Get help from the best in academic writing.

An Analysis of To His Coy Mistress

The poem, To His Coy Mistress, by Andrew Marvell brings out some actions that some of us have experienced or even thought about in this concise poem. This poem is very appealing to the male senses and what some make are like. Some women could be thought of when this is read. Andrew Marvell puts it in words that make it seem as if it was very acceptable.

The first twenty lines of the poem start to talk about how much this girl means to this perticular man. The main character in the poem talks about how he will wait forever to be with her. He mentions that “We would sit down and think which way To walk and pass our long love’s day.” (st. 3-4) His views as of now are that he wants to take his time and he doesn’t have go anywhere. This man certainly wants to plan things out so that it will be perfect. Another line from the poem that makes him the gentleman that he is portraying to be is “An hundred years should go to praise Thine eyes and on thy forehead gaze. “(st.13-14) I think he is saying that we will give praise to her eyes that are so magnificent. Her eyes are so beautiful, because of which he will praise them for hundred years before they can truly be together. Later on it mentions that he will praise her breast each for two hundred years. The mood is set that this man certainly wants to be with this woman. He is telling her how he feels and wants her to understand that he really wants to be with her.

In the next twelve lines we begin to see a bit of difference in the attitude. As of now the guy is thinking, well maybe we don’t have enough time to sit around and wait. The chariot’s of time is pointed out by saying that it is hurrying near. Maybe we don’t have enough time anymore. We should hurry up and get with it. “Thy beauty shall no more be found, Nor, in thy marble vault shall sound.”(st. 25-26) I imagine that he is telling her that if we wait to long then you shall be dead and then we would have never gotten the chance. He is trying to tell her that they should hurry it up.

Free Things They Carried Essays: Syntactic and Paratactic Interpretation

Syntactic and Paratactic Interpretation of The Things They Carried

The syntactic and paratactic styles of interpretation are both needed to interpret Tim O’Briens “The Things They Carried”. The syntactic aspect of interpretation deals with the imaginary or the things that aren’t said, but that are implied or that happen outside of what is said. Paratactic interpretation deals with the concrete details that stand out and are specifically stated. The media, although it didn’t change the outcome of the war much because it provided coverage of both negative and positive aspects, it was the first war to be covered by the media and therefore what it did cover, people believed. This can be observed in Tim O’Briens novel on the coverage of how the war started and how it was covered after the war started.
The historical approach to this novel with respect to the syntactic aspect can be observed if one looks at what the media said had started the war. The media stated that the war had been started because U.S. ships had been fired upon in friendly waters by hostile warships. Paratacticly this makes sense and should have started a war in which we sent over troops that felt that they were protecting their country, which might have actually changed the outcome of the war. Syntactically, though, the story was that we had been in two previous tiffs (Cuba and Laos) and had lost. This caused the president to be looked at in an unfavorable light, which made him and others in power, to stage a war that he thought we could win. In reality there were no known hostile ships anywhere near the area that our ships went down and he was blindly following a belief that communism should be contained in order not to have a domino effect. The media later portrayed this portrait of the war, but it was too late for many young teenagers that had just gotten out of high school. Another example of syntactic analysis is where the media reported a death count. Paratactically the death count represented the number of bodies dead, but this is misleading. The death count, for one thing, is misleading because the entire country was covered with mines and these explosives killed both friend and foe. After they had gone off, there was little left of the body. This leads to miscounting because if the body is blown into microscopic pieces it is hard to tell if one, two, or three people died, and who’s side they were on.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.