oliver, R. L. (2011). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. ME sharpe.
Schneider, B., & Bowen, D. E. (2010). Winning the service game (pp. 31-59). Springer US.
Websites
http://www.which.co.uk/money/bank-accounts/reviews-ns/bank-accounts/best-banks-for-customer-satisfaction/
http://www.theacsi.org/industries/finance-and-insurance/bank
http://www.jdpower.com/zh-hans/node/4486
Journals
Fornell, C., Mithas, S., Morgeson III, F. V., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006). Customer satisfaction and stock prices: High returns, low risk. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 3-14.
Fornell, C., Rust, R. T., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2010). The effect of customer satisfaction on consumer spending growth. Journal of Marketing Research,47(1), 28-35.
Homburg, C., Koschate, N., & Hoyer, W. D. (2005). Do satisfied customers really pay more? A study of the relationship between customer satisfaction and willingness to pay. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 84-96.
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1-18.
Luo, X., Homburg, C., & Wieseke, J. (2010). Customer satisfaction, analyst stock recommendations, and firm value. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1041-1058.
Olorunniwo, F., Hsu, M. K., & Udo, G. J. (2006). Service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in the service factory. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(1), 59-72.
Wang, T., & Ji, P. (2010). Understanding customer needs through quantitative analysis of Kano’s model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 27(2), 173-184.
Williams, P., & Naumann, E. (2011). Customer satisfaction and business performance: a firm-level analysis. Journal of services marketing, 25(1), 20-32.
Yuksel, A., Yuksel, F., & Bilim, Y. (2010). Destination attachment: Effects on customer satisfaction and cognitive, affective and conative loyalty. Tourism Management, 31(2), 274-284.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
American Marketing Association codes of ethics essay help websites
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
American Marketing Association codes of ethics
Home Sample Papers American Marketing Association codes of ethics
Published by Brook Writers on April 28, 2020
Categories Tags
American Marketing Association has created a code of ethics to be embraced by business owners. One of the critical roles of the association is to ensure that ethical values are embraced. It also ensures that connections, together with trust, are built with customers by ensuring that six ethical values are adhered to. The six ethical values are honesty, transparency, fairness, citizenship, and responsibility, which maintain a connection with customers(Gringarten& Fernández, Calienes, 2019).
One of the codes of ethics is honesty; this is one of the greatest codes that every marketer must-have. Marketers should strive to be truthful in all situations and at all times. One of the examples of being honest is that they should offer products of value that they claim in their communication. They should also stay behind products if they fail to deliver their claimed benefits. More so, they should also sell products of the right quantity and avoid counterfeits. The second code of ethics is a responsibility; they need to strive to serve customer’s needs. They need to be responsible by recognizing special commitments to vulnerable market segments such as economically impoverished, children, market illiterate, and others who are substantially disadvantaged(Gringarten& Fernández, Calienes, 2019). Furthermore, they should protect the environment when offering their products.
Another one is fairness; this code states that marketers need to balance the needs of the buyer with the interests of the seller. They need to represent products in a transparent manner in advertising and other forms of communication, which include avoiding misleading, deceptive, and false promotion. They also need to reject manipulations and sales tactics that harm customers’ trust. Also, they need to protect customers’ private information.Lastly, they need to avoid engaging in predatory pricing, bait, and switch tactics or price gouging (Gringarten& Fernández, Calienes, 2019).
Another one is transparency; they ought to disclose price lists and terms of financing.Moreover,they need to communicate clearly with all constituencies. Also, they need to take appropriate action regarding service risk, significantproduct, component substitutions, and other foreseeable risks that could affect customers in the future.
Laws that protect consumers
The United States also have state and federal laws that regulate consumer affairs. The consumer protection laws are managed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Bureau of consumer protection(Howells & Weatherill, 2017). Federal law prohibits advertisements that are misleading and untruthful to consumers. An example of an advert that violates consumers’ rights is that of a food company that claims that the food they manufacture is approved by the FDA that prevent babies from allergies. Where in the real sense, they are not authorized by the FDA, and there is no evidence that they prevent allergies.
Another law is the one that governs warranties. Federal law requires that manufacturers must provide clear terms and conditions of warranties. A manufacturer should provide a warranty that is clear, easy to understand and be readily available when product is purchased (Howells & Weatherill, 2017). Consumers have a right to sue manufacturers who do not fulfill obligations stated in the warranty.Consumer’s laws for customer protection provide a way for the protection of customers to fight against abusive business practices. The laws are meant to hold sellers accountable for the goods and services when they seek to profit by taking advantage of customers’ lack of bargaining power or lack of information.
Organizational practices that protect consumers
When it comes to corporate practices, we have several organizations that are meant to protect consumers from exploitative practices. One of the organizations is the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). One of the roles of this organization is to protect public health by ensuring security,safety,and efficacy and ensure the safety of nations’ food supply(Hoofnagle, 2016).Another organization is the Federal Trade Commission, whose role is to implement provisions of the Federal Trade Commission to prohibit deceptive and unfair practices in commerce. It also controls unfair monopolistic practices. Their role is to investigate the company’spractices; they sue organizations that violate the law and come up with rules to ensure a robust marketplace(Hoofnagle, 2016). They also educate businesses about their responsibilities and rights.
Conclusion
One of the companies that I trust the most is Amazon Company. Amazon is an online company that offers a variety of products. I mostly purchase electronics like Television, woofers, and other electrons. I like it because they provide quality products which match their advertising details. I once purchased electric kettle on receiving; it was faulty on returning it they exchanged for me with a functioning one. I like it because it adheres to its warranty terms and conditions. One of the companies that I lost trust with is Wells Fargo. I was once a member of this bank, but I left it when I came to realize its fraudulent activities. I fear my money getting lost since its management is impoverished. Wells Fargo employees created millions of fake accounts, intending to meet quotas handed down from the top. The bank was also found to have charged over half a million customers for car insurance whom they did not need.
Rebuilding trust
Trust that clients have on the business plays a significant role in the success of every business. Trust lost by customers can have detrimental effects on the company from loss of revenue and loyal customers. Once a customer has lost trust in once business, it is necessary to rebuild it.One way of rebuilding trust is through constant communication. People do not love being in the dark, but they like being informed. Secondly,they need to be honest once again. Being honest will make customers trust your product. Incase customers lost trust due to mischievousactivities; they need to get down and find out the real cause of loss of trust and come up with ways to regain it.
Reference
Gringarten, H., & Fernández-Calienes, R. (2019). Ethical Branding and Marketing: Cases and Lessons. Routledge.
Hoofnagle, C. J. (2016). Federal Trade Commission privacy law and policy. Cambridge University Press.
Howells, G., & Weatherill, S. (2017). Consumer protection law. Routledge.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Benefits of joining two groups professional essay help: professional essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Benefits of joining two groups
Fashion Group International and American Apparel and Footwear Association are some of the professional organizations that could be ideal for fashion marketing(Fabricant, Miller and Stark). Fashion Group International is a non-profit, global organization that has about 5,000 members in the fashion industry, including accessories, apparel, home, and beauty. The American Apparel and Footwear Association, on the other hand, is the trusted pollical voice of the apparel and footwear industry, its management and shareholders, its four million U.S. workers, and its contribution of $361 billion in annual U.S. retail sales. While both associations accommodate several individuals in the fashion industry, including fashion marketing, they seem to have some distinctions between them. For one thing, AAFA represents about 1,000 world popular brands, while FGI has about 5,000 members in the fashion industry.
The most ideal of the two will be the Fashion Group International as it seems to accommodate fashion marketers more. For instance, it aims to help its members be more efficient and effective in their careers. In achieving this, the association provides insights on the trending issues online, in print and online. Even more, it gives access to professionals in the fashion industry who wish to know the influence of fashion in the marketplace. This aspect is very crucial in fashion marketing, considering that fashion marketers should be vigilant with the trends in the market to keep up with the fashion industry. Marketing is all about appealing to the target market through their preferences. Therefore, a professional association that keeps one updated on the trends will be the ideal choice.
Compare and contrast two news stories
For this section of the assignment, I selected two news stories from the Wall Street Journal: Jacob Gallagher’s Will AR Sneaker Apps Change the Way You Buy Nikes?And Ray Smith’s New York Fashion Week Faces Designer Exits, Oscars Competition. Gallagher’s article addresses how Nike has developed the GOAT app, where users can tilt their phones downward to make Air Jordans or Nike Dunks appear on their feet(Gallagher). Smith’s, on the other hand, article, addresses how the New York Fashion Week faces the challenges of sustaining its September’s show energy after top designers decided to exit. Previously, these shows have been using influencer marketing through big names such as Janelle Monae to market its fashion designs.
Well, the similarity in these two articles is that they are in the fashion marketing sector and are advocating for ways to appeal to the consumers. The difference between them is the perspective that they take. For instance, Smith’s article asserts that the wow factor in fashion marketing is the entertainment and presentations in runway shows to attract attention on Instagram and keep the audiences engaged. The aspect created by this article is that of influencer marketing where shows feature numerous musicians. Indeed, other shows like Deveaux feature sangers, dancing models, and a drumline(Smith).
On the other hand, tries appeal to the market using technology. The company makes use of an application to entice customers to use more of its products. I agree that the approach that the company took is quite thoughtful. Nevertheless, both articles provide ideas that could be used by a fashion marketer in the industry.
References
Fabricant, Francine, Jennifer Miller and Debra Stark. Creating Career Success: A Flexible Plan for the World of Work. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2013.
Gallagher, Jacob. Will AR Sneaker Apps Change The Way You Buy Nikes? 3 February 2020. Document. 18 February 2020.
Smith, Ray A. New York Fashion Week Designer Exits, Oscars Competition. 3 February 2020. Document. 18 February 2020.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Untitled academic essay help
Read and watch the lecture resources & materials below early in the week to help you respond to the discussion questions and to complete your assignment(s).
(Note: The citations below are provided for your research convenience. Students should always cross reference the current APA guide for correct styling of citations and references in their academic work.)
Read
Black, B. P. (2017). Chapter 10
Online Materials & Resources
Introduction to Evidence Based Practice [Video file]. (2015, May 26). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZWkh-gpC8U
Introduction to Evidence Based Practice by Molly Montgomery
Hain, D., & Haras, M. S. (2015). Changing nephrology nurses’ beliefs about the value of evidence-based practice and their ability to implement in clinical practice. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 42(6), 563-567.
Neil, H. P. (2015). Nursing liability and evidence-based practice. MedSurg Nursing, 24(5), 10.
QUESTION
What is the staff nurse’s role in evidence-based practice in your organization? How much do you think evidence-based practice is valued by your colleagues on the nursing staff?
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.
APA STYLE 7
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Get professionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Preferred Leadership Style detailed analysis college essay help near me: college essay help near me
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Preferred Leadership Style detailed analysis
Home Sample Papers Preferred Leadership Style detailed analysis
Published by Emma Watson on November 22, 2019
Categories Tags
Preferred Leadership Style
Northouse(2012) describes leadership style as comprising of particular behavior pattern exhibited by an individual whose actions are meant to influence others. He describes both directive and supportive styles. He describes directive style as one where the leader assists team members to attain goals by offering direction, developing methods and goals of evaluation, defining roles, setting time lines, and indicating how they will attain goals. It is a one way method of communication. He contrasts this with the supportive behavior pattern, where the leader seeks to make team members comfortable with themselves, the situation, and their coworkers. It also differs from the directive approachbecause it is a two way communication and involves responses that shows others emotional and social support. He further, explains that supportive behavior involves requiring others to contribute, praising, solving problems, listening, and sharing of personal information. Additionally, he suggests that these supportive behaviors are job related.
Northouse (2012) further classifies leadership styles into four different categories. The most important one in my career is the third style or supporting approach. This leadership style requires a leader to be highly supportive, and to use low directive style. It requires a leader to not only focus on the goals, but to employ supportive behaviors to catalyze employees’ skills that are related to the task in hand. The various supportive behavior needed in this approach includes providing feedback, praising, listening, and asking for input. In this style of leadership subordinates are given more control over day to day decisions, but the leader is always available to solve emerging problems. A leader employing this kind of leadership style is quick enough tooffer social support and recognition to the subordinate.
As a leader in a school environment I find the supportive leadership style more suitable. As a leader in a school one keeps on moving from one school after the other. As a result, it is important that while leading others one ends up inspiring the subordinates to be adept insolving problems and to also give room to others to lead. This way accomplishment as a leader is never lost, but the legacy continues. The supportive leadership style as proposed by the author is, therefore, very applicable in teaching profession and more suitable than the directive style. In addition, teaching profession is about imparting knowledge and in most cases the learner is not someone without any formal knowledge. Therefore, to impart knowledge one requires to use participative methods and since leadership can have an impact on the teaching process it is better to use the supportive method that requires two way communication and participative in nature than to use the other style. Again, teachers regardless of their position are also leaders to others and they require to be socialized in a way that they appreciate that leadership is about motivating other people to bring out the best behaviors that can help them improve on performance. Accordingly, supportive leadership style is the most suitable leadership style in my profession as a teacher.
My Strengths and their use in leadership
One of my strengths is that am a good Listener. This is one attribute that has helped me as a leader to learn quickly the challenges my team members are passing through. In many occasions, those whom am leading have highlighted this behavior as one of the reasons they find it easier to come to me whenever they experience difficulties because they know even with the high demand in the workplace I will find time to listen to them. Listening is an important trait of a school leader becauseas a school leader you deal with many social issues affecting a colleague performance in work. Listening helps such a colleague to explain the reason why their performance is poor and it is through this process that a solution is eventually developed.
Secondly, am also good in solving problems. Majority of complaints or challenges related to performance in the workplace requires problem solving skills. This is also one of the behaviors noted as necessary for a leader who employs a supportive style. Lack of ability to solve problem can be the major reason why schools perform poorly in national level and teachers’ classroom instructions are ineffective. Problem solving helps a teacher to build a cordial relationship with the subordinates and colleagues because they like one’s ability to think through complex situation. As a leader in a school environment problem solving is important because one often deals with complex issues and ability to analysis and think critically can be the difference between success and failures.
Thirdly, am also good at appreciating other people and giving praise. This is another important attribute of a school leader. In order to give motivation to teachers to put more effort in their classroom instructions, they require a leader who recognize them and appreciate them for the effort they have put. Teachers do not require a leader who does not value their contribution and who keeps on reprimanding them whenever they are wrong, but hardly shows them appreciation for what they have done. Similar, students also requires a teacher who appreciates them when they perform well in certain areas. This behavior of appreciating others is the one that makes them to put more effort in their duties to receive similar positive remarks.
Lastly, is that am good in Communication. Northouse (2012) suggests that a supportive leadership style involves asking for input, giving feedback, listening, and praising. These are all attributes that a good communicator should have. It is only if one is good in communication that they can be able to ask others to give them their input. This requires someone who is good in listening to provide the speaker ample time to raise their view. In addition, teaching is about giving feedbacks to subordinates and students as well. A good leader should be able to communicate both positive and negative feedbacks to the subordinates. A leader who cannot communicate negative feedback properly can discourage subordinate leading to poor performance. In school this is a common occurrence, for instance when one has to inform a student that they have performed poorly in a particular subject.
Effect of the course knowledge on my profession and leadership
This course has been particularly helpful to my profession. It has helped me to identify behaviors that determine my leadership style and the way these affects my career. Through undertaking a test on the inventory I have been able to shape my behavior to fit to the kind of leadership style I find suitable for my career. This is by identifying areas of my weakness and working on them to improve in order to get to the desired strengths. This way I have been able to change my behaviors as a leader and to show more concern for my subordinates. It has alos helped me to find satisfaction in my work. This is through finding ways to motivate myself as well as those that are under my influence. It has acted as the eye opener that shows the path to follow in orderto attain the goals of my career. I have also become a better mentor to my subordinates because I know what to say and how to say it.
I find this course more relevant also in helping me to develop my leadership skills in general. As a leader my desire is to transform other people and motivate them to take up leadership position in the future. This course has helped me to identify specific behaviors that can help me accomplish this goal. It has taught me how I can empower others by praising them, listening, giving feedback, helping them to solve problems and asking them to contribute in different situations. This ensures that other people are able to develop and bring out skills that are necessary for a particularsituation or time. It also helps them to have a positive attitude towards their work. I can only attain my leadership goal of motivating others to be the future leaders, if those am influencing develop satisfaction in the current task. This involves makingthem feel motivated to complete their task and it is through this that they can progress through the career ladder.
References
Northouse, P. G. (2012). Leadership theory and practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
emergency department management in healthcare essay help from professional writers: essay help from professional writers
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
emergency department management in healthcare
Home Sample Papers emergency department management in healthcare
Published by Emma Watson on November 22, 2019Categories Tags
The Emergency Department is one of the most fundamental and crucial elements of any healthcare institution. It mainly deals with medical conditions that are extremely severe and mostly severe. In most cases, individuals in these departments have to make decisions in split seconds simply because any delay in decision making is a matter of life and death for the patient, and even the physician’s career and reputation. Unfortunately, there are numerous and massive dilemmas in the making of these decisions.
These dilemmas do not only tag at an individual’s values, but also the ethics that have been put in place as a means of guiding physicians. It is worth noting that, in most cases, individual decisions will be incomplete with the requirements that a patient or his family places on medical practitioners (Rocker & Dunbar, 2000). In such instances, the physician would have to depend or refer to the code of ethics (and personal values) in order to develop or come up with the right decision. This was the case that I encountered in my area of practice.
I have been working at the emergency department in XYZ hospital for the last two years. Needless to say, the emergency department may be one of the most difficult and challenging environments to work, especially considering that little is known pertaining to the patient. The challenge is increased by the anxiety of the patients, most of who are in pain. In essence, the workload is always unpredictable, and decisions have to be made on the feet. Effective physicians have the capacity to meet the challenge and even make the most appropriate decisions pertaining to the diagnosis, as well as the treatment of the patient, even in such circumstances. On the same note, they have to inculcate ethics in the decisions that they make. This environment is characterized by distinctive ethical issues with common ethical issues being significantly more challenging than in other settings, in the healthcare industry. A fundamental comprehension of issues, such as decisions pertaining to advance directives, is necessary as it allows emergency practitioners to offer quality care as needed and deserved by the patients (Rocker & Dunbar, 2000).
One of the most life-changing experiences that I underwent in the emergency department involved a 70-year old man who had had an accident. Prior to the accident, he was significantly healthy. In fact, the accident had occurred as he was repairing his house’s roof, from where he slipped and rolled down to the ground, which was more than 10 feet. The man had been knocked unconscious as the paramedics were informed. However, the paramedics had found him awake, but he was evidently confused. In addition, the Glasgow Coma Scale had a score of 14, which was testament to the stability of his vital signs. Nevertheless, the man was immobilized using a backboard and C-collar, before being brought to the Emergency Department, where I was in charge. Shortly after arriving in the emergency room, the man’s confusion increased, and then he became drowsy. On checking his Glasgow Coma Scale, I noticed that it had gone down to 10 from 14. This raised concerns in me pertaining to the possibility that the patient had a considerable head injury. Obviously, this injury was a threat to his life or could have irreparable damage on the patient. In essence, I arranged for the patient to undergo a CT scan to determine whether the patient indeed had a head injury. However, his wife arrived before I could make considerable arrangements on the patient care. As the emergency physician, I was prepared to undertake intubation on the man. However, on discussing the possibility with the man’s wife, she was upset and made it clear that the man had a living will. According to the wife, the living will had specified that the man would not want to be given any resuscitative interventions in case he was critically ill. These interventions included intubation.
Various ethical considerations arose from this case, especially as to the interpretations given to advance directives. In addition, the case highlighted a number of limitations with which these documents come, especially as far as emergency medical care is concerned. Advance directive refer to statements made by competent people pertaining to the manner or way in which they would like or prefer to undergo medical care in the future (Chitty, 2005). The documents identify the individuals that the patient would want to make decisions pertaining to them. Alternatively, they may give directions pertaining to the care that they would want to receive in case they are rendered incompetent or incapable of speaking for themselves (Rocker & Dunbar, 2000). Ethics that guide emergency physicians pertaining to advance directives are based on the principle that the autonomy of the patient has to be respected (Chitty, 2005). It is worth noting that advance directives are recognized by many countries’ laws, in which case treating an individual against his or her likes and preferences as expressed in the advance directive would be tantamount to treating an individual without his or her consent (Chitty, 2005). Cases of treating an individual against his or her will have always had severe and adverse consequences on the careers of physicians (Rocker & Dunbar, 2000). There was a case where an emergency physician had given a woman a blood transfusion to save her life, even with the knowledge that she had made an advance directive to the effect that she should not be given blood products irrespective of the circumstances (Fowler & American Nurses Association, 2008). The emergency physician was later sued and found guilty, irrespective of the fact that the physician had saved her life.
However, this case seemed different as it was unclear whether the man would have wanted the directive to be applied in all circumstances. There are instances where individuals give instruction directives, without considerations pertaining to the constraints that the directives place on physicians in case the individual gets a potentially reversible but acute event (American Nurses Association, 2010). In cases where the healthcare provider has evidence suggesting that the patient would have preferred to be taken through treatment in such situations, then it would be both ethically and legally imperative that the intervention is carried out irrespective of the converse statement of the advance directive (Fowler & American Nurses Association, 2008). It is always imperative that emergency physicians concentrate on the intention with which the directive was made, rather than its specific instructions. In addition, the instruction directive may be interpreted using information from friends, family members, as well as old charts (American Nurses Association, 2010).
In the scenario presented, I suspected that the old man was thinking of an irreversible process when he was making the advance directive. On questioning the wife, I determined that the man had not expressly discussed the scenario that I had in my hands, rather he had only wanted to avert the possibility of resuscitation in case he got a terminal illness. In essence, I explained to her that the problem may be epidural hematoma or subdural hematoma, which could be reversed with treatment. While she was uncertain about what to do, I explained that the man had a reasonable opportunity to recover if he underwent intubation so as to obtain the CT scan. Further, I pointed out that any delays may worsen the results. Eventually, she agreed, after which the patient underwent intubation and was found with an enormous epidural hematoma, which was evacuated. The old man, to my relief, recovered well. Evidently, the ethical issues pertaining to informed consent, honoring the advance directives of the patient and other ethical issues had been met. I learnt the importance of exploring the possibilities pertaining to the advance directives, and going beyond the specific instructions of the advance directives.
References
American Nurses Association. (2010). Nursing: Scope and standards of practice. Silver Spring, Md: American Nurses Association.
Chitty, K. K. (2005). Professional nursing: Concepts & challenges. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Saunders.
Rocker G & Dunbar S (2000). Withholding or withdrawal of life support: the Canadian Critical Care Society position paper. Journal of Palliative Care
Fowler, M. D. M., & American Nurses Association. (2008). Guide to the code of ethics for nurses: Interpretation and application. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Leadership Influences, Case Study Of Richard Branson my essay help uk
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Leadership Influences, Case Study Of Richard Branson
Home Sample Papers Leadership Influences, Case Study Of Richard Branson
Published by Emma Watson on November 22, 2019Categories Tags
I first learned of Richard Branson at a lonely airport while waiting for a connecting flight to a business seminar. There was a gentleman seated next to me and he had the polished appearance of a senior corporate executive except for the small red book that he was fully immersed in. The red book was titled Losing My Virginity. I actually scowled at him and moved a few seats down the hall with a strong conviction that here was indeed an urgent case of mid-life crisis. However, the next time I saw the red book again was during a presentation at the seminar where everyone in the auditorium was scribbling down quotes from the same book as read by none other than the gentleman I had seen at the airport.
I bought my own copy of Losing My Virginity at the nearest bookshop and read it from cover to cover on my flight back home. I did not fly Virgin Blue but I discovered Richard Branson and got to understand him better through that book which happens to be his autobiography. He has henceforth become my most inspiring legend, a man whose leadership skills and business acumen I strive to emulate in both my professional and personal life. Over the years I have read, watched, and listened to every bit of information about the Virgin Legend, an effort which has been beneficial in improving my leadership skills both at the personal and professional levels.
Richard Branson can best be understood through an analysis of his rags to riches chronicle. He came from a family of three generations of Branson lawyers and pressure was on him to join the legal profession too. However being mildly dyslexic and short sighted, he could not perform well in class. Notably his school headmaster foretold that Branson would either end up as a convict or as a millionaire. Branson surpassed the prediction and went ahead to become a billionaire. Here is a man who started out with high expectations of making GBP 800 from a Christmas tree venture. The tree saplings were however eaten by rabbits.
He went on to try out other entrepreneurial activities with poor results until he found a footing in an alternative school magazine called “Student”. He was only seventeen when his magazine hit a readership circulation of 100,000 readers. He had friends selling the magazines for him at a 50% commission, a practice that companies like Clickbank and Amazon today call affiliate marketing. A true business leader, Branson was doing affiliate marketing in 1970.
Having undergone a difficult schooling process due to dyslexia, Richard Branson applied his entrepreneurial and leadership skills in converting the activism of late 1960’s into an asset through his student newspaper. Those were the days before word processing programs had reached the masses but nevertheless he managed to run a news paper and make a fortune through advertising revenues.
The inception of the Virgin conglomerate came in 1970 after the government eliminated a piece of legislation called Retail Price Maintenance Agreement and allowed small companies like his to run mail order ads. He went ahead and opened a store named Virgin. He later opened a recording studio whose first major success was occasioned by the phenomenal Mike Oldfield’s hit album, Tubular Bells, which sold over five million copies.
Today the Virgin Group has over 200 companies involved in music stores, mobile, internet, airlines and an assortment of hotels, travel, and leisure resorts. Richard Branson’s success might be said to have aided by the 1970 government action in the Retail Price Maintenance laws but in a large part it is the result of his charismatic entrepreneurial and leadership skills.
To better emulate Richard Branson as a leader in business I have asked myself in many occasions why a man who had made a fortune in the music industry would venture into a completely new airlines industry with the British Atlantic Airways in a business agreement that was worth more than his fortune, and at the risk of losing his hard earned wealth? The answer to this question has always been the most inspiring traits of Richard Branson. He did it because he understood that the airlines industry was a consumer driven business no less different from the other activities Virgin was involved in (Branson, 1999).
Richard Branson continues to be an inspiration to many not just because of his pragmatic influence but mainly because he is a person who built an empire from scratch. Like Genghis Khan and Alexander the great, effective leaders are those who built their empires from scratch. Such people exhibit traits like the capacity to take an initiative, to organize and reorganize economic aspects and make these aspects be of economic or social value while accepting risks and failings as potential learning opportunities (Mumford, 1986).
Maxwell and Ziglar (1998) discuss the twenty one laws of leadership which Richard Branson embodies as can be attested by the following leadership characteristics: He was able to build a business at an early age of seventeen years; he was able to influence others like Peter Blake who gave him an interview for his first student newspaper interview; he was able to build his leadership skills gradually from the age of seventeen; and he was able to use his navigational skills in leadership to map out the plans for action for the Virgin Group by diversifying it into 200 companies.
Maxwell and Ziglar (1998) define leadership simply as influence. I have always considered Richard Branson to be a leader because has always been the greatest influence on the kind of a leader I am today. Many are the instances when confronted by particularly difficult situations that I ask myself “What would Richard Branson do when confronted with a similar situation?” Such an inspiration gives me the courage and ability to handle management and leadership issues at a higher and more efficient level.
The way I lead others has been influenced by many other people, professional and family factors, and even some notable events and incidences. For all those many events in my history that have made me be the kind of leader I am today, none is quite as unforgettable and of profound significance as the thirty minute speech I once gave to a dignified audience of the top management and fellow employees of the first company I ever worked for.
I was a junior employee, in fact barely three months old, in the first firm I ever worked for. The only knowledge I had about the way labor unions handled their businesses was the text book materials I learned in school, and of course the Hollywood input from movies. When the management called a meeting for all employees with visiting labor union officials, probably to show the firm’s openness to labor issues, I never expected I would be singled out to speak on behalf of the junior employees.
It happened that whoever was meant to deliver the speech was a known skeptic in the company and for some reason he had decided not to attend the meeting possibly in fear of retribution from the management should he air views the company would have considered harmful to its reputation. Without prior notice, the human resources manager singled me out of crowd of employees I was invited to talk about the firm’s employee and management relationship. I have always believed he did it because I was the least informed employee about the company’s dealings and therefore in a very harmless position for the company. In any case no right thinking new employee would jeopardize his or her employment by speaking ill of the company, or so I believed.
I had always been a nervous wreck ever since I was a child and could not stand before a crowd without developing body tremors and shortage of breath. So after I had timidly stepped on the podium, I could neither talk nor keep the handheld microphone in one spot. There were chuckles and sniggers gradually building within the crowd. I therefore seized the moment and willed myself to stay calm and blurted out: “Ladies and gentlemen, before I go on I would like to make a serious statement first. Today is the first time that I have had the honor of addressing such a dignified crowd. I’m so excited that I can’t help myself so should you perceive my excited hands shaking like tree branches on a windy day, just disregard them and instead give attention to what I have to say today.”
I expected the silly statement to provoke even more laughter and booing but instead they all sat in rapt attention, so much that my entire body ceased to shake and my only worry was what to talk about. The most valuable lesson I learned from this incident was that even at your weakest point in times of adversity, people will listen to you and seek for your guidance as a leader only when you demonstrate to control over your perceived weaknesses to them. They listened to me when I showed that that I was aware of my nervousness but I also had it under control. People will follow even the meekest of leaders when he or she can confidently demonstrate the ability to take control (Bennis, 1989).
The importance of taking time for leaders to identify and analyze the people and events that have been of profound influence in their leadership roles can never be underscored. Bolman and Deal (2008) describe such activities as being part of a symbolic frame that seeks to create a work-place culture. Identifying and describing role models creates an inspirational atmosphere which not only brings a human face in the work-place but also accords purpose and meaning to work, improves relations through exchange of experiences, and above all builds team spirit. Carrying out such activities helps managers to discover the importance of symbolism in management and in improving their organizational structures.
The exchange of ideas about role models is essential in what Bolman and Deal (2008) refer to as the political frame which is about coping with power and conflict, building coalitions and managing both internal and external politics. When leaders are open about where they acquire their leadership inspirations, it makes it easier to understand their expectations and their ambitions.
On a personal level, identifying role models can be quite beneficial both at the personal and professional level. Unlike most people who pursue their careers simply as a way of life, true leaders pursue ambitious life goals. Such goals are set through inspiration which can be derived from many sources. Inspiration can come from people above or even lower than the leader’s level in his or her field. It is their actions and insights that a leader emulates to better his or her self (Burns, 2010).
Hackman and Wageman (2005) describe inspirational events as random incidences of awareness. They make us discover who we truly are and our potential as leaders. Discussing the function such events play in our leadership roles is important in making us aware of the abundant wisdom that surrounds us.
Inspirational activities provoke creativity and imagination which are essential components of skilled leadership. The deficiency of imagination has been “a major cause of the shortfall between reach and grasp of so many organizations – the empty chasm between dreams and reality, between noble aspirations and disappointing results” (Bolman & Deal, 2008, p.17). When managers seek for the source of their inspiration and influence that made them who they are, their creativity and imagination bears down on them to emulate, or even better, their role models through improved organizational structures and performance.
References
Bennis, W. (1989). On becoming a leader. New York: Addison Wesley.
Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (2008) Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Branson, R. (1999). Losing my virginity: How I’ve survived, had fun, and made a fortune doing business my way. London: Crown Business.
Burns, D. (April 2010). Learning lessons from everyday role models. Retrieved August 8, 2010 from http://www.lyved.com/people/learning-lessons-from-everyday-role-models/
Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A Theory of Team Coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269-287.
Maxwell, J. C., & Ziglar, Z. (1998). The 21 irrefutable laws of leadership: Follow them and people will follow you. New York: Thomas Nelson.
Mumford, M. D. (1986). Leadership in the organizational context: Conceptual approach and its application. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16(6), 508-531.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
CSU Wk 3 Infectious Disease how The We Could Have Prevented the Outbreak Discussion essay help writing: essay help writing
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
CSU Wk 3 Infectious Disease how The We Could Have Prevented the Outbreak Discussion
School
California Southern University
Question Description
This week, you will conduct an outbreak investigation of a disease.
You are an epidemiologist for your local health department, and you are conducting an outbreak investigation of the disease you chose for this week’s discussion.
In your role as a health department official, you are interviewing a fictitious patient who has/had this disease. Using research you gathered when completing your discussion assignment, complete this questionnaire with this fictitious patient’s information to determine clues to the outbreak.
Write a 1- to 2-page paper in which you present a hypothesis on how this outbreak could have been prevented. What prevention techniques have you learned about in the course materials and your discussions with your classmates that could have averted this outbreak?
Your paper must be 3–4 pages in length (including the questionnaire). Include evidence or information from at least two credible external sources and follow APA style for formatting and citation.
Your textbook and supplemental reading material may be used as a reference. The APA format for your text is as follows:
Nelson, K. E. (2014). Infectious disease epidemiology (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Principles of epidemiology in public health practice: Self-study course (3rd ed.). Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
PUB610 GCU Week 4 Social Media and Community Engagement Essay easy essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
PUB 610 GCU Week 4 Social Media and Community Engagement Essay
Course
PUB 610
School
Grand Canyon University
Department
PUB
Question Description
IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS:
Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit.
Social media channels are designed to be engaging, but they are often used by public health organizations and practitioners as a means to disseminate mass information, rather than to engage audiences in meaningful interaction. Harnessing social media to best achieve public health outcomes is a topic of much discussion and study in the public health community.
For this assignment, you will analyze public health communication via social media in your community. Follow a public health organization, local or national, on a social media channel (e.g., Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, or other) for at least 3 weeks. In a paper of 1,000-1,250 words, address the following:
Describe the organization you followed and the social media channel you selected. What kind of information is shared on social media by the organization?
To what degree does the organization engage with users/followers (e.g., responding to questions, engaging in conversation, hosting “chats” with experts, soliciting information)?
What improvements or suggestions would you make to this organization regarding its social media and community engagement? Why? Use examples and evidence from the research literature to support your suggestions.
Identify at least two benefits/advantages and two challenges/risks of using social media for public health communication. Use examples and evidence from the research literature to support the benefits and challenges you highlight.
General Requirements
You are required to cite at least SIX sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the discussion question criteria and public health content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.
While APA style is required, solid academic writing is expected as well, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
PLEASE make sure APA citation and permalink for articles are complete and correct.
PLEASE add the links/sites below to the reference list if you use any of these readings and make sure everything is in proper APA format.
https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/quick-guide-on-refe…
Read Chapter 5 in Health Communication: From Theory to Practice.
URL:
http://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/wiley-and-sons/2013/health-communication_from-theory-to-practice_2e.php
Read “Mass Media Campaign to Reduce Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in a Rural Area of the United States,” by Farley, Halper, Carlin, Emmerson, Foster, and Fertig, from American Journal of Public Health (2017).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=123016485&site=eds-live&scope=site
Read “Exposure to the ‘Dark Side of Tanning’ Skin Cancer Prevention Mass Media Campaign and Its Association With Tanning Attitudes in New South Wales, Australia,” by Perez et al., from Health Education Research (2015).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109789483&site=eds-live&scope=site
Read “Mass Media Campaign Impacts Influenza Vaccine Obtainment of University Students,” by Shropshire, Brent-Hotchkiss, and Andrews, from Journal of American College Health (2013).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=s3h&AN=91620318&site=eds-live&scope=site
Read “Social Media as a Tool to Increase the Impact of Public Health Research,” by Breland, Quintiliani, Schneider, May, and Pagoto, from American Journal of Public Health (2017).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=126117799&site=eds-live&scope=site
Read “Using Social Media, Online Social Networks, and Internet Search as Platforms for Public Health Interventions: A Pilot Study,” by Huesch, Galstyan, Ong, and Doctor, from Health Services Research (2016).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=115519798&site=eds-live&scope=site
Read “Lessons Learned in the Development and Evaluation of RxCoach, an mHealth App to Increase Tobacco Cessation Medication Adherence,” by Gordon, Armin, Cunningham, Muramoto, Christiansen, and Jacobs, from Patient Education and Counseling (2017).
URL:
http://www.sciencedirect.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0738399116305080?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffb
Read “A Point-of-Purchase Intervention Using Grocery Store Tour Podcasts About Omega-3s Increases Long-Term Purchases of Omega-3–Rich Food Items,” by Bangia, Shaffner, and Palmer-Keenan, from Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (2017).
URL:
http://www.sciencedirect.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S1499404617301306?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffb
Read “The Use of Social Media in Public Health Surveillance,” by Fung, Tse, and Fu, from Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Journal (2015).
URL:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4542478/pdf/WPSAR.2015.6.2-003.pdf
Read “The Use of Social Networking Sites for Public Health Practice and Research: A Systematic Review,” by Capurro, Cole, Echavarría, Joe, Neogi, and Turner, from Journal of Medical Internet Research (2014).
URL:
http://www.jmir.org/2014/3/e79/
Read “Healthcare Information on YouTube: A Systematic Review,” by Madathil, Rivera-Rodriguez, Greenstein, and Gramopadhye, from Health Informatics Journal (2015).
URL:
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1460458213512220
Read the blogpost, “Using Social Media to Extend the Reach of Local Public Health Departments” (2013), located on the Culture of Health Blog on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) website.
URL:
https://www.rwjf.org/en/culture-of-health/2013/07/using_social_mediat.html
Explore the Social Media Tools, Guidelines, and Best Practices page of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website.
URL:
https://www.cdc.gov/socialmedia/tools/guidelines/socialmediatoolkit.html
Explore the podcasts available under “Recent and Featured CDC Podcasts,” located on the Podcasts at CDC page of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website.
URL:
https://www2c.cdc.gov/podcasts/
Explore the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) YouTube Channel.
URL:
https://www.youtube.com/user/CDCStreamingHealth
MUST haveat least 5 citations with the page numbers and 5 references in APA format.(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.) Include at least one scholarly reference and appropriate in-text citations and Address all points on the DQ. One point will be deducted for not addressing each item mentioned above. Remember that presenting someone else’s work as your own is plagiarism.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class
I am a stickler for good organization in everything. I do not want to have to dig for your answers. For instance, if an assignment asks you to provide three examples of something, I suggest that you number them 1-3 so I can find them easily. I also expect that when you submit something as a narrative, you pay attention to how you organize your thoughts: use paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences; and change paragraphs whenever you introduce a new idea. Also, if there are multiple parts to an assignment, use sub-heads within the paper to organize them.
To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.
REMEMBER IN APA FORMAT JOURNAL TITLES AND VOLUME NUMBERS ARE ITALICIZED.
References
American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Covid 19 Health Administration Preparation for Pandemic Discussion essay help websites
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Covid 19 Health Administration Preparation for Pandemic Discussion
Question Description
COVID-19 Health Administration Preparation for Pandemic
1. Consider the current COVID-19 pandemic we are in. As a health care
administrator, working in a skilled nursing facility, you are responsible for disaster
planning for your facility inclusive of operations, staff and patients. You will need
to write up a 3-page disaster plan. This disaster plan will consider; planning and
organizing around staffing, quality issues, safety, communication, and
leadership.
a. Include in your disaster plan a literature review at the beginning of your
document or provide background about COVID-19. This is the “why” of
your next step.
b. Include the process your disaster plan should take. i.e. Decision-making
(centralized in a situation like this?), creating committees, roles and tasks,
Board involvement, etc.
c. Consider the flow of your plan. Do the steps you’ve designed make sense
in terms of continuity and connectedness. You may include a flow chart or
PDCA cycle here. You can refer to Donabedian’s
Structure/Process/Outcome model here.
d. What type of messaging is required? Keeping staff and patients updated.
How will you deliver your messages?
e. What sources of information would you use to create your messaging
(Must be credible sources)?
f. Utilize PDCA to evaluate your disaster plan.
2. Additional Directions: Create your plan for #1 above. Three page maximum; APA
format; pay attention to spacing and margins. A citation page (not included in the
3 page maximum) of your sources; sources must be reliable (.gov ARE THE BEST).
1.Adhere to page maximum
2.Use subheadings for a-h
3.Cover page not required
4. Abstract not required
5. Running Head not required
6. APA Style
no plagiarism
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
UC Transportation Strategies for Logistic Responses Powerpoint Presentation college application essay help online: college application essay help online
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
UC Transportation Strategies for Logistic Responses Powerpoint Presentation
School
University of Connecticut
Question Description
Transportation Strategies for Logistic Responses (individual)
This is a 5-8 minute PPT presentation describing your approach to providing transportation resources to support disaster operations. You must focus on method- Air,
The key is to identify what resources you will need and how you intend to support/resource it. This does not need to be detailed; by now you should have a good understanding on how to “deliver the goods”. 8″ slides max.
READINGS
1.Tatham and Christopher Chapter 2
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Management of a Depressed Patient Using Genetic Information PPT online essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Management of a Depressed Patient Using Genetic Information PPT
Question Description
Please see this website it has all the reading assignments and notes needed to complete this assignment.
http://openonlinecourses.com/ehr/SpecifyingSystemRequirementsInfo.asp
– Please see all the readings under the “Assigned Reading”
– Then do the assignment under “Do One assignment: Design How Genetic Info can be used…”
You can skip “What do you know?” and “More” sections
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Health Care Organization’s Security Program devry tutorcom essay help: devry tutorcom essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Saudi Electronic University Health Care Organization’s Security Program Paper
School
Saudi electronic university
Question Description
In details:
The healthcare organization’s security program (Wager et al., 2017, pp. 306-311), is a critical component to compliance with regulations as well as HIPAA.
Describe the steps involved in a security program.
Evaluate the risk analysis requirements for HIPAA using the websites furnished in the text. Discuss the security components, vulnerabilities, and security mitigation strategies.
Summarize the management action plan and the ultimate goal of conducting such an assessment.
Outline:
Introduction
Team Selection
Documentation
Security Risk Analysis
Action Plan
Manage and Mitigate Risks
Conclusion
Your paper should include the following:
4-5 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages.
7 references cited in the assignment above the text. Remember, you must support your thinking/statements and prior knowledge with references; all facts must be supported; in-text references used throughout the assignment must be included in an APA-formatted reference list.
Formatted according to the APA Guide to Writing
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Leading And Conflicts Management analysis homework essay help: homework essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Leading And Conflicts Management analysis
Home Sample Papers Leading And Conflicts Management analysis
Published by Emma Watson on November 22, 2019
Categories Tags
Leading And Conflicts Management
Leading is the act of ensuring that one is always ahead. Being a leader of a group of people means that you are always ahead when it comes to dealing with situations, coming up with strategies and generally in the implementation of the set plans. Being a leader means that you solely carry the responsibility of successful or unsuccessful execution all duties by your juniors, in that case a leader should lead by example (Follett, 1940). If you want exemplary performance from your team, be an exemplary leader. A good leader is one who is approachable by his juniors; leaders should not instil fear but should command respect always. This creates a friendly environment which fosters sharing of ideas. This is the birth place of inventions and innovations.
Leaders should always create a motivational environment, where the juniors feel they always want to cooperate. Proper leadership should embrace bureaucracy in its execution (Follett, 1940). This is because a bureaucratic form of leadership has all roles of the members clearly outlined. This helps to create accountability and responsibility. There is also hierarchy in power and authority where one person only has one boss whom he takes orders from.
Conflicts occur when two or more parties are not able to agree upon something, it can be about the model of implementation and task performance or about the personality misunderstandings that arise (Behfar, 2008). Conflict management are actions that are aimed to ensure that only positive outcomes arise from the model and not negative ones. There has to be a proper evaluation of the type of conflict that is arising in order to know how to best deal with it.
There are basically two types of conflicts substantive and affective. Substantive is conflict based on task, performance and methods of implementation of a task. Affective is based on the relationship between and among the people at work (Behfar, 2008). The most effective ways of managing these conflicts include; as a leader one should take time to look at the conflict and analyze it properly, if it is possible, a leader should analyze a situation before it gets to the point where there is a conflict, however assuming that the conflict has already arisen. The leader should find out the main cause of the conflict, in this stage he should include the parties involved in the conflict and hear both sides. Conflicts are usually emotions that arise when people fail to see eye to eye.
When the task has to be done, the parties are asked to put their emotions aside and do what is expected of them. In terms of conflicts based on relationship, the leader should learn not to pair up the involved parties. The leader should take a domineering role and not coerce but indicate that conflict is not acceptable at work. The one thing that he should not do is ignore the problem and hope that it will go away. It will simply not, this is because managers end up spending 20% of their time on conflict resolutions when they could have simply managed it and it would not have happened (Behfar, 2008).
When it comes to conflicts, the one thing that all parties involved should always be ready to do either willingly or through coercion is to compromise. This is because if people dwell so much on conflicts no work will be done in the long run.
References
Behfar, K. J., Peterson, R. S., Mannis, E. A., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2008). The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology.
Follett, M. P. (1940). Constructive Leadership. In H. C. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 30–49). New York: Harper & Row. (originally published 1926).
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
West Coast University Week 3 COVID 19 Pandemic Infectious Disease Research Paper summary and response essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
West Coast University Week 3 COVID 19 Pandemic Infectious Disease Research Paper
School
West Coast University
Question Description
This week, you will conduct an outbreak investigation of a disease.
You are an epidemiologist for your local health department, and you are conducting an outbreak investigation of the disease you chose for this week’s discussion.
In your role as a health department official, you are interviewing a fictitious patient who has/had this disease. Using research you gathered when completing your discussion assignment, complete this questionnaire with this fictitious patient’s information to determine clues to the outbreak.
Write a 1- to 2-page paper in which you present a hypothesis on how this outbreak could have been prevented. What prevention techniques have you learned about in the course materials and your discussions with your classmates that could have averted this outbreak?
Your paper must be 3–4 pages in length (including the questionnaire). Include evidence or information from at least two credible external sources and follow APA style for formatting and citation.
Your textbook and supplemental reading material may be used as a reference. The APA format for your text is as follows:
Nelson, K. E. (2014). Infectious disease epidemiology (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Principles of epidemiology in public health practice: Self-study course (3rd ed.). Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
NSU Impact of External Environmental Factors on Healthcare Organization Strategies Summary devry tutorcom essay help: devry tutorcom essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
NSU Impact of External Environmental Factors on Healthcare Organization Strategies Summary
School
Nova Southeastern University
Question Description
Accountable health care leaders must respond to external factors in a way that is advantageous for the organization and the community. While health care organizations must strive to improve their financial positions, it should never be at the expense of the populations they are serving. For this Assignment, examine the following scenario and consider strategies to limit the negative impact of external factors and improve organizational success.
Scenario: A small independent hospital in rural Georgia is seeking to attain Magnet Status. This designation demonstrates to stakeholders that the organization is committed to delivering high-quality patient care. With this designation, the organization can easily attract and retain a highly-engaged clinical staff. Moreover, it provides the organization an opportunity to market itself to potential patients as the place to receive top-quality care. This means that the organization could realize a greater market share of insured and private pay patients traveling as far as 100 miles just to receive the quality services. It also positions the organization to enter into joint ventures with physician groups eager to provide new services, which would lead to increased revenue streams.
Although the designation sounds like a great opportunity for the organization, the board of directors is split on their support of this designation. The board members in support of the designation understand the great value that this program will bring to the facility; however, those in opposition learned from a research study that non-magnet hospitals had better infection control and less post-operative sepsis. They also learned from another study that working conditions in a magnet facility are not better than those in non-magnet facilities. Therefore, the dissenting directors have concluded that the organization should not invest its time and resources to seek this credential. The CEO must get support from an overwhelming majority of the board to move forward with pursuing this designation.
To prepare:
Review the provided scenario and consider external environmental factors that may impact the organization’s strategic planning (e.g., policy and economics, laws and ethics, health care quality, and population health).
Note: Your Assignment should show effective application of triangulation of content and resources in your conclusion and recommendations.
The Assignment
In a 2-page executive summary, do the following:
Identify and evaluate the impact of external environmental factors on the strategic planning of the organization in the scenario.
Recommend strategies to address these external factors and limit their influence on organizational operations.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Walden University Addiction from Multiple Perspectives Discussion free essay help online
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Walden University Addiction from Multiple Perspectives Discussion
School
Walden University
Question Description
Discussion 1: Taking Sides: Viewing Addiction from Multiple Perspectives
There is no “right” perspective on addiction, merely competing viewpoints. In order to truly understand addiction, and to be able to effectively discuss addiction with your clients and colleagues, you need to understand each model for addressing addiction, as well as the theories that provide support these models. Once you understand all of the models, only then can you decide which one you find fits best with your own beliefs and opinions.
Post by Day 3 an explain addiction from the model/perspective assigned to you by your Instructor this week (medical, physical dependence, or behavioral/choice). Within your Discussion post, be sure to include theoretical and empirical support for your assigned model/perspective.
Note: Students will be assigned a perspective by the Instructor to ensure all three models/perspectives are addressed in the Discussion. Rosalyn and Victoria: Physical Dependence Model
It should be noted that the Diagnostic Criteria for Substance Dependence/Abuse listed on p. 89 in the Lichtblau text. Please reference the DSM–V Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders section for current criteria.
READINGS
Advokat, C. D., & Comaty, J. E., & Julien, R. M. (2019). Julien’s primer of drug action: A comprehensive guide to the actions, uses, and side effects of psychoactive drugs (14th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers/Macmillan.
Chapter 4, “Epidemiology and Neurobiology of Addiction” (pp. 106-128)
Lichtblau, L. (2011). Psychopharmacology demystified (1st ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Delmar/Cengage Learning.
Chapter 7, “Neurobiology of Addiction” (pp. 87–105)
Hancock, S. D, & McKim, W. A. (2018). Drugs and behavior: An introduction to behavioral pharmacology (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Chapter 5, “Substance Use and Addictive Disorders” (pp. 85-117)
Ali, S. F., Onaivi, E. S., Dodd, P. R., Cadet, J. L., Schenk, S., Kuhar, M. J., & Koob, G. F. (2011). Understanding the global problem of drug addiction is a challenge for IDARS scientists. Current Neuropharmacology, 9(1), 2–7.
Understanding the Global Problem of Drug Addiction is a Challenge for IDARS Scientists by Ali, S.F.; Onaivi, E.S.; Dodd, P.R.; Cadet, J.L.; Schenk, S.; Kuhar, M.J.; Koob, G.F., in Current Neuropharmacology, Vol. 9/Issue 1. Copyright 2011 by Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. Reprinted by permission of Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Edwards, S. & Koob, G. F. (2010). Neurobiology of dysregulated motivational systems in drug addiction. Future Neurology, 5(3), 393–401.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Koob, G., & Volkow, N. D. (2010). Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology: Official Publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(1), 217–238.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
MEDIA
Laureate Education (Producer). (2013). In their own words [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu. (PSYC 8741/PSYC 8741P)
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 23 minutes.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2013). Physiological effects of addictive substances [Interactive Media]. Retrieved from Laureate CDN Files database.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 13 minutes. Please click on the following link for the transcript: Transcript (PDF).
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
AHS7670 Wilmington Week 5 Essential Knowledge Areas and Skills Discussion computer science essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
AHS 7670 Wilmington Week 5 Essential Knowledge Areas and Skills Discussion
Course
AHS 7670
School
Wilmington University
Department
AHS
Question Description
In order to effectively manage co-occurring treatment services, it is important to be knowledgeable about addiction and mental illness. Describe three (3) essential knowledge areas and three (3) essential skill areas that are needed by staff and clinical supervisors for co-occurring treatment services. What professional credentials would be necessary for an employee and clinical supervisor who works in co-occurring treatment?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Irvine Valley College Sternocleidomastoid Muscle List buy argumentative essay help: buy argumentative essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Irvine Valley College Sternocleidomastoid Muscle List
School
Irvine Valley College
Question Description
The next topic was to be muscles. I will do an online lecture while we workout to drill these names. For this week in leiu of class – and to give both you and me time to prepare for interactive portions of the course in this unusual learning situation…Here is a muscle assignment. See also Modules.
1. Muscle Lecture: Read the handout on Muscles. Muscle Lecture.pdfPreview the document How they are named? What are their characteristics, how does a muscle contract? how can learn the actions? and… What are the types of contractions? See below for the youtubelink and write:
a. This is about the sliding filament theory: What are the names of the two proteins involved? Which one moves and which stays still?
b. What mineral must be present for a muscle to be able to contract?
b. Explain 2 additional new things you learned from the videohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ousflrOzQHc (Links to an external site.)
Here is a picture summary of the steps: steps muscle contraction.jpg
2. Muscle list study guide – “general locations” , attachments, the joints they cross, and actions. What are the differences in specific location and thus actions for muscles that have the same general location? Print the Muscle list, MUSCLE_LIST4(1).pdfPreview the document, fill it out and email it back (you can take photo and send that OR type into the word document MUSCLE_LIST4(1).docPreview the document OR type in your computer and just include each on the list. This list has mainly muscle groups but also some individual muscles important to your issues. Pick 20 of the 32 muscles listed starting with those related to the areas that effect your 3 specific goals.
3. Here are some resources: Here is the front and back in one file muscles front and back.pdfPreview the document and here are pictures of muscles just showing one side of the body: Musclesfront.jpg, Musclesback.jpg
Muscle websites – Use these to help fill out the list: the focus is the actions related to the one or more joints. Complete muscle attachments it starts ___________ and goes to _______________ – “in general means” for instance something like the pubic bone to the cartilage of fixed ribs 5 on down (5-7 is more specific than needed) and bottom of sternum (xiphoid process is stated but some people, like myself, do not have a xiphoid process, and is more specific than necessary).
http://anatomy.uams.edu/muscles_alpha.html (Links to an external site.)
https://quizlet.com/17188838/muscle-actions-flash-cards/ (Links to an external site.)
http://www.ptdirect.com/training-design/anatomy-and-physiology/key-muscle-locations-and-actions (Links to an external site.)
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
AHS7670 Wilmington University Week 5 Treatment Program Management Reaction Paper college essay help nyc
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
AHS 7670 Wilmington University Week 5 Treatment Program Management Reaction Paper
Course
AHS 7670
School
Wilmington University
Department
AHS
Question Description
Please complete a 3-5 page reaction paper addressing the following areas:
The day-to-day program management in providing co-occurring treatment services is multifaceted.
Name and explain what you believe to be the 3 top qualities of an effective manager of co-occurring treatment programs.
Name and describe 3 management activities that you believe are the most important for the day-to-day management of co-occurring treatment services.
Name and describe 4 steps that are involved in implementing staff development training for co-occurring treatment programs.
It is suggested that you use headings to address each bulleted item. This will help to ensure that you cover all of what is asked for this assignment.
Please make sure that your paper is written in the appropriate APA format, including specific references to the learning resources used in its preparation.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Nursing Shortage Essay Assignment write my essay help: write my essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
George Mason University Nursing Shortage Essay
School
George Mason University
Question Description
Parts A & B: 2 double-spaced pages max!
A.Identify a health care issue and describe why this issue is of concern and/or interest to you. Include evidence that supports the need for this issue to become a public policy (not an action by the healthcare industry). YOUR TOPIC SHOULD BE VERY SPECIFIC AND NARROW IN SCOPE, MAKING IT A MORE FEASIBLE AND EFFECTIVE POLICY. AS NOTED ABOVE, THE ISSUE CANNOT BE ONE CURRENTLY BEING PROPOSED.
You will need to provide reference sources for this information.
B.Determine what kind of public policy your healthcare issue needs. From the textbook, and what you learned from the Week 2 lecture, identify whether the policy should be a distributive or regulatory policy, and why.
Part C: 4 double-spaced pages
C.Applying what you have learned in the class, produce a strategy for realizing your desire to have government address your health problem or concern. Your strategy will include the following:
1.How you plan to accomplish your desire to have government address your problem. This includes:
a. Identification of special interest groups NOT PART OF GOVERNMENT you will work with to get your issue/concern on the political agenda of policy makers in government.
b. Determination of how best to advocate/lobby for your issue to government policymakers, including to whom in government you will be targeting your lobbying efforts, and how you plan to get their attention and support.
C(1): 2 double-spaced pages
2.Draft a bill that outlines your issue (briefly) and what government should do.
Use the same format and template provided for the “Draft a Bill” homework assignment.
C(2): 2 single-spaced pages
The paper should be a total of 6 pages (not including title page and references) with 1” margins, 11pt font.
The concern will either address:
Nursing shortages
or
Medical testing on animals
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Critical Thinking in Nursing Leadership Discussion School common app essay help: common app essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Miami Dade College Critical Thinking in Nursing Leadership Discussion
School
Miami Dade College
Question Description
Please respond to these 2 different research paper separately. The response should be 1 to 2 paragraphs per research paper with a minimum of 250 words including 2 different reference and citation per each paragraph.
**** It should be 2 separate response with one to two paragraph each**** The response should be done as a research with 2 reference each.
Also, please include in the research whether you agree or disagree with each research or share the same opinion.
Style: APA
References: 2 each
double space
Please see attachment for the research paper responses
Please contact me if you have any questions in regards to the instruction
Thank you
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Service Learning Teaching Method Analysis Essay gp essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Miami Dade College Service Learning Teaching Method Analysis Essay
School
Miami Dade College
Question Description
Research service learning method and write a 500-word essay describing this method. Begin with introductory paragraph about teaching methods in general, and introduce the method that you chose to research. Include a description of a teaching scenario that you can envision of at least one way in which this method could appropriately be applied to any aspect of education.
Note: Remember…do not write papers in the first person. Also, as you are instructed to “research” the topic, you must APA cite your sources within the text, and you must therefore have an APA Reference page with this paper. Use at least 2 resources, one of which may be your Tools for Teaching textbook and one current, peer-reviewed journal article (no older than 2009) from the SPC library database.
I have uploaded one article from the school library database and the pages the book needed
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Personal Challenge and Dietary Behaviors Discussion essay help service: essay help service
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Ashworth College Wk 1 Personal Challenge and Dietary Behaviors Discussion
School
Ashworth College
Question Description
my name is Brenna Norman I wanna become a RN by 2025 I’m from Illinois. I do have celiac disease. I will send the students discussion when they are adding the
Share your name, where you are from, and anything else you would like to share. In addition, please respond to the following questions: What personal challenges do you face with regard to dietary behaviors? Many of us struggle with eating too much of the “wrong” foods, or eating too little of the “right” foods – what do you think is the key to achieving and maintaining a healthy diet?
You are welcome to present your answers to these questions using PowerPoint or another tool of your choice.
Guided Response: Respond to at least three of your classmates’ posts. Review your peers’ personal challenges relating to dietary behaviors and offer potential solutions for overcoming these challenges. Each peer response should contain at least 100 words.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Guarantee Validity and Feasibility of a Research Study college essay help nyc
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Miami Dade College Guarantee Validity and Feasibility of a Research Study Paper
School
Miami Dade College
Question Description
Please do the research based on the question below.
Question: How can you guarantee validity and feasibility in your research study with a mix method?
This research paper needs to have 3 paragraphs with at least 5 sentences (minimum 125 words for each paragraph). Please use at least 3 references and include citation on each paragraph.
Style: APA
References: 3
Double space
Rubric attached.
Please let me know if you have any questions or need information in regards the subject.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Why Nutrition Is Important Discussion computer science essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Ashworth College Wk 1 Why Nutrition Is Important Discussion
School
Ashworth College
Question Description
A Lifetime of Nourishment
As noted in the textbook, “Of the leading causes of death listed in Table 1-1, four – heart disease, cancers, strokes, and diabetes – are directly related to nutrition, and another – accidents- is related to drinking alcohol” (Sizer & Whitney, 2017, p. 3). Expanding on the information from the quote above, please provide a comprehensive response to the following statements:
Analyze why nutrition is important and how it impacts physical and mental health as well as increases our risk for disease if inadequate diets are consumed.
Distinguish the six classes of nutrients and explain how they individually and collectively help us to maintain our health status.
Discuss the five characteristics of a healthy diet and provide a dietary example for each.
Explain how nutrition is a science and how the scientific method is used in this field.
Summarize the four different types of studies (case, epidemiological, intervention, and laboratory studies) and explain the use of research in the development of dietary guidelines.
Appraise the six stages of behavior change and provide a diet-related example for each of the stages.
This assignment must be a minimum of three pages in length (excluding title and references pages) in APA format as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Use subheadings to help organize your paper. Include a minimum of two scholarly sources, in addition to the course text, cited according to APA format as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. At least one of your sources must be from the Ashford University Library.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Good Diet Promotes Human Health Discussion common app essay help: common app essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Ashworth College Wk 1 Good Diet Promotes Human Health Discussion
School
Ashworth College
Question Description
We often hear about the importance of eating healthy and maintaining a healthy lifestyle; however, many Americans struggle to accomplish this goal. Countless individuals around the world still fail to realize the significance of healthy eating and the subsequent benefits to our health and overall well-being.
Analyze the connection between diet and health.
Select two nutrients, which can positively affect our health and well-being. Why are these nutrients crucial to our health?
Explain two consequences on our health, resulting from inadequate or improper nutrition. In your response, be sure to include information on malnutrition and chronic disease.
Your initial contribution should be 250 to 300 words in length. Your research and claims must be supported by your course text and a minimum of one additional scholarly source. Use proper APA formatting for in-text citations and references as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Guided Response: Review several of your classmates’ posts and respond to at least two of your peers. Each peer response should contain 100 words at a minimum. How was your peer’s research different from your own findings regarding the connection between diet and health and the consequences of inadequate nutrition?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
H400 HSA4191 Rasmussen College Role of Technology in Improving Long Term Care Essay college admission essay help houston tx
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
H 400 HSA 4191 Rasmussen College Role of Technology in Improving Long Term Care Essay
Course
H 400 HSA 4191
School
Rasmussen College
Department
H HSA
Question Description
Long Term Care
Write an introductory paragraph that discusses the elements from your outline that will be covered in your course project paper. Be sure to use correct grammar and spelling. In your introductory paragraph:
Identify the topic you have selected.
Discuss why the topic you have selected is important to you and to the industry.
Explain what will be discussed in your paper.
Create a reference list, following APA formatting, with at least three different resources related to your selected topic, that you will use when writing your course project paper.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
NRS433V GCU Consultant Intervention to Increased Breastfeeding Rate easy essay help: easy essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
NRS 433V GCU Consultant Intervention to Increased Breastfeeding Rate Paper
Course
NRS 433V
School
Grand Canyon University
Department
NRS
Question Description
Can you write this paper following/adjusting this PICOT statement.
In hospitalized postpartum mothers, does a consult with the lactation nurse increase the rates of breastfeeding, compared to mothers who breastfeed but did not consult with a lactation nurse.
P- Hospitalized postpartum mothers
I- Lactation nurse consult with postpartum mothers
C- No lactation nurse consult
O- Increased rates of breastfeeding
T- 4-8 weeks
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
DNP836 GCU Diverse Student Learning Needs Assessment essay help online: essay help online
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
DNP 836 GCU Diverse Student Learning Needs Assessment Discussion
Course
DNP 836
School
Grand Canyon University
Department
DNP
Question Description
In education, student diversity has a significant influence on the selection of teaching strategies. Clearly understanding your students’ needs is the first step to ensuring you develop instruction that will effectively meet those needs. Students’ needs are determined by multiple variables ranging from cognitive abilities to cultural and socioeconomic factors.
For this assignment you will conduct a needs assessment and describe a group of students in relation to a learning goal you would like to them achieve. Ideally, these are students you have access to in your practicum setting.
First, determine a learning goal for your group of students. This can range from a specific nursing skill to broader theoretical knowledge.
Next, research needs assessment tools and use or develop one tool appropriate for the students in your practicum setting. There are a variety of needs assessment tools from which to choose, and an appropriate one should provide a way to measure the current knowledge base of the students. The tool should also help you identify student characteristics, such as student learning preferences and needs and access to technology and resources.
You will administer the tool, collect your feedback, analyze the results, and report your findings. Include the following in a report of 1,000-1,250 words:
Identify the needs assessment tool and explain how it is appropriate for the students in your setting
Summarize the general, shared characteristics of your students.
Discuss the specific characteristics that distinguish your students from one another.
Discuss how your students’ similarities and differences would impact your approach to facilitating learning for this diverse group.
Discuss potential methods for evaluating whether or not your approach is working for each of your students.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Subpoena of Medical Records Case Study Discussion admission essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Columbia Southern University Subpoena of Medical Records Case Study Discussion
School
Columbia Southern University
Question Description
Instructions
Read the court case titled “Attorney Guilty of Unauthorized Disclosure of Medical Information” found on page 41 of your textbook. As you read the case study, consider both sides of the issue with regards to the psychiatrist and the attorney.
Once you have read and analyzed the case study, consider the concepts and topics discussed within this chapter and how they play into this situation. Next, answer the following questions regarding the psychiatrist and attorney:
If you were the psychiatrist in this situation, would you have allowed the medical records to be subpoenaed? Why, or why not? How can you appeal a subpoena of medical records? Do you believe that the psychiatrist in this case was guilty of a breach of confidentiality? Explain your reasoning.
If you were the attorney in this situation, would you have subpoenaed the medical records? Why, or why not? Considering the man’s medical history, could this be considered a breach of ethics? What if it involved child endangerment? Explain your reasoning as you answer these questions.
Respond to these questions in a Word document. Your responses should be at least one page, double-spaced, with Times New Roman 12 pt. font.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Public Health Malnutrition Among Children Annotated Bibliography persuasive essay help: persuasive essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
AT Still University Public Health Malnutrition Among Children Annotated Bibliography
School
AT Still University
Question Description
Determine a public health problem or topic that is of interest to you. This topic will be used throughout this course and in writing the culminating research proposal. If you have questions, please contact your instructor.
Conduct a PubMed search (not a Google search) to find five quality, recent, peer-reviewed articles for your review. Using the link http://guides.library.cornell.edu/annotatedbibliography (Links to an external site.), prepare an annotated bibliography of these five research articles (one page per article). Each annotation should include a full citation and a summary of the main points and purpose of the work, including:
Evaluation of the authority, or background of the author (1-2 sentences)
Purpose of the study (1 sentence)
Study design (1 sentence)
Description of methods–including a description of the study subjects and methods for data collection (3-5 sentences)
Main results and conclusions (2-5 sentences)
At the end of each annotated bibliography entry, assess and analyze the significance of public health journal articles to your topic. Discuss how this work will be useful for your own research proposal, and discuss any limitations of the article.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Pro & Con Paper Draft Paragraph & Prompt Response for Genetic Engineering Essay high school essay help
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Pro & Con Paper Draft Paragraph & Prompt Response for Genetic Engineering Essay
Question Description
Initial Post Instructions
Draft a body paragraph for the upcoming pro/con position paper, incorporating one paraphrase and one quote.
The paragraph should contain a topic sentence, evidence, and conclusion/connection. Strive for a minimum of 5 complete sentences.
The paraphrase should be introduced with a signal phrase.
The quote should be introduced and explained.
Both the paraphrase and quote should be cited in-text and on a reference page.
Then, answer the following prompts:
Explain your approach to paraphrasing vs quoting.
What made the quote stand out?
Based on the information from the Turnitin plagiarism link, how did you ensure both the paraphrase and quote were not plagiarized?
How did reviewing the Turnitin plagiarism link impact how you incorporated your resources?
Do you prefer to paraphrase or quote? Why is that the case?
That’s the article that needs to be used… let me know if you can’t open it
https://search-ebscohost-com.chamberlainuniversity…
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Get ProfessionalPLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!