How can one distinguish happiness from unhappiness if unhappiness is never experienced? It’s the bad that makes the good look good, but if you don’t know the good from the bad, you’ll settle for what you’re given. Can people judge their feelings without a basis or underlying “rubric” to follow? Such rudimentary guidelines are established through the maturation process and continue to fluctuate as one grows wiser with a vaster array of experiences. Aldous Huxley creates a utopia filled with happiness, but this is merely a facade to a world which is incomplete and quite empty since the essential “experiences” are replaced with “conditioning.” Perhaps this fantasy world was distinctly composed to be a harbinger of our future. An analysis of an “exclusive utopia” designed to heed the present world from becoming desensitized to freedom and individualism and to warn against the danger of an overly progressive scientific and technological society.
Huxley commences his story at the source of such world control — the hatchery. Governed by mottoes of “Community, Identity, and Stability,” the “brave new world” he creates is “conditioned” from the start. The test tube babies undergo precise tests, dietary supplements, and encouragement to “produce” the defined castes of “individuals.”
The central action arises when Bernard Marx, an alpha plus psychologist, becomes continually irritated at the boredom and incompleteness of this highly regulated life. Through his independent thinking he becomes frustrated and feels alone. Such feelings Marx shares with his close friend Helmholtz Watson, who was advantageously decanted in his “test tubular stages” and therefore has an …
… middle of paper …
…domination. the Bokanovsky Process, in which one egg is “budded” into hundreds and thousands making a shocking number of “twins” and then the decanting process, the actual birth form the test tube, and finally, the social conditioning processes in which people are “formed” by means of shocks, sirens, and other unpleasant devices to certain stimuli so that they will always evoke certain intrinsic feelings toward those stimuli. The idea of such a “precision-made” society to accomplish work and live in happiness and virtue leaves no room for “imperfection.” Such imperfections as Marx, Watson, and the savage however are no threat to the society as apparent in the novel since they are swallowed by the system– if nobody listens to their ideas, talking does no good. Such automatic suppression of the “rebels” leaves the reader with a frigid feeling of helplessness.
Brave New World: Out of Control
Brave New World: Out of Control
In the 1932 satirical novel Brave New World, Aldous Huxley describes an emotionless, mechanized world of the future, set mostly in London, in which individuality is eliminated, creativity is stifled, and such institutions as marriage, family, and church are unpleasant artifacts of a world long gone. In this society, people are mass-produced; human eggs are artificially engineered by technicians. Happiness is achieved through physical gratification and peace is safeguarded by the conditioning of youth and by dispensing soma, a tranquilizer. Bernard Marx is the main character and his unorthodox viewpoints and physical difference from the rest of his caste makes him as an outsider. Bernard and Lenina, his present “girlfriend”, receive permission to visit a Savage Reservation in New Mexico. They return to “civilization” with a savage, John. There he struggles to understand this so-called utopia and is eventually driven to suicide while Bernard is exiled to an island for his unconventional beliefs.
Bernard Marx’s bitter nonconformity comes from his resentment towards the state and its citizens. Dark and small when he should be fair and tall like the Alpha-plus he is mentally, he is a social outcast. He is essentially an opportunist who just wants to be accepted, just wants “no more talk of the alcohol in his blood-surrogate, no gibes at his physical appearance”(156). Nevertheless, Bernard is the perfect character through which to highlight the utopia’s moral values or the lack thereof.
In Brave New World, Bernard fights against a society that devalues his individuality and thereby lessens his sense of identity and self worth. From birt…
… middle of paper …
…n’t want change. Every change is a menace to stability”(224-5). The idea of keeping an individual preoccupied with meaningless or unnecessary tasks so that he might never question his own individuality is an important one and forms the base on which their society is built. When Bernard criticized this social order in his report to Mond on the Savage, the World Controller vowed “to give him a lesson”(159), which he ultimately did.
Huxley attempts to unsettle the reader’s uncritical faith in progress and technology. The novel is a fantasy of order and technology and in it he warns us that if we don’t solve problems such as overpopulation and overconsumption ourselves now, a police state will do it for us. Without being able to balance progress and human need, and unable to control our own technology, we may be forced to give up more than we imagine.