The earliest immigrants who settled in North America were the Puritans in 1621. Unlike their predecessors in the late sixteenth, who ventured to America for the sole purpose of seeking gold and glory; the Puritans sought refuge in a vast new land, and freedom to practice their beliefs without fear of recourse from governing authority. In compact with the monarchy, the Church of England, and Anglican officials routinely oppressed and harassed the Separatists. William Bradford in his history, Of Plymouth Plantation, wrote of the Puritans, ” But after these things they could not longer continue in any peaceable condition, but were hunted and persecuted on every side, so as their former afflictions were but as flea-bitings in comparison of these which now came upon them. For some were taken and clapped up in prison, others had their houses beset and watched night and day, and hardly escaped their hands; and the most were fain to flee and leave their houses and habitations, and the means of their livelihood ” (Bradford 9).
In de-emphasizing the role of the Church, it’s rituals, and offices, and supplanting them with a more direct and personal approach to God and spirituality; the Protestant Reformation, through the works of Martin…
… middle of paper …
…ared a common experience in the Old World as well as the New World, and both groups held in common a trust that God would provide the means necessary that would ease and hasten their struggle for peace, and their belief in freedom from oppression and persecution. Although each group’s faith is different, their cultures and traditions divergent; they met resistance to their way of life and living with an historical perspective with God and the idea of progress on their side. Every immigrant story is a progression in every realm of thought.
Works Cited
1.William Bradford. Of Plymouth Plantation 1620-1647 1981. New York: Random House.
2.Anzia Yezierska. Bread Givers 1925. New York: Doubleday
3. Chaim Potok. Wanderings: History of the Jews 1978 New York: Fawcett Crest
4. Charlotte Erickson Emmigration From Europe 1815-1914 1976. London: A
Violating A Social Norm Essay
The daunting task of violating a social norm, something that I could be ostracized and ridiculed for, I still chose to do. Social norms are the rules of behavior that are considered acceptable in a group or society. Doing weird things in public while surrounded by strangers is a recipe for disaster, especially for somebody like myself. I am awkward and have plenty of trouble talking to new people. Most of us are told not to talk to strangers when we are younger because there are all sorts of crazy people out there. There could not be a better way to break out of my shell and violate a social norm than to sit down and talk to total strangers while they eat. Being told that talking to strangers is dangerous since we were four can alter how we think about all of the unknown people around us. Somewhere along the line, the fear of being kidnapped and murdered transitions into not wanting to talk to some weirdo or to be rude. There are situations where it is perfectly okay to talk to a person you don’t know, like at a party. However, there are times when you should not talk to strangers, such as when they are eating. When you are alone, eating is usually a private experience, or when you are with…show more content…
Jumbling up my words and needlessly long pauses are a common occurrence in my attempts to converse with people. With this in mind, I set out to communicate with the fine folks in the food court of Cordova Mall. Normally I would shy away from such a task, but for my own personal benefit this was the best option. The main goal of this experiment was to record how the subjects reacted to my presence while they dine. My expectations were for people to feel awkward about my being there and want me to leave, I was quickly proven otherwise. Two of the tests shattered my belief that I would be