The main characters Mrs. Loisel in “The Necklace” and the grandmother in “A Good Man is Hard to Find” are very similar because both these characters refused to admit to a mistake that they had made. They both had the same motivation prior to the mistake and they also had the same reason as to why they wanted to keep quiet about it. Although Mrs. Lisle’s and the grandmother’s penalties were different, it is still fair to compare the two because either way, dead or alive, both their lives were ruined.
Mrs. Loisel and the grandmother are very similar due to the fact that they both had the same motivation prior to their accident. It was a selfish motivation that cost them their lives. Mrs. Loisel’s character was selfish in “The Necklace” because instead of wearing flowers like her husband suggested, she chose to borrow her friend’s jewelry. “You can wear some natural flowers. At this season they look very chic. For ten francs you can have two or three magnificent roses. ‘No, she replied, there is nothing more humiliating than to have a shabby air in the midst of rich women.'” (67) This is truly an act of selfishness on Mrs. Loisel’s part. If she wouldn’t have been so arrogant, she could have just worn the flowers to the party and it would have saved her a lot of trouble.
The grandmother’s character in “A Good Man is Hard to Find” is also very selfish in her motivations. She felt she had to lie to her son, daughter-in-law and her grandchildren in order for her to be able to see that nice house again. “‘There was a secret panel in this house’ she said craftily, not telling the truth but wishing that she were, ‘and the story went that all the family sil…
… middle of paper …
… comparable because like I illustrated before, they were both selfish people.
All in all, these two characters were very similar. They both had the same selfish motivations. They both wanted something, and they didn’t care what they did to get it. They also had the same reasons for keeping their secrets quiet, they were afraid of embarrassment. And in the end they both ruined their lives. Mrs. Loisel had to be a hard working woman for 10 years, which really took a toll on her. The grandmother was killed, as well as the rest of her family. If Mrs. Loisel and the grandmother would have told the truth from the start none of this would have happened. But now, just like most everyone in life, they were forced to pay the consequences for doing something wrong. Even though they didn’t deserve the punishment they got, I guess it was all in the “luck” of the draw.
Pity the Bear in Judith Minty’s story, Killing the Bear
Pity the Bear in Judith Minty’s story, Killing the Bear
Judith Minty’s story, “Killing the Bear,” is a rather chilling tale about a woman who shoots a bear to death. The story is not merely a simple account of the incident however. It is full of stories and facts about bears, which affect how the reader reacts to the story. In the beginning, the reader expects the bear to be portrayed as a cold-blooded monster who must be killed for the safety of the primary character however this expectation is foiled throughout the story and the reader sees the bear in a very different light. Due to the stories and facts given about bears throughout the story, the reader comes to pity the bear, but most will still acknowledge the necessity of killing him.
The beginning of the story seems very quiet and peaceful. It sets up a scene many people would be familiar with. Even the story about the dog is one most people who have ever owned a house pet would instantly recognize. The woman does seem very vulnerable, however. She is outside in a hammock and the dog seems very little help since “she ended up more his protector than the other way around” (2). The second section sets up frightening images of animals, but they are all in the zoo, so they pose no threat. Yet, this still sustains the reader’s original expectation of the bear being a threatening animal. Of all the zoo animals described, the bear seems the most harmless, yet she is still afraid of it. The reader has not been shown any danger yet, but there is still a sense of something about to happen. The only bear we have seen is a “bundle of clothes by [a] dead tree” (5) in a cage at the zoo.
The third section of the story returns the reader to the calm security, but then quickly sends the tone of the story into a frenzy. These constant tone changes show the reader how strong and resourceful the woman is, but it also shows us how she can be thrown into a panic easily. We come to have little confidence in the main character’s ability to react well if a dangerous situation arises.
Throughout the story, “Killing the Bear,” the reader is given a number of side notes about bears and the woman’s experience with them.