BEING INCLUSIVE AND GETTING SUPPORT.
This discussion is based on your reading of Chapter 3 of the text book HUMAN EXCEPTIONALITY 12TH EDITION MICHAEL L HARDMAN M. WINSTON EGAN CLIFFORD J. DREW, Inclusion and Multidisciplinary Collaboration in Early Childhood and Elementary Years. In this chapter, you learned about evidence-based inclusive schools, and about the importance of diversity, acceptance and belonging. These are buzz words today.
In schools today, how would the discussion (and handling) of “diversity, acceptance and belonging” be different than in schools in the year 1970?
If you were a parent in 1970, what challenges might you face addressing an issue of “diversity, acceptance and belonging” with the school administrators that impacted your child’s schooling?
Please post a response, and remember to respond to two other people’s postings. Please support your answers with appropriate citations and references of external sources.
Please note:
Your main post should be substantive – at least 200 words, not including the Discussion questions or references. Each discussion response/reply to me or others must have a minimum of 125 words, spell checked, well written and citing references in support of arguments. Active participation is required. Please see “How You Will Be Evaluated” info located under Course Information.
In your reply to others: You could include additional research info (don’t just share a website link, explain what you found, summarize the info, and then share the website link), or, provide a few suggestions based on the class reading/additional reading, or explain why you agree or disagree with your classmate. Always provide at least ONE citation from the reading to ‘support’ your discussion.
FIRST DISCUSSION POST:
In schools today, the discussion and handling of diversity, acceptance and belongings be different than schools in the year 1970 by how society’s perception has change over years. Board of education, and society has develop major changing that which compensate various opportunities, and aids. Like different school curriculum for children with disabilities. Base on the reading of chapter 3 “Changing Era in the lives of Students with Disabilities”, Hardman et (2017), suggested the many differences instructional programs, special services are making in the lives of early childhood and elementary schools years children (Hardman et al., 2017, p. 49). Hardman et al (2017) explain ‘partial, inclusive mainstreaming and full inclusive education’ for kids with disabilities. And they are consisted of a child getting specialize education in a general setting rather than being a full special Ed class. These kids can get to experience and be a part of and have a sense of belonging with other peers who are not disable (Hardman et al., 2017, p. 50). If i were a parent in 1970, challenges might i face addressing an issue of “diversity’, acceptance and belongings” with the school administrator that impacted my child’s schooling would have been, denial of opportunities for my child to participate in various program in school due to my child disability. It would of been hard to address these issues, since the law back than did not applied much to school age students with disabilities. My child would not have access to speech therapy, occupational therapy and a para, and my child would of been lack of his and her education (Hardman et al., 2017, p. 51).
Hardman, M. L., Drew, C. J.,
9 Name Institution Instructor Date EXTENSION OF WOMEN RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH ABORTION
9
Name
Institution
Instructor
Date
EXTENSION OF WOMEN RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH ABORTION IN THE UNITED STATES ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY AND OUTLINE
Annotated bibliography
Hoffmann, J. P., & Johnson, S. M. (2005). Attitudes toward abortion among religious traditions in the United States: Change or continuity? Sociology of Religion, 66(2), 161-182.
The purpose of this research was to demonstrate how diverse religious beliefs about abortion have resulted in differing shifts in the attitudes of their adherents over the course of history. The guiding hypotheses stated that, based on cultural events, position papers, and other religious media, Evangelicals have been against abortion due to their religious reasons, and their attitudes toward abortion for its psychological torture on the victims.
The tests were conducted using data from the General Social Survey collected between 1972 and 2002.The first hypothesis was true: Evangelicals’ opposition to abortions that aren’t for medical reasons has grown more than that of other religious groups. However, the second hypothesis was wrong. They had also become more against abortion because they had been traumatized by it. Evangelicals who were born in the last 40 years or so are the most likely to be against this. People think about abortion in different ways, and this article gives abortion a place in the world based on how people think about that. If you write an essay, you should not only write about religion, but also about the whole world because not everyone in the world believes in that religion. This would help make the findings more important. This research article correlates with the research by Beckman (2017) since they both address the attitude of different people on abortion as a women’s right. However, this research majors on the religious group.
Fried, M. G. (2008). Thirty five Years of Legal Abortion: The US Experience. Available at: Thirty-five Years of Legal Abortion: The US Experience (ids.ac.uk)
Abortion is legal, but it is restricted, according to this research study; the women who are most vulnerable – impoverished women, women of color, and young women – are branded and continuously under attack as a result of this stigma and restriction. An examination of the decline of abortion rights following legalization is undertaken by the author of this article, as well as the political methodologies used by opponents and advocates and the divisions within abortion rights supporters, in order to emphasize the need for a grand approach, strategy, and guidance. His study design has a long history of being used in social movements. According to the author, the 2008 presidential election offered a tremendous opportunity for positive change in national leadership. While at the same time, abortion concerns transcend political boundaries. Abortion rights, much alone a full reproductive justice agenda, would not be secured solely by electing Democratic candidates. It is the writer’s familiarity with the transfer of government regimes in conjunction with the change in women’s abortion rights that distinguishes this study from others. It does not, however, provide a long-term solution to the instabilities or the primary research problem at hand.
Beckman, L. J. (2017). Abortion in the United States: The continuing controversy. Feminism & Psychology, 27(1), 101-113.
The purpose of this study is to look into some of the motivations and interests of people who are interested in the abortion discussion. It will examine a variety of facets of the social background of abortion in the United States, beginning with the pro-life agenda that is intended to restrict access to reproductive health care. A closer look at how anti-abortion activists have been successful in restricting abortion access through legislation in recent years may aid us in better protecting and enhancing women’s rights. While conducting the study of the data, the researcher employed a quantitative approach. Abortion rates have been declining over the years, according to the findings of the study, which can be attributed to both restrictions on women’s right to abortion and the introduction of contraceptives. The author is mostly interested in researchers who are more interested in women’s reproductive rights in relation to abortion in the United States. The quantitative strategy used in our research study, which has proven to be critical in obtaining the results of our subject research, is a significant strength. Furthermore, the research study is similar to the study of Fried (2008) in that they both provide information about government regimes and the impact they have on the constraints on women’s rights to abortion rights. However, in contrast to the research conducted by Fried (2008), this study focuses specifically on President Trump’s rule in the United States of America.
Outline
2.1 Introduction
Abortion is legal in the United States, albeit it is strictly regulated. According to the amount of the increase in abortion as a medical service and the attitude toward it in society, the United States government has continued to impose limitations and rules on abortion as a medical service in the country. Through the use of many research and analyses by other writers, the paper will evaluate and discuss the expansion of women’s rights in the area of abortion. This research study is critical in assisting medical professionals in recognizing the importance of the safety of women’s lives and health when administering abortions in the context of medical services. The outcomes of this study are intended to help solve a social dilemma in which younger generations are believed to be losing their lives and developing health problems as a result of earlier abortions. The research focuses on women in the United States.
Review of the literature
The focus of this article will be on reviewing the literature on legislation that restricts access to abortion. The researcher will also look into the controversies surrounding abortion in the United States, as well as changes in abortion policies and limits (Guttmacher Institute, 2015b; Boonstra & Nash, 2014; Guttmacher Institute, 2016b; Beckman, 2017). Historical research on women’s rights in relation to legal abortion in the United States, as well as the attitude of the general public regarding abortion, will be conducted (Beckman, 2017; Hoffmann & Johnson, 2005).
Methodology
In order to come to a conclusion on the findings, this work will heavily rely on other studies. The articles include journal and book articles to determine the attitude of society toward abortion and policies, magazines evaluated in the United States on the extent of women’s right to abortion and legal abortion, and periodicals analyzed in the United Kingdom on the subject of abortion. The majority of the data for the analysis will come from secondary sources.
Findings/Arguments
After that, the writer will examine the findings in relation to the current state of women’s reproductive rights in the United States. Dome of the findings expected are as follows. As compared to the year 2000, there are a significantly greater number of state laws restricting abortion in a broader variety of ways, and the trend toward more restrictive legislation looks to be accelerating. Three hundred and thirty-two provisions were introduced into law during the first quarter of 2015. (Guttmacher Institute, 2015b). The new law doesn’t only apply to a few types of businesses, as it used to be the case. Use of government money for abortion, counselling services before an abortion, waiting periods, parental participation for minors, and limits on abortion coverage by private insurers are all examples of restrictive laws that is in place now. Gestational limits and “targeted regulation of abortion providers” (TRAP) laws that make unnecessary rules for abortion locations and practitioners, like having to live up to the standards of an outpatient surgery center, are examples of restrictive laws that is in place .
People who are against abortion in most, if not all, of the circumstances in which it happens have been elected to legislative bodies. A lot of anti-abortion politicians were elected governors in 2010 and 2014. Some anti-abortion legislators also took control of a number of state legislatures. By 2015, pro-lifers had control of 31 of the 50 legislative seats and two-thirds of the legislative branch, which was a big change from the year before. In the wake of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010, which was a federal health-care program that was meant to make it easier for people to get health insurance, it’s probable that there will be more legislative efforts to limit how abortion services can be provided. A public fallout to the Affordable Care Act has led to a national debate about whether public money should be used to pay for abortions. This has led to more constraints on healthcare insurance for abortion in some jurisdictions (Boonstra & Nash, 2014). Because the Affordable Care Act (ACA) doesn’t consider abortion the same as other health care, women have better direct exposure to other women’s healthcare, like breast cancer and STI screening. Some 25 (50%) of the states that have insurance exchanges don’t cover abortions. That’s according to the Congressional Research Service, which looked into this in September 2016. (Guttmacher Institute, 2016b).
According to Guttmacher Institute, (2016c) Medication abortion’s potential benefits are currently curtailed in various jurisdictions by regulations that only certified doctors can perform medication abortions (thirty-seven jurisdictions) and that the physician be present physically during the administering of the oral drugs. Contrary to protocol restrictions, the usage of pharmaceutical abortion has increased dramatically at the same time that the overall abortion rate has been on the decline. By 2011, fifty nine percent of abortion practitioners in the United States were providing women with medication abortion.
The United States Supreme Court has not ruled on abortion rights in well over four decades, but the recently approved Alabama law has been labeled as the country’s known draconian anti-abortion legislation. Because of the sensitivity of the subject matter, it has become a central point of contention that demands sensitive and subtle management. According to a 2019 survey, approximately sixty one percent of adults in the United States have a belief that abortion should legalized in almost every situations, compared to 38 percent who believe abortion should be banned in all or most cases. America’s voters are more inclined than not to allow for exceptions on both sides of the abortion debate, with more people stating that abortion should be allowed or prohibited in most cases rather than always. Polls show that the social perception on legalizing abortion has remained to be high for the last two decades, with little variation between male and female’s attitudes (Lipka and Gramlich, 2019). The discussion has traditionally been framed as a contest between liberals, Democrats, and conservatives. Population changes show that Democrats as well as those who bend towards to the Democratic Party are more likely than Republican voters to promote legal abortion in all or the vast bulk of situations (eighty two percent vs. thirty six percent). There are also significant disparities in terms of religious allegiance. Among white evangelical Protestants, for example, three-quarters (77 percent) believe abortion should be prohibited in all or most situations, whereas constant bigger proportions of religiously unaffiliated Americans (eighty three percent) believe abortion should be lawful in most of the cases.
Discussions
A small decrease in the number of abortion providers has already occurred as a result of restrictive legislation, which has further exacerbated the uneven geographic distribution of services. Both the increased strain in getting abortion services and the increased availability and usage of reliable long-term contraception are anticipated to have an impact on the future decrease in abortion percentage rate in the United States. Feminists in the United States and other areas of the world must be aware of the history, important concerns, and present elements of the “abortion debate” in the United States in order to effectively advocate for their causes. Consideration of differences in abortion access can aid in the development of political and policy initiatives to expand access for those who are disproportionately disadvantaged.
According to logic, increasing the cost on ladies looking abortion services will lead to at least some of them foregoing the surgery entirely and instead having to carry unwanted pregnancies that will be unwanted by their partners or family. Furthermore, whereas a single state law may not have a significant impact on medical experts’ ability to perform abortion services or patients’ aaccessibility to them, the proliferation of new laws passed by the state legislative bodies, unless overturned by the courts, is likely to be relevant to further decrease in abortion rates.
REFERENCES
Beckman, L. J. (2017). Abortion in the United States: The continuing controversy. Feminism & Psychology, 27(1), 101-113.
Boonstra, H. D., Nash, E. (2014) A surge of state abortion restrictions put providers – and the women they serve – in the crosshairs. Guttmacher Policy Review 17(1): 9–14. 28. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/17/1/gpr170109.html.
Hoffmann, J. P., & Johnson, S. M. (2005). Attitudes toward abortion among religious traditions in the United States: Change or continuity?. Sociology of Religion, 66(2), 161-182.
Guttmacher Institute. (2015b, April 2). Trends in the states: First quarter 2015. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/media/inthenews/2015/04/02/.
Guttmacher Institute. (2016b). Restricting insurance coverage of abortion. State laws and policies as of September 1, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_RICA.pdf.
Guttmacher Institute. (2016c). Medication abortion: State laws and policies as of September 1, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/medication-abortion.
Lipka, M., & Gramlich, J. (2019, August 30). 5 facts about the abortion debate in America. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/08/30/facts-about-abortion-debat e-in-america/
3 Name Institution Instructor Date EXTENSION OF WOMEN RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH ABORTION
2 discussion Posts of a Discussion: BEING INCLUSIVE AND GETTING THE SUPPORT. Management Assignment Help 3
Name
Institution
Instructor
Date
EXTENSION OF WOMEN RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH ABORTION IN THE UNITED STATES ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY AND OUTLINE
Annotated bibliography
Hoffmann, J. P., & Johnson, S. M. (2005). Attitudes toward abortion among religious traditions in the United States: Change or continuity? Sociology of Religion, 66(2), 161-182.
The purpose of this research was to demonstrate how diverse religious beliefs about abortion have resulted in differing shifts in the attitudes of their adherents over the course of history. The guiding hypotheses stated that, based on cultural events, position papers, and other religious media, Evangelicals have been against abortion due to their religious reasons, and their attitudes toward abortion for its psychological torture on the victims.
The tests were conducted using data from the General Social Survey collected between 1972 and 2002.The first hypothesis was true: Evangelicals’ opposition to abortions that aren’t for medical reasons has grown more than that of other religious groups. However, the second hypothesis was wrong. They had also become more against abortion because they had been traumatized by it. Evangelicals who were born in the last 40 years or so are the most likely to be against this. People think about abortion in different ways, and this article gives abortion a place in the world based on how people think about that. If you write an essay, you should not only write about religion, but also about the whole world because not everyone in the world believes in that religion. This would help make the findings more important.
Fried, M. G. (2008). Thirty five Years of Legal Abortion: The US Experience. Available at: Thirty-five Years of Legal Abortion: The US Experience (ids.ac.uk)
Abortion is legal, but it is restricted, according to this research study; the women who are the most susceptible — impoverished women, women of color, and young women – are stigmatized and constantly under attack. The author of this article examines the decline of abortion rights after legalization, as well as opponents’ and advocates’ political techniques and divides within abortion rights proponents, to highlight the need for new vision, plan, and direction. His research methodology has a long history of activism. The author finds that the 2008 presidential election provided a tremendous potential for good change in national leadership. At the same time, abortion concerns cut across political lines. Electing Democrats alone would not secure abortion rights, much less a comprehensive reproductive justice program. The strength of this study is that the writer is well equipped with the transition of government regimes with change of women’s right on abortion. It however does not give a strategic solution to the instability or the main issue of research.
Beckman, L. J. (2017). Abortion in the United States: The continuing controversy. Feminism & Psychology, 27(1), 101-113.
This paper shall examine some of the motives and interests of those involved in the abortion debate. It shall explore various aspects of the sociopolitical context of abortion in the US, beginning with the pro-life agenda that is designed to impede access to abortion. Examination of how in recent years anti-abortion advocates have been successful in restricting abortion access through legislation may help us to better protect and enhance women’s rights. The researcher has used quantitative approach in the analysis of the data. The conclusion of the test is that there has been a decline of abortions over the years resulting from not only the restrictions in the women’s right on abortion but also the emergence of contraceptives. The writer targets researchers who are more interested on women rights pertaining abortion in the United States. The strength of this research study is its quantitative approach that has been of essence to the findings of our subject research
Outline
2.1 Introduction
In the US, abortion is legal though it is restricted. The US government has continued to establish restrictions and policies on abortion as a medical service based on the extent of its increase and the attitude towards it in the society. The paper will thus analyze and discuss the extension of women’s rights in Abortion through the use of various studies and analysis by other writers. This research study is important for the medical practitioners to recognize the safety of women’s lives and health safety in the administration of abortion in medical services. The findings of this research aims to solve the social problem where the younger generations are said to lose lives and have health issues due to earlier abortions. The study focuses on the women aging from 20-30 years in the United States.
Review of the literature
This paper will mainly review literature on the Legislation that restricts abortion access. The researcher will also review controversies and changes in policies and restrictions on abortion in the US (Guttmacher Institute, 2015b; Boonstra & Nash, 2014; Guttmacher Institute, 2016b; Beckman, 2017). Historical research on women rights pertaining legal abortion in the US and also the attitude of the society towards abortion will also be analyzed (Beckman, 2017; Hoffmann & Johnson, 2005).
Methodology
This paper will majorly rely on other researches to conclude on the findings. The articles include journal and books to find the attitude of the society towards abortion and policies, periodicals analyzed in the United States on the extent of women’s right on abortion and legal abortion. Secondary data will be the major source of the analysis.
Findings/Arguments
The writer will then analyze the findings on the existing women’s rights abortion in the United States. The statistical data findings on the 20-30 years women age- group will also be presented. They will be presented in graph and table analysis for better clarity for the readers. The percentage trends will also be presented based on the researchers.
Today there are a much greater number of state laws limiting abortion in a wider variety of ways than was the case in the year 2000, and the trend towards restrictive legislation appears to be accelerating. During the first quarter of 2015 alone, 332 provisions were introduced in legislation (Guttmacher Institute, 2015b). The new legislation is not limited to a few specific types. Existing restrictive laws include: gestational limits; targeted regulation of abortion provider [TRAP] laws that impose unnecessary requirements on abortion sites and providers, such as meeting the standards of an ambulatory surgical center; prohibition of use of state funds for abortion; mandated counseling before abortion; required waiting periods; parental involvement for minors; and restriction of coverage of abortion in private insurance plans
The surge in anti-abortion legislation is the direct result of the election of politicians to state governments who oppose abortion under most or all circumstances. Several anti-abortion legislators were elected as governors and politicians opposed to abortion took control of several state legislatures as a consequence of the 2010 and 2014 elections. By 2015, individuals opposed to abortion held 31 of 50 governorships and controlled two-thirds of state legislatures.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010, a federal health care program intended to provide broad access to health insurance, may have intensified introduction of laws that limit various aspects of provision of abortion services. Politics associated with the ACA have fueled national debate about use of government funds to pay for abortion and led to additional limitations on insurance coverage for abortion in several states (Boonstra & Nash, 2014). The ACA, which has resulted in significant advances in women’s access to other reproductive health services such as breast cancer and STI screening, treats abortion differently from all other health services. It allows states to restrict coverage for abortion in insurance plans that are part of their exchange marketplaces; as of 1 September 2016, 25 (50 percent) of the states have done so (Guttmacher Institute, 2016b).
The potential advantages of medication abortion currently are limited in many states by requirements that only licensed physicians can provide medication abortions (37 states) and that the provider physically be present during administration of the oral medications (19 states) (Guttmacher Institute, 2016c). Despite protocol limitations, the use of medication abortion has grown rapidly at the same time that the total abortion rate has continued its decline. By 2011, 59 percent of abortion providers in the US had offered medication abortion to women.
Discussions
Restrictive laws already have contributed to a somewhat reduced number of abortion providers and have intensified the unequal geographic distribution of services. In the future, both the difficulty of obtaining abortions and the greater access to and use of effective long-lasting contraceptives are likely to influence falling abortion rates.
Feminists both in the United States and in other parts of the world need to understand the background, key issues and current components of the “abortion debate” in the United States. Consideration of disparities in abortion access can facilitate political and policy efforts to increase access for the groups most underserved.
It logically follows that an increased burden on women seeking abortion will result in at least some forgoing the procedure entirely, instead having children, some of whom are unwanted. Furthermore, while a single statute may not critically restrict medical professionals’ ability to conduct abortions or patients’ access to them, unless reversed by the courts, the multitude of new laws passed by state legislatures is likely to contribute to further declines in abortion rates
REFERENCES
Beckman, L. J. (2017). Abortion in the United States: The continuing controversy. Feminism & Psychology, 27(1), 101-113.
Boonstra, H. D., Nash, E. (2014) A surge of state abortion restrictions put providers – and the women they serve – in the crosshairs. Guttmacher Policy Review 17(1): 9–14. 28. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/17/1/gpr170109.html.
Hoffmann, J. P., & Johnson, S. M. (2005). Attitudes toward abortion among religious traditions in the United States: Change or continuity?. Sociology of Religion, 66(2), 161-182.
Guttmacher Institute. (2015b, April 2). Trends in the states: First quarter 2015. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/media/inthenews/2015/04/02/.
Guttmacher Institute. (2016b). Restricting insurance coverage of abortion. State laws and policies as of September 1, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_RICA.pdf.
Guttmacher Institute. (2016c). Medication abortion: State laws and policies as of September 1, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/medication-abortion.
5 Interactive Nature of Art Student’s Name Professor’s Name Course Date The
5
Interactive Nature of Art
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course
Date
The Art of Painting
Art is one of the main activities in the lifestyle of humankind. In contemporary philosophy, art is defined as expressing humanity’s intuitions, desires, thoughts, and emotions. Further, imagination and creativity produce a physical object; thus, the entire process is art. There are three types of art; fine art, commercial and decorative forms. Consequently, this article presents painting as one of the examples of visual arts, a form of expressing oneself by carrying out various creative works. Artistic mediums refer to diverse materials used in making the works of art.
Notably, interactive art applies technological methods in communicating directly to the audience to enhance participation. Interactive art is achieved through interaction with a digital system, such as a three-dimensional unit for sound production or movement within a web-based community (Jeon et al., 2019). Supposing a work of art responds to a viewer, it is created and allocated a meaning only after observation. Significantly, the creative manner of stimulating a physical environment by using light, technology, and sound turns passive onlookers into active participants. Due to possession of an inviting nature, interactive art installations have been extremely prominent in the world of art in the present society. Although painting is one of the conventional mediums that largely accounts for artwork, the genre of interactive art is widespread in contemporary conceptions. Advancement in technology has steered works of art springing up diverse transformations in culture and the internet (Guo & Zhang, 2022). The existence of inclusivity and increased participation from viewers is quite beneficiary both to the clients and customers.
Art history began when human beings designed several materials to express their feelings, perspectives, and personal issues relating to life events. Artists have chosen appropriate techniques and concepts relevant to their artistic expression and skills.
Art history started with pigments of powder used in creating pictures in Altamira caves. Presently, the advancement of technological know-how has resulted in high levels of creativity in art. Over the past years, people have been using various materials. To develop the best form of fine art, a few factors should be considered to select the perfect medium. People in the ancient era utilized various drawing and painting tools, mediums, and styles. Karen points out that widespread mediums for painting include tempera, oil painting, watercolors, charcoal, pastels, chalk, graphite pencils, pen and ink, and acrylic form of painting (Argus, 2020). Recently, artists have come up with the three-dimensional system in which a given piece of art contains width, height, and depth. The availability of diverse art materials, techniques, and a wide range of concepts have enabled humans to create most sculptures globally. Painting refers to an act of expressing emotions and ideas with the formulation of definite qualities of beauty in two-dimensional graphical linguistics.
Certainly, diverse elements corresponding to visual language are used to produce sensations of space, motion, volume, and light on a plane. Such elements include texture, shapes, tones, and corresponding colors (Kuwat & Astuti, 2022). The elements are further combined to form communicative designs that create wholly visual relationships from the abstract, represent supernatural or actual phenomena, and interpret a narrative’s theme. A decision by an expert to utilize a certain medium or any variety of modernized forms is determined by communicative precincts and potentials besides the one-to-one sumptuous qualities of those choices. Subsequently, the form and choice of medium to be used and the skills altogether result in an exceptional pictorial image.
Traditionally, cultures belonging to certain ethnic groups, federations, societies, and royal courts significantly determined the imagery, expertise, and subject matter. Also, the cultural traditions controlled functions of art as instructive, ceremonial, enjoyable, religious, and ornamental. Religious leaders employed painters as technical artisans instead of creative entertainers. In the 19th century, most of the painters in the Western culture substituted social positions with patronage posts. The art of painting resulted in income-making projects such as exhibitions and fees from the entrance. Other artists combined paintings with sculptures to create three-dimensional non-concrete designs. The diverse history of painting can be envisioned in Egyptian art and architecture, depicting how symbolism, imagery, utilization of distinct forms of mediums, and subject matter. Developments in the art of painting have been treated differently across the universe in articles such as art conservation and restoration. For instance, Chinese painting, African art, Islamic arts, Native American art, Oceanic art and architecture, Japanese art, Korean art, and Western painting are some of the articles that contain aspects of this artistic branch. According to authors of religious symbolism and iconography, painting plays several roles in the socio-cultural sector of society.
Noteworthy, Aesthetics is the philosophical study of taste and beauty. It implies a positive, pleasant, impressive, and artful appearance. According to Stefan and Christian, aesthetics in art is a discipline that deals with appreciation, perception, and production of art (Ortileb & Carbon, 2019). An aesthetic experience such as looking at paintings relates to the discernment of a certain external object without considering its usefulness. Generally, aesthetic experience entails more issues than preference alone. The subject encompasses a lot of emotional responses ranging from awe to beauty, sublimity, and other emotions based on human knowledge.
In conclusion, the article above discusses the interactive nature of art and the lifestyles of the human population at large. The painting, one of the mediums of art, requires an audience for interactive links. The paper has formulated a claim concerning painting and eventually illustrated an aesthetic theory about the art. Aesthetic value in art is quite a fundamental aspect.
References
Argus, K. (2020). Arts practice and process: a basis for a pedagogical approach to art education focused on issues of social relevance (Doctoral dissertation, James Cook University). https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/68494/
Guo, L., & Zhang, L. (2022). Exploration on the Application of New Media Interactive Art to the Protection of Traditional Culture. Scientific Programming, 2022. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/sp/2022/5418622/
Jeon, M., Fiebrink, R., Edmonds, E. A., & Herath, D. (2019). From rituals to magic: Interactive art and HCI of the past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 131, 108-119. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1071581919300758
Kuwat, K., & Astuti, K. S. (2022). Semiotic Analysis of the Elements of Fine Art in Muslim Households. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9(3), 58-63. https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/3429
Ortlieb, S. A., & Carbon, C. C. (2019). A functional model of kitsch and art: linking aesthetic appreciation to the dynamics of social motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2437. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02437/full